Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab.  2013 Jun;18(2):65-70. 10.6065/apem.2013.18.2.65.

Comparison of the prevalence of islet autoantibodies according to age and disease duration in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea. leedy@jbnu.ac.kr
  • 2Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study investigated the prevalence of islet autoantibodies in children and adults with T1DM according to their age and the duration of disease.
METHODS
We measured the levels of islet autoantibodies, including antiglutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (anti-GAD Ab), and combined these with anthropometric measurements and laboratory tests of 137 patients newly diagnosed with T1DM during the last 20 years. The subjects were subdivided into four groups according to their age at the onset of the disease. We then compared the prevalence of islet autoantibodies in the different age groups with the duration of disease.
RESULTS
Among the 137 patients, 68.9% tested positive for islet autoantibodies (71.4% within 1 year; 67.7% after 1 year of the disease onset). Within 1 year of the onset of the disease, 66.3% of the patients were positive for the anti-GAD Ab, and 35.6% were positive for IAAs. The prevalence of islet autoantibodies was significantly higher in the prepubertal groups than in the postpubertal groups (80.0% vs. 58.3%). The rate of positive islet autoantibodies changed with the duration of disease, and it differed according to the type of autoantibody and the age of the patient.
CONCLUSION
The rates of positive islet autoantibodies were significantly higher in younger than in older patients at the time of the diagnosis of the disease. The positive rates were significantly changed 1 year after the onset of the disease in the preschool and the children groups. So these findings suggest that we need to diagnose type 1B diabetes distinguished T2DM in aldolescent group, carefully.

Keyword

Islet autoantibody; Type 1 diabetes mellitus; Glutamic acid decarboxylase; Insulin autoantibody

MeSH Terms

Adult
Autoantibodies
Child
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Glutamate Decarboxylase
Humans
Prevalence
Autoantibodies
Glutamate Decarboxylase

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Comparison of mean insulin autoantibody (IAA) mean levels among the each age groups in patients with type 1 diabetes diagnosed within 1 year of onset. *,†Statistical significances were tested by one way analysis of variances among groups. The same markers indicate nonsignificant difference between groups based on Duncan multiple comparison test.

  • Fig. 2 Prevalence rate (%) of antiglutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody in patients with type 1 diabetes diagnosed within 1 year and after 1 year of onset. *The marker indicates statistical significant difference between groups diagnosed within 1 year and after 1 year of onset. Statistical significances were tested by independent two-sample t test between groups.

  • Fig. 3 Prevalence rate (%) of insulin autoantibody (IAA). The first group patients studied IAA within one year after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. And the second group patients studied after one year. *The marker indicates statistical significant difference between groups diagnosed within 1 year and after 1 year. Statistical significances were tested by independent two-sample t test between groups.


Cited by  2 articles

Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Childhood Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Study from 2000 to 2013
Tae Hyun Park, Min Sun Kim, Dae-Yeol Lee
Chonnam Med J. 2016;52(1):64-69.    doi: 10.4068/cmj.2016.52.1.64.

Sputum Autoantibodies Are More Relevant in Autoimmune Responses in Asthma than Are Serum Autoantibodies
Rundong Qin, Fei Long, Xiaojun Xiao, Jing Xiao, Zhengyu Zheng, Mulin Feng, Renbin Huang, Tao Peng, Jing Li
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2019;11(3):406-421.    doi: 10.4168/aair.2019.11.3.406.


Reference

1. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(Suppl 1):S5–S20. PMID: 12502614.
2. Yoo EG, Shin HJ, Kim DH. The clinical types and characteristics of diabetes mellitus in Korean children. J Korean Pediatr Soc. 2000; 43:1591–1598.
3. DIAMOND Project Group. Incidence and trends of childhood type 1 diabetes worldwide 1990-1999. Diabet Med. 2006; 23:857–866. PMID: 16911623.
4. Patterson CC, Dahlquist GG, Gyurus E, Green A, Soltesz G. EURODIAB Study Group. Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in Europe during 1989-2003 and predicted new cases 2005-20: a multicentre prospective registration study. Lancet. 2009; 373:2027–2033. PMID: 19481249.
Article
5. Shin CH. Epidemiologic characteristics of type 1 diabetes in children aged 14 years or under in Korea, 1985-2000. Korean J Pediatr. 2008; 51:569–575.
Article
6. Ko KW, Yang SW, Cho NH. The incidence of IDDM in Seoul from 1985 to 1988. Diabetes Care. 1994; 17:1473–1475. PMID: 7882820.
Article
7. Shin CH. Type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Korean Pediatr Soc. 2002; 45:1181–1191.
8. Kim MS, Yu KY, Na JI, Kim JD, Lee OK, Lee DY. The changes of incidence of childhood diabetes in Jeollabuk-do for 26 years. J Korean Soc Pediatr Endocrinol. 2008; 13:29–35.
9. Sella T, Shoshan A, Goren I, Shalev V, Blumenfeld O, Laron Z, et al. A retrospective study of the incidence of diagnosed Type 1 diabetes among children and adolescents in a large health organization in Israel, 2000-2008. Diabet Med. 2011; 28:48–53. PMID: 21166845.
10. Hur J, Lee HS, Hwang JS. Clinical characteristics of type 1 diabetes mellitus at initial diagnosis. J Korean Soc Pediatr Endocrinol. 2006; 11:177–184.
11. Choi JH, Kim MS, Kim CJ, Kim JD, Lee DY. Comparison of clinical and laboratory characteristics in children with type 1 diabetes according to pancreatic autoantibodies. Korean J Pediatr. 2010; 53:414–419.
12. Lee CW, Shin HJ, Kim DH. Prevalence of autoimmune antibodies in type i diabetic children and their siblings. J Korean Soc Pediatr Endocrinol. 1999; 4:78–87.
13. Ludvigsson J, Faresjo M, Hjorth M, Axelsson S, Cheramy M, Pihl M, et al. GAD treatment and insulin secretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359:1909–1920. PMID: 18843118.
14. Hong EH, Park JS, Lee HS, Cho MH, Ko CW. Clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of children who were newly diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (from 2001 to 2008). J Korean Soc Pediatr Endocrinol. 2009; 14:110–115.
15. D'Adamo E, Caprio S. Type 2 diabetes in youth: epidemiology and pathophysiology. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34(Suppl 2):S161–S165. PMID: 21525449.
16. Park J, Oh J, Yu J. Autoantibody positivity and clinical characteristics of diabetes mellitus in childhood. J Korean Soc Pediatr Endocrinol. 2011; 16:119–127.
Article
17. Yu J, Jin H, Ko J, Kang H. A case of severe diabetic ketoacidosis in a child with type 2 diabetes. J Korean Soc Pediatr Endocrinol. 2011; 16:46–50.
Article
18. Seo JY, Bae SH, Woo YJ, Kim CJ. The precipitating factor and clinical features of diabetic ketoacidosis. Chonnam Med J. 2010; 46:94–98.
Article
19. Kang S, Kim S, Lee J. Prevalence rates and risk factors of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: using Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005 data. Korean J Epidemiol. 2008; 30:188–197.
Article
20. Choi J, Ko JM, Lee JH, Choi JH, Yoo HW. Clinical characteristics of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. J Korean Soc Pediatr Endocrinol. 2006; 11:64–69.
21. Kordonouri O, Hartmann R, Gruters-Kieslich A, Knip M, Danne T. Age-specific levels of diabetes-related GAD and IA-2 antibodies in healthy children and adults. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 15:47–52. PMID: 11822579.
Article
22. Betterle C, Lazzarotto F, Fusari A, Zanchetta R, Benedini S, Pedini B, et al. Pancreatic autoantibodies in Italian patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus over the age of 20 years. Acta Diabetol. 2006; 43:79–83. PMID: 17143785.
Article
23. Buckley CE 3rd, Dorsey FC. Serum immunoglobulin levels throughout the life-span of healthy man. Ann Intern Med. 1971; 75:673–682. PMID: 5122154.
Article
24. Lee SH, Yoon JS, Eun MJ, Kim JH, Park YH, Won KC, et al. Five year follow-up of ICA and GADA in childhood onset type 1 DM. J Korean Diabetes Assoc. 2003; 27:395–404.
25. Park YS. Prospective follow-up of autoantibody prevalences in patients with type 1 diabetes. J Korean Diabetes Assoc. 2003; 27:391–394.
26. Decochez K, Tits J, Coolens JL, Van Gaal L, Krzentowski G, Winnock F, et al. High frequency of persisting or increasing islet-specific autoantibody levels after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes presenting before 40 years of age. The Belgian Diabetes Registry. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23:838–844. PMID: 10841006.
Article
27. Asplin CM, Hartog M, Goldie DJ, Alberti KG, Smythe P, Binder C, et al. A comparison between diabetics receiving a high or low daily insulin dosage. Horm Metab Res. 1978; 10:365–369. PMID: 568594.
Article
28. Francis AJ, Hanning I, Alberti KG. The influence of insulin antibody levels on the plasma profiles and action of subcutaneously injected human and bovine short acting insulins. Diabetologia. 1985; 28:330–334. PMID: 3899818.
Article
29. Lee K, Lee SY, Song CK, Jung MH, Yi KH, Hong JY, et al. Factors associated with the development of anti-insulin antibody in diabetic children. J Korean Soc Pediatr Endocrinol. 2000; 5:100–106.
30. Kurtz AB, Nabarro JD. Circulating insulin-binding antibodies. Diabetologia. 1980; 19:329–334. PMID: 7000597.
Article
Full Text Links
  • APEM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr