Korean J Pediatr Hematol Oncol.
2001 Oct;8(2):238-249.
Risk-based Grouping of Patients and Risk-directed Treatment in Neuroblastoma
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kwsped@samsung.co.kr
- 2Department of Pediatric Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- 4Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- 5Department of Clinical Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- 6Department of Cancer Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- 7Department of Biostatistics Unit, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
- PURPOSE: This study was done to evaluate whether risk-directed treatment can improve survival of patients with high risk neuroblastoma (NBL).
METHODS
Forty two patients with NBL were newly diagnosed and treated at Samsung Seoul Hospital from June 1997 to December 2000. Patients were divided into high risk or low risk group according to 3 important prognostic factors. Poor prognostic factors were defined as follows; amplification of N-myc oncogene, age at diagnosis higher than 1 years, and INSS stage 4. Patients with 2 or more poor prognostic factors were defined as high risk patients. While conventional treatment including surgery, radiotherapy, and pre and post-operative chemotherapy was applied to low risk patients, intensive multimodality treatment including single or double high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) followed by immunotherapy using interleukin-2 (IL-2) and differentiating therapy using 13-cis-retinoic acid (CRA) was applied to high risk patients.
RESULTS
Among 42 patients, 30 patients were high risk, 10 patients were low risk, and 2 patients were impossible to classify. Forty five HDCTs and PBSCTs were applied to 28 high risk patients and 2 low risk patients. All of the low risk patients are alive without relapse. Three year event free survival (EFS) after diagnosis in high risk patients was 54.8%. EFS after diagnosis in patients with 2 or 3 risk factors were 81.3%, 39.3% (P=0.0292) respectively. EFS after HDCT was 65.1%. EFS after HDCT in patients with 2 or 3 risk factors were 85.7%, 47.1% (P=0.0527) respectively.
CONCLUSION
Risk-based grouping of patients and risk-directed treatment are necessary for better outcome. Multimodality treatment including HDCT and autologous PBSCT followed by immunotherapy using IL-2 and differentiatin therapy using CRA can improve survival in high risk patients.