Korean J Spine.  2013 Dec;10(4):232-236. 10.14245/kjs.2013.10.4.232.

Slip Reduction Rate between Minimal Invasive and Conventional Unilateral Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in Patients with Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis

• Oh CH
• Ji GY
• Jeon JK
• Lee J
• Yoon SH
• Hyun DK

• KMID: 1916603
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2013.10.4.232

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
To compare the slip reduction rate and clinical outcomes between unilateral conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (conventional TLIF) and unilateral minimal invasive TLIF (minimal TLIF) with pedicle screw fixation for treatment of one level low-grade symptomatic isthmic spondylolisthesis.
METHODS
Between February 2008 and April 2012, 25 patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis underwent conventional TLIF (12 patients) and minimal TLIF (13 patients) in single university hospital by a single surgeon. Lateral radiographs of lumbar spine were taken 12 months after surgery to analyze the degree of slip reduction and the clinical outcome. All measurements were performed by a single observer.
RESULTS
The demographic data between conventional TLIF and minimal TLIF were not different. Slip percentage was reduced from 15.00% to 8.33% in conventional TLIF, and from 14.15% to 9.62% in minimal TLIF. In both groups, slip percentage was significantly improved postoperatively (p=0.002), but no significant intergroup differences of slip percentage in preoperative and postoperative were found. The reduction rate also not different between conventional TLIF (45.41+/-28.80%) and minimal TLIF (32.91+/-32.12%, p=0.318).
CONCLUSION
Conventional TLIF and minimal TLIF with pedicle screw fixation showed good slip reduction in patients with one level low-grade symptomatic isthmic spondylolisthesis. The slip percentage and reduction rate were similar in the conventional TLIF and minimal TLIF.

Keyword

Slip percentage; Reduction rate; Conventional; Minimal invasive; Transforamenal lumbar interbody fusion

MeSH Terms

Humans
Spine
Spondylolisthesis*