J Korean Soc Spine Surg.  2002 Sep;9(3):178-183. 10.4184/jkss.2002.9.3.178.

Clinical and Radiologic Factors Predicting the Low Back Pain after Discectomy

• Koh YD
• Kim DJ
• Kim JO
• Wang JM
• Bae SY
• Chang SY

• KMID: 2003222
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4184/jkss.2002.9.3.178

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis to evaluate predictive factors of low back pain after discectomy in lumbar disc herniation.
OBJECTIVE
We analysed clinical and radiological predictive factors which possibly contribute to postoperative low back pain in herniated lumbar disc disease. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: There was no statistically significant factors which contribute to postoperative low back pain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ninety two patients with herniated lumbar disc who were treated by one level simple discectomy from June 1995 to June 2000 were included in this study. They were divided into two groups by severity of postoperative low back pain, back pain group and no back pain group. We analyzed clinical and radiological factors retrospectively in each group by medical records, preoperative radiographs and telephone interview. Then statistical analysis was performed with Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. Confidence interval was 95%.
RESULTS
Eighteen patients (19.6%) were in back pain group and seventy four patients (80.4%) were in no back pain group. Among patients over 50 years old and below 50 years old, the ratio of low back pain after discectomy was 33% and 13.8% respectively (Odds ratio=3.1, confidence interval 1.07~9.03). It was proved statistically that except age factor, such factors as follows did not affect postoperative lower back pain. Sex, smoking, preceeding low back pain before discectomy, level of discectomy, disc space narrowing, bony spur, grade of disc degeneration, presence of high intensity zone of disc.
CONCLUSIONS
There was no other significant predictive factors of post-discectomy low back pain than the age over 50 years old.

Keyword

Lumbar spine; Herniated disc disease; Discectomy; Low back pain; Predictive factor

MeSH Terms

Age Factors
Back Pain
Diskectomy*
Humans
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Interviews as Topic
Logistic Models
Low Back Pain*
Medical Records
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Smoke
Smoking
Smoke

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. age distribution characteristics in each group

Reference

1). Astrand P, Maattanen H, Vucetic N, Svensson O. Pain and orthopaedic and neurologic signs after lumbar discectomy: a 2-year followup. Clin Orthop. 379:154–160. 2000.

2). Clapham LM, Buckley J. Outcome-directed clinical practice in lumbar spine surgery. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 7-. 4:167–171. 1999.

3). Dabbs VM, Dabbs LG. Correlation between disc height narrowing and low-back pain. Spine. 15:1366–1369. 1990.

4). Finneson BE. Low back pain. 2nd Ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co;320-326. 1980.

5). Hurme M, Alanranta H. Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine. 12:933–938. 1987.

6). Kang CN, Kim JO, KIm DW, Koh YD, Koh SH, Bang HC. Analysis of prognostic factors in surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation. J Korean Orthop Assoc,32-. 4:1090–1097. 1997.

7). Kim DJ, Wang JM. Significance of the high-intensi -ty zone (HIZ) on magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of the internal disc disruption. J of Korean Spine Surg,6-. 3:451–457. 1999.

8). Manniche C, Asmussen KH, Vinterberg H, Hansen EB, Kramhoft J, Jordan A. Analysis of preoperative prognostic factors in first-time surgery for lumbar disc herniation, including Finneson's and modified Spengler's score systems. Dan Med Bull. 41:110–115. 1994.

9). Nah HY, Kim YT, Ahn HS, KIm KY. Lumbar intervertebral disc: a histologic, radiologic and clinical correlations based on over 95 discectomies. J of Korean Spine Surg, 1-. 1:66–73. 1994.

10). Nakano M, Matsui H, Ishihara H, Kawaguchi Y, Gejo R, Hirano N. Serial changes of herniated intervertebral discs after posterior lumbar discectomy: the relation between magnaetic resonance imaging of the postoperative intervertebral discs and clinical outcome. J Spinal Disord,14-. 4:293–300. 2001.

11). Park BM, Kim NH, Kwon SW, Yang KH. A clinical study of the operative treatment of the herniated lumbar disc. J of Korean Orthop Assoc, 19-. 1:41–48. 1984.

12). Roh YW, Kim BK, Kwak MH, Lee KJ. Analysis of operative treatment and the outcome of the lumbar disc surgery in lumbar disc herniation. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 18:1–7. 1983.

13). Scott SC, Goldberg MS, Mayo NE, Stock SR, Poitras B. The association between cigarette smoking and back pain in adults. Spine. 24:1090–1098. 1999.

14). Shin BJ, Kim KJ, Jang IK, Suh YS, Kim YI. Early problems of open discectomy f for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. J of Korean Spine Surg, 6-. 1:104–109. 1999.

15). Takeshima T, Kmbara K, Miyyata S, Ueda Y, Tamai S. Clinical and radiolographic evaluation of disc excision for lumbar disc herniation with or without posterolateral fusion. Spine. 25:450–456. 2000.

16). Wang JM, Kim DJ. Diagnostic value of image findings of MRI for the internal disc disruption. J of Korean Spine Surg, 4-. 1:36–42. 1997.

17). Weber H. Lumbar disc herniation: a controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine. 8:131–140. 1983.

18). Weir BK. Prospective study of 100 lumbosacral discectomies. J Neurosurg. 50:238–239. 1979.

19). Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Yoyama Y, Hirabayashi K. Longterm outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a followup study os more than 10 years. Spine, 15-. 26:652–657. 2001.