Korean Circ J.  2013 Jul;43(7):468-473. 10.4070/kcj.2013.43.7.468.

Significant Response to Lower Acetylcholine Dose Is Associated with Worse Clinical and Angiographic Characteristics in Patients with Vasospastic Angina

Affiliations
  • 1Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea. swrha617@yahoo.co.kr
  • 2Cardiology Department, Konkuk University Chungju Hospital, Chungju, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The intracoronary injection of acetylcholine (Ach) has been shown to induce coronary spasms in patients with variant angina. Clinical significance and angiographic characteristics of patients with a significant response to lower Ach dosages are as-yet non-clarified compared with patients responding to higher Ach doses.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
A total of 3034 consecutive patients underwent coronary angiography with Ach provocation tests from January 2004 to August 2010. Ach was injected in incremental doses of 20, 50, 100 microg into the left coronary artery. Significant coronary artery spasm was defined as focal or diffuse severe transient luminal narrowing (>70%) with/without chest pain or ST-T change on the electrocardiogram (ECG). We compared the clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients who responded to a lower Ach dose (20 or 50 microg, n=556) to those that responded to a higher Ach dose (100 microg, n=860).
RESULTS
The baseline clinical and procedural characteristics are well balanced between the two groups, except diabetes was higher in the lower Ach dose group and there were differences in medication history. After adjusting for confounding factors, the lower Ach dose group showed more frequent temporary ST elevation and atrioventricular block on the ECG. Furthermore, the group of patients who responded to the lower Ach dose was associated with a higher incidence of baseline and severe spasm than those who responded to a higher Ach dose.
CONCLUSION
Patients with a significant response to a lower Ach dose were associated with more frequent ST elevation, baseline spasm, and more severe spasm compared with those who responded to a higher Ach dose, suggesting more intensive medical therapy with close clinical follow-up is required for those patients.

Keyword

Angina pectoris, variant; Acetylcholine

MeSH Terms

Acetylcholine
Angina Pectoris, Variant
Atrioventricular Block
Chest Pain
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Vessels
Electrocardiography
Humans
Incidence
Phenobarbital
Spasm
Acetylcholine
Phenobarbital

Cited by  1 articles

Association between Ischemic Electrocardiographic Changes during Acetylcholine Provocation Test and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Vasospastic Angina
Sung Il Im, Seung-Woon Rha, Byoung Geol Choi, Jin Oh Na, Cheol Ung Choi, Hong Euy Lim, Jin Won Kim, Eung Ju Kim, Chang Gyu Park, Hong Seog Seo
Kosin Med J. 2019;34(1):1-14.    doi: 10.7180/kmj.2019.34.1.1.


Reference

1. Nardi F, Verna E, Secco GG, et al. Variant angina associated with coronary artery endothelial dysfunction and myocardial bridge: a case report and review of the literature. Intern Med. 2011; 50:2601–2606.
2. Kawano H, Ogawa H. Endothelial function and coronary spastic angina. Intern Med. 2005; 44:91–99.
3. el-Tamimi H, Davies GJ, Crea F, Maseri A. Response of human coronary arteries to acetylcholine after injury by coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21:1152–1157.
4. Ludmer PL, Selwyn AP, Shook TL, et al. Paradoxical vasoconstriction induced by acetylcholine in atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1986; 315:1046–1051.
5. Horio Y, Yasue H, Rokutanda M, et al. Effects of intracoronary injection of acetylcholine on coronary arterial diameter. Am J Cardiol. 1986; 57:984–989.
6. Sueda S, Kohno H, Fukuda H, et al. Clinical and angiographical characteristics of acetylcholine- induced spasm: relationship to dose of intracoronary injection of acetylcholine. Coron Artery Dis. 2002; 13:231–236.
7. Chen KY, Rha SW, Li YJ, et al. Impact of hypertension on coronary artery spasm as assessed with intracoronary acetylcholine provocation test. J Hum Hypertens. 2010; 24:77–85.
8. Im SI, Rha SW, Choi BG, et al. Angiographic and Clinical Characteristics according to Intracoronary Acetylcholine Dose in Patients with Myocardial Bridge. Cardiology. 2013; 125:250–257.
9. Lanza GA, Careri G, Crea F. Mechanisms of coronary artery spasm. Circulation. 2011; 124:1774–1782.
10. Kaski JC, Crea F, Meran D, et al. Local coronary supersensitivity to diverse vasoconstrictive stimuli in patients with variant angina. Circulation. 1986; 74:1255–1265.
11. Newman CM, Maseri A, Hackett DR, el-Tamimi HM, Davies GJ. Response of angiographically normal and atherosclerotic left anterior descending coronary arteries to acetylcholine. Am J Cardiol. 1990; 66:1070–1076.
12. Yasue H, Horio Y, Nakamura N, et al. Induction of coronary artery spasm by acetylcholine in patients with variant angina: possible role of the parasympathetic nervous system in the pathogenesis of coronary artery spasm. Circulation. 1986; 74:955–963.
13. Okumura K, Yasue H, Horio Y, et al. Multivessel coronary spasm in patients with variant angina: a study with intracoronary injection of acetylcholine. Circulation. 1988; 77:535–542.
14. Sakata K, Miura F, Sugino H, et al. Assessment of regional sympathetic nerve activity in vasospastic angina: analysis of iodine 123-labeled metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. Am Heart J. 1997; 133:484–489.
15. Lee SJ, Park SJ, Park SW, et al. Increased basal tone and hyperresponsiveness to acetylcholine and ergonovine in spasm-related coronary arteries in patients with variant angina. Int J Cardiol. 1996; 55:117–126.
16. Kaski JC, Maseri A, Vejar M, Crea F, Hackett D. Spontaneous coronary artery spasm in variant angina is caused by a local hyperreactivity to a generalized constrictor stimulus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 14:1456–1463.
17. Kuga T, Egashira K, Inou T, Takeshita A. Correlation of basal coronary artery tone with constrictive response to ergonovine in patients with variant angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22:144–150.
18. Okumura K, Yasue H, Matsuyama K, et al. Diffuse disorder of coronary artery vasomotility in patients with coronary spastic angina. Hyperreactivity to the constrictor effects of acetylcholine and the dilator effects of nitroglycerin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27:45–52.
19. Ong P, Athanasiadis A, Hill S, Vogelsberg H, Voehringer M, Sechtem U. Coronary artery spasm as a frequent cause of acute coronary syndrome: The CASPAR (Coronary Artery Spasm in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52:523–527.
20. JCS Joint Working Group. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of patients with vasospastic angina (coronary spastic angina) (JCS 2008): digest version. Circ J. 2010; 74:1745–1762.
21. Yasue H, Omote S, Takizawa A, Nagao M, Miwa K, Tanaka S. Circadian variation of exercise capacity in patients with Prinzmetal's variant angina: role of exercise-induced coronary arterial spasm. Circulation. 1979; 59:938–948.
22. Okumura K, Yasue H, Matsuyama K, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of intracoronary injection of acetylcholine for the induction of coronary artery spasm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988; 12:883–888.
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr