Korean J Urol.  2007 May;48(5):512-516. 10.4111/kju.2007.48.5.512.

Association between Nanobacteria and Urinary Calcium Stone Disease

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Seoul, Korea. hhkim@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Clinical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Nanobacteria have been reported to induce various pathologic calcifications like atherosclerosis and nephrolithiasis, and they do so by forming an apatite envelope, however, this concept is still controversial. We tried to elucidate whether nanobacteria might be related with urinary calcium stone by performing comparative study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study included 38 urinary stone patients who were proved to have calcium-containing stones and 37 healthy adults without urinary stone disease as controls. The subjects' age and gender were well matched between both groups. For the detection of nanobacteria, the serum and urine of all subjects were collected and western blotting for the samples was performed.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in the positive rate of nanobacteria from the serum samples between stone and control groups (52.6% vs 48.6%, respectively, p=0.465). But on the urine samples, the stone group showed a significantly higher positive rate than the control group (71.1% vs 21.6%, respectively, p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Nanobacteria might have a relation with urinary calcium stone disease.

Keyword

Bacteria; Urolithiasis; Calcium

MeSH Terms

Adult
Atherosclerosis
Bacteria
Blotting, Western
Calcifying Nanoparticles*
Calcium*
Humans
Nephrolithiasis
Urinary Calculi
Urolithiasis
Calcifying Nanoparticles
Calcium

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Western blot analysis of urine protein. Nanobacteria Western blot of urinary protein from stone patients and normal control showed a single band at 39kDa. The detection rate of nanobacteria in urine from stone group is higher than normal control. C1-3: control group, S1-4: stone group, L: ladder.


Reference

1. Carson DA. An infectious origin of extraskeletal calcification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998. 95:7846–7847.
2. Resick MI, Boyce WH. Wickham JE, editor. Aetiological theories of renal lithiasis: a historical review. Urinary calculous disease. 1979. 1st ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone;1–20.
3. Khullar M, Sharma SK, Singh SK, Bajwa P, Sheikh FA, Relan V, et al. Morphological and immunological characteristics of nanobacteria from human renal stones of north Indian population. Urol Res. 2004. 32:190–195.
4. Ciftcioglu N, Bjorklund M, Kuorikoski K, Bergstrom K, Kajander EO. Nanobacteria: an infectious cause of kidney stone formation. Kidney Int. 1999. 56:1893–1898.
5. Drancourt M, Jacomo V, Lepidi H, Lechevallier E, Grisoni V, Coulange C, et al. Attempted isolation of Nanobacterium Sp microorganisms from upper urinary tract stones. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. 41:368–372.
6. Sommer AP, Oron U, Pretorius AM, McKay DS, Ciftcioglu N, Mester AR, et al. A preliminary investigation into light-modulated replication of nanobacteria and heart disease. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2003. 21:231–235.
7. Zeng JF, Zhang W, Jiang HW, Ling JQ. Isolation, cultivation and initial identification of Nanobacteria from dental pulp stone. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006. 41:498–501.
8. Hudelist G, Singer CF, Kubista E, Manavi M, Mueller R, Pischinger K, et al. Presence of nanobacteria in psammoma bodies of ovarian cancer: evidence for pathogenetic role in intratumoral biomineralization. Histopathology. 2004. 45:633–637.
9. Abbott A. Battle lines drawn between 'nanobacteria' researchers. Nature. 1999. 401:105.
10. Cisar JO, Xu DQ, Thompson J, Swaim W, Hu L, Kopecko DJ. An alternative interpretation of nanobacteria-induced biomineralization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000. 97:11511–11515.
11. Kajander EO, Ciftcioglu N, Aho K, Garcia-Cuerpo E. Characteristics of nanobacteria and their possible role in stone formation. Urol Res. 2003. 31:47–54.
12. Kajander EO, Kuronene I, Akerman K. Nanobacteria from blood, the smallest culturable autonomously replicating agent on Earth. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 1997. 3111:420–424.
13. Akerman KK, Kuikka JT, Ciftcioglu N. Radiolabeling and in vivo distribution of nanobacteria in the rabbit. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 1997. 3111:436–442.
14. Carr RJ. A new theory of the formation of renal calculi. Br J Urol. 1954. 26:105–117.
15. Randall A. The origin and growth of renal calculi. Ann Surg. 1937. 105:1009–1016.
16. Cuerpo EG, Kajander EO, Ciftcioglu N, Lovaco CF, Correa C, Escudero BA, et al. Nanobacteria. An experimental neolithogenesis model. Arch Esp Urol. 2000. 53:291–303.
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr