J Korean Med Sci.  2008 Jun;23(3):414-420. 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.3.414.

Prognostic Significance of HER2 Gene Amplification According to Stage of Breast Cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. wcpark@catholic.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

It is well known that the amplification of the HER2 gene is closely associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer. However, there is controversy about the clinical significance of HER2 according to lymph node status in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to identify the differences in the prognostic significance of HER2 gene amplification according to the stages of breast cancer. We prepared a tissue array for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with breast cancer specimens from the surgery in 1994 to 1999. Total 338 cases of breast cancer were enrolled and the median follow-up period was 6.3 yr. The detection rates of HER2 gene amplification were as follows: 10.3% in stage I, 22.3% in stage II, and 43.8% in stage III. On survival analyses HER2-positive groups showed worse prognosis in stage III of breast cancer, but not in stage I or II. Multivariate analyses with a Cox-regression model also revealed that HER2 amplification was an independent prognostic factor only in stage III breast cancer. Regarding HER2 gene amplification as a prognostic factor of breast cancer, the clinical significance of the gene was found to be confined to advanced breast cancer.

Keyword

Breast Neoplasms; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Genes, erbB-2; Prognosis

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Breast Neoplasms/*genetics/mortality/*pathology
Disease Progression
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gene Amplification
Genes, erbB-2/*genetics
Humans
*In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Tumor Markers, Biological/genetics

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Disease-free survival (DFS) curves according to the stages of breast cancer. (A) stage I (B) stage II (C) stage III. Statistical significance between HER2 gene amplification -positive group (solid line) and -negative group (dotted line) was noted only in stage III of breast cancer.

  • Fig. 2 Overall survival (OS) curves according to the stages of breast cancer. (A) stage I (B) stage II (C) stage III. Statistical significance between HER2 gene amplification -positive group (solid line) and -negative group (dotted line) was noted only in stage III of breast cancer.


Reference

1. Veronesi U, Viale G, Rotmensz N, Goldhirsch A. Rethinking TNM: Breast cancer TNM classification for treatment decision-making and research. Breast. 2006. 15:3–8.
Article
2. Dykins R, Corbett IP, Henry JA, Wright C, Yuan J, Hennessy C, Lennard TJ, Angus B, Horne CH. Long-term survival in breast cancer related to overexpression of the c-erbB-2 oncoprotein: an immunohistochemical study using monoclonal antibody NCL-CB11. J Pathol. 1991. 163:105–110.
Article
3. Andrulis IL, Bull SB, Blackstein ME, Sutherland D, Mak C, Sidlofsky S, Pritzker KP, Hartwick RW, Hanna W, Lickley L, Wilkinson R, Qizilbash A, Ambus U, Lipa M, Weizel H, Katz A, Baida M, Mariz S, Stoik G, Dacamara P, Strongitharm D, Geddie W, McCready D. neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer. Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998. 16:1340–1349.
Article
4. Hartmann LC, Ingle JN, Wold LE, Farr GH Jr, Grill JP, Su JQ, Maihle NJ, Krook JE, Witzig TE, Roche PC. Prognostic value of c-erbB2 overexpression in axillary lymph node positive breast cancer. Results from a randomized adjuvant treatment protocol. Cancer. 1994. 74:2956–2963.
Article
5. Press MF, Pike MC, Chazin VR, Hung G, Udove JA, Markowicz M, Danyluk J, Godolphin W, Sliwkowski M, Akita R, Paterson MC, Slammon DJ. Her-2/neu expression in node-negative breast cancer: direct tissue quantitation by computerized image analysis and association of overexpression with increased risk of recurrent disease. Cancer Res. 1993. 53:4960–4970.
6. Seshadri R, Firgaira FA, Horsfall DJ, McCaul K, Setlur V, Kitchen P. Clinical significance of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in primary breast cancer. The South Australian Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1993. 11:1936–1942.
Article
7. Tetu B, Brisson J. Prognostic significance of HER-2/neu oncoprotein expression in node-positive breast cancer. The influence of the pattern of immunostaining and adjuvant therapy. Cancer. 1994. 73:2359–2365.
Article
8. Bianchi S, Paglierani M, Zampi G, Cardona G, Cataliotti L, Bonardi R, Ciatto S. Prognostic significance of c-erbB-2 expression in node negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1993. 67:625–629.
Article
9. Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, Suman VJ, Geyer CE Jr, Davidson NE, Tan-Chiu E, Martino S, Paik S, Kaufman PA, Swain SM, Pisansky TM, Fehrenbacher L, Kutteh LA, Vogel VG, Visscher DW, Yothers G, Jenkins RB, Brown AM, Dakhil SR, Mamounas EP, Lingle WL, Klein PM, Ingle JN, Wolmark N. Trastzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005. 353:1673–1684.
10. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, Goldhirsch A, Untch M, Smith I, Gianni L, Baselga J, Bell R, Jackisch C, Cameron D, Dowsett M, Barrios CH, Steger G, Huang CS, Andersson M, Inbar M, Lichinitser M, Láng I, Nitz U, Iwata H, Thomssen C, Lohrisch C, Suter TM, Rüschoff J, Suto T, Greatorex V, Ward C, Straehle C, McFadden E, Dolci MS, Gelber RD; Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) Trial Study Team. Trastzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005. 353:1659–1672.
11. Ellis CM, Dyson MJ, Stephenson TJ, Maltby EL. HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fuorescence in situ hybridization using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques. J Clin Pathol. 2005. 58:710–714.
12. Press MF, Bernstein L, Thomas PA, Meisner LF, Zhou JY, Ma Y, Hung G, Robinson RA, Harris C, El-Naggar A, Slamon DJ, Phillips RN, Ross JS, Wolman SR, Flom KJ. HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 1997. 15:2894–2904.
Article
13. Ratcliffe N, Wells W, Wheeler K, Memoli V. The combination of in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis: an evaluation of Her2/neu expression in paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas and adjacent normal-appearing breast epithelium. Mod Pathol. 1997. 10:1247–1252.
14. Kallioniemi OP, Kallioniemi A, Kurisu W, Thor A, Chen LC, Smith HS, Waldman FM, Pinkel D, Gray JW. ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992. 89:5321–5325.
Article
15. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987. 235:177–182.
Article
16. Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, Holt JA, Wong SG, Keith DE, Levin WJ, Stuart SG, Udove J, Ullrich A, Press MF. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989. 244:707–712.
Article
17. Thor AD, Schwartz LH, Koerner FC, Edgerton SM, Skates SJ, Yin S, McKenzie SJ, Panicali DL, Marks PJ, Fingert HJ, Wood WC. Analysis of c-erbB-2 expression in breast carcinomas with clinical follow-up. Cancer Res. 1989. 49:7147–7152.
18. Revillion F, Bonneterre J, Peyrat JP. ERBB2 oncogene in human breast cancer and its clinical significance. Eur J Cancer. 1998. 34:791–808.
19. Ross JS, Fletcher JA. The HER-2/neu oncogene in breast cancer: prognostic factor, predictive factor, and target for therapy. Stem Cells. 1998. 16:413–428.
20. Tagliabue E, Menard S, Robertson JF, Harris L. c-erbB-2 expression in primary breast cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 1999. 14:16–26.
Article
21. Tandon AK, Clark GM, Chamness GC, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. HER-2/neu oncogene protein and prognosis in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1989. 7:1120–1128.
Article
22. Mylonas I, Makovitzky J, Jeschke U, Briese V, Friese K, Gerber B. Expression of Her2/neu, steroid receptors (ER and PR), Ki67 and p53 in invasive mammary ductal carcinoma associated with ductal carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Versus invasive breast cancer alone. Anticancer Res. 2005. 25:1719–1723.
23. Borg A, Tandon AK, Sigurdsson H, Clark GM, Ferno M, Fuqua SA, Killander D, McGuire WL. HER-2/neu amplification predicts poor survival in node-positive breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1990. 50:4332–4337.
24. Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Arroyo CD, Cranor M, Borgan P, Norton L. Immunohistochemical detection of HER-2/neu in patients with axillary lymph node negative breast carcinoma. A study of epidemiologic risk factors, histologic features, and prognosis. Cancer. 1995. 75:1320–1326.
25. Reed W, Hannisdal E, Boehler PJ, Gundersen S, Host H, Marthin J. The prognostic value of p53 and C-erb-B2 immunostaining is overrated for patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma?: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in 613 patients with a follow up of 14-30 years. Cancer. 2000. 88:804–813.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr