J Bacteriol Virol.  2013 Mar;43(1):9-17. 10.4167/jbv.2013.43.1.9.

Cell Culture-based Influenza Vaccines as Alternatives to Egg-based Vaccines

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, Korea. ms0392@hallym.ac.kr
  • 2Center for Medical Science Research, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, Korea.

Abstract

Influenza viruses have raised public health concerns by seasonal epidemics and intermittent pandemics. Vaccination is considered as the most effective method for preventing influenza infection in humans. Current influenza vaccines are mostly produced in fertile chicken eggs. However, disadvantages of egg-based vaccines, such as egg dependency, labor-intensive manufacturing system, and huddle for large-scale output, allow us to make an alternative method. A cell-culture platform may be a fine alternative for the next generation vaccine technique. Compared with a classical egg-based method, cell-grown vaccines provide stable pipeline even in the pandemic situation with shorter lead-in times. In addition, cell-grown vaccines are flexible for altering production scales because stocked cell batches can be easily sub-cultured in large quantity without worrying avian diseases and a resultant decrease in egg production. By World Health Organization, MDCK, PER.C6, and Vero cells are only recommended for manufacturing influenza vaccines. In this review, we discuss the necessity, immunogenicity, and efficacy of cell-grown influenza vaccines compared with egg-based vaccines.

Keyword

Egg; Influenza; MDCK; Vaccine; Vero

MeSH Terms

Animals
Bird Diseases
Chickens
Dependency (Psychology)
Eggs
Humans
Influenza Vaccines
Influenza, Human
Orthomyxoviridae
Ovum
Pandemics
Public Health
Seasons
Vaccination
Vaccines
Vero Cells
Weights and Measures
World Health Organization
Influenza Vaccines
Vaccines

Figure

  • Figure 1. A new paradigm for next generation of influenza vaccine. Cell culture-based influenza vaccine is challenging to issues caused by egg-based influenza vaccine.


Cited by  2 articles

Strategy for Developing Medical Arsenals by Modulation of Membrane Fusion Activity of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin
Sangmoo Lee, Jin Il Kim, Ilseob Lee, Man-Seong Park
J Bacteriol Virol. 2013;43(4):337-341.    doi: 10.4167/jbv.2013.43.4.337.

Is Obesity One of Physiological Factors which Exert Influenza Virus-induced Pathology and Vaccine Efficacy?
Whajung Cho, Jae-Hwan Nam
J Bacteriol Virol. 2014;44(3):226-235.    doi: 10.4167/jbv.2014.44.3.226.


Reference

1). Lee I, Kim JI, Park MS. A Novel PA-X Protein Translated from Influenza A Virus Segment 3. J Bacteriol Virol. 2012; 42:368–71.
Article
2). Tong S, Li Y, Rivailler P, Conrardy C, Castillo DA, Chen LM, et al. A distinct lineage of influenza A virus from bats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109:4269–74.
Article
3). WHO. Fact sheet on influenza. 2009.
4). Klenk HD, Garten W, Matrosovich M. Molecular mechanisms of interspecies transmission and pathogenicity of influenza viruses: Lessons from the 2009 pandemic. Bioessays. 2011; 33:180–8.
Article
5). WHO. Cumulative number of confirmed human cases of avian influenza A (H5N1) reported to WHO. 2012.
6). Park S, Kim JI, Park MS. Antiviral Agents Against Influenza Viruses. J Bacteriol Virol. 2012; 42:284–93.
Article
7). Cox NJ, Subbarao K. Influenza. Lancet. 1999; 354:1277–82.
Article
8). Kim JI, Park MS. An Universal Approach to Getting Ahead for Influenza B Vaccines. J Bacteriol Virol. 2012; 42:363–7.
Article
9). Traynor K. First quadrivalent flu vaccine approved. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012; 69:538.
Article
10). WHO. A description of the process of seasonal and H5N1 influenza vaccine virus selection and development. 2007.
11). Nicholson KG WR, Hay AJ. Textbook of Influenza. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.;1998.
12). WHO. Cell culture as a substrate for the production of influenza vaccines: memorandum from a WHO meeting. Bull World Health Organ. 1995; 73:431–5.
13). Magrath DI. Safety of vaccines produced in continuous cell lines. Dev Biol Stand. 1991; 75:17–20.
14). Merten OW, Hannoun C, Manuguerra JC, Ventre F, Petres S. Production of influenza virus in cell cultures for vaccine preparation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1996; 397:141–51.
Article
15). Tannock GA, Bryce DA, Paul JA. Evaluation of chicken kidney and chicken embryo kidney cultures for the large-scale growth of attenuated influenza virus master strain A/Ann/Arbor/6/60-ca. Vaccine. 1985; 3:333–9.
Article
16). Kistner O, Barrett PN, Mundt W, Reiter M, Schober-Bendixen S, Dorner F. Development of a mammalian cell (Vero) derived candidate influenza virus vaccine. Vaccine. 1998; 16:960–8.
Article
17). PATH. Influenza Vaccine Strategies for Broad Global Access. www.oliverwyman.com/media/VAC_infl_publ_rpt_10-07.pdf. 2007.
18). Feng SZ, Jiao PR, Qi WB, Fan HY, Liao M. Development and strategies of cell-culture technology for influenza vaccine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 89:893–902.
Article
19). Gerdil C. The annual production cycle for influenza vaccine. Vaccine. 2003; 21:1776–9.
Article
20). WHO. World now at the start of 2009 influenza pandemic. 2009.
21). Pandey A, Singh N, Sambhara S, Mittal SK. Egg-independent vaccine strategies for highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses. Hum Vaccin. 2010; 6:178–88.
Article
22). Robertson JS, Naeve CW, Webster RG, Bootman JS, Newman R, Schild GC. Alterations in the hemagglutinin associated with adaptation of influenza B virus to growth in eggs. Virology. 1985; 143:166–74.
Article
23). Oxford JS, Schild GC, Corcoran T, Newman R, Major D, Robertson J, et al. A host-cell-selected variant of influenza B virus with a single nucleotide substitution in HA affecting a potential glycosylation site was attenuated in virulence for volunteers. Arch Virol. 1990; 110:37–46.
24). Oxford JS, Corcoran T, Knott R, Bates J, Bartolomei O, Major D, et al. Serological studies with influenza A(H1N1) viruses cultivated in eggs or in a canine kidney cell line (MDCK). Bull World Health Organ. 1987; 65:181–7.
25). Katz JM, Webster RG. Amino acid sequence identity between the HA1 of influenza A (H3N2) viruses grown in mammalian and primary chick kidney cells. J Gen Virol. 1992; 73:1159–65.
Article
26). Katz JM, Wang M, Webster RG. Direct sequencing of the HA gene of influenza (H3N2) virus in original clinical samples reveals sequence identity with mammalian cell-grown virus. J Virol. 1990; 64:1808–11.
Article
27). James JM, Zeiger RS, Lester MR, Fasano MB, Gern JE, Mansfield LE, et al. Safe administration of influenza vaccine to patients with egg allergy. J Pediatr. 1998; 133:624–8.
Article
28). WHO. Use of Cell Lines for the Production of Influenza Virus Vaccines: An Appraisal of Technical, Manufacturing, and Regulatory Considerations. 2007.
29). Barrett PN, Mundt W, Kistner O, Howard MK. Vero cell platform in vaccine production: moving towards cell culture-based viral vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009; 8:607–18.
Article
30). U.S. Health and Human Services. HHS Awards Contracts Totaling More Than $1 Billion To Develop Cell-Based Influenza Vaccine. 2006.
31). U.S. Health and Human Services. HHS Awards $487 Million Contract to Build First U.S. Manufacturing Facility for Cell-Based Influenza Vaccine. 2009.
32). Montagnon BJ, Fanget B, Nicolas AJ. The large-scale cultivation of VERO cells in micro-carrier culture for virus vaccine production. Preliminary results for killed poliovirus vaccine. Dev Biol Stand. 1981; 47:55–64.
33). SanofiPasteur. Our vaccines: a history of innovation. www.sanofipasteur.com/index.jsp?codeRubrique=14&lang=EN.
34). Montagnon BJ. Polio and rabies vaccines produced in continuous cell lines: a reality for Vero cell line. Dev Biol Stand. 1989; 70:27–47.
35). Schuller E, Jilma B, Voicu V, Golor G, Kollaritsch H, Kaltenböck A, et al. Long-term immunogenicity of the new Vero cell-derived, inactivated Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine IC51 Six and 12 month results of a multicenter follow-up phase 3 study. Vaccine. 2008; 26:4382–6.
36). Tauber E, Kollaritsch H, von Sonnenburg F, Lademann M, Jilma B, Firbas C, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of the safety and tolerability of IC51, an inactivated Japanese encephalitis vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2008; 198:493–9.
Article
37). Tauber E, Kollaritsch H, Korinek M, Rendi-Wagner P, Jilma B, Firbas C, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a Vero-cell-derived, inactivated Japanese encephalitis vaccine: a non-inferiority, phase III, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007; 370:1847–53.
Article
38). Lyons A, Kanesa-thasan N, Kuschner RA, Eckels KH, Putnak R, Sun W, et al. A Phase 2 study of a purified, inactivated virus vaccine to prevent Japanese encephalitis. Vaccine. 2007; 25:3445–53.
Article
39). Dennehy PH. Rotavirus vaccines: an overview. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008; 21:198–208.
Article
40). Lau SC, Scholtissek C. Abortive infection of Vero cells by an influenza A virus (FPV). Virology. 1995; 212:225–31.
Article
41). Nakamura K, Homma M. Protein synthesis in Vero cells abortively infected with influenza B virus. J Gen Virol. 1981; 56:199–202.
Article
42). Govorkova EA, Kaverin NV, Gubareva LV, Meignier B, Webster RG. Replication of influenza A viruses in a green monkey kidney continuous cell line (Vero). J Infect Dis. 1995; 172:250–3.
Article
43). Kaverin NV, Webster RG. Impairment of multicycle influenza virus growth in Vero (WHO) cells by loss of trypsin activity. J Virol. 1995; 69:2700–3.
Article
44). Govorkova EA, Murti G, Meignier B, de Taisne C, Webster RG. African green monkey kidney (Vero) cells provide an alternative host cell system for influenza A and B viruses. J Virol. 1996; 70:5519–24.
Article
45). Baxter. Baxter Receives European Commission Approval for CELVAPAN H1N1 Pandemic Influenza Vaccine. 2009.
46). Baxter. Baxter Receives EMEA Positive Opinion for CELVAPAN, the First Cell Culture-based Pandemic Flu Vaccine. 2008.
47). Minor PD, Engelhardt OG, Wood JM, Robertson JS, Blayer S, Colegate T, et al. Current challenges in implementing cell-derived influenza vaccines: implications for production and regulation, July 2007, NIBSC, Potters Bar, UK. Vaccine. 2009; 27:2907–13.
Article
48). Tree JA, Richardson C, Fooks AR, Clegg JC, Looby D. Comparison of large-scale mammalian cell culture systems with egg culture for the production of influenza virus A vaccine strains. Vaccine. 2001; 19:3444–50.
Article
49). Liu J, Shi X, Schwartz R, Kemble G. Use of MDCK cells for production of live attenuated influenza vaccine. Vaccine. 2009; 27:6460–3.
Article
50). Genzel Y, Reichl U. Continuous cell lines as a production system for influenza vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009; 8:1681–92.
Article
51). Liu J, Mani S, Schwartz R, Richman L, Tabor DE. Cloning and assessment of tumorigenicity and oncogenicity of a Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell line for influenza vaccine production. Vaccine. 2010; 28:1285–93.
Article
52). Novartis. Novartis receives FDA approval for Flucelvax®, the first cell-culture vaccine in US to help protect against seasonal influenza. 2012.
53). Pau MG, Ophorst C, Koldijk MH, Schouten G, Mehtali M, Uytdehaag F. The human cell line PER.C6 provides a new manufacturing system for the production of influenza vaccines. Vaccine. 2001; 19:2716–21.
Article
54). Cox RJ, Madhun AS, Hauge S, Sjursen H, Major D, Kuhne M, et al. A phase I clinical trial of a PER.C6 cell grown influenza H7 virus vaccine. Vaccine. 2009; 27:1889–97.
Article
55). Ledwith BJ, Lanning CL, Gumprecht LA, Anderson CA, Coleman JB, Gatto NT, et al. Tumorigenicity assessments of Per.C6 cells and of an Ad5-vectored HIV-1 vaccine produced on this continuous cell line. Dev Biol (Basel). 2006; 123:251–63.
56). Zhang W, Xue T, Wu X, Zhang P, Zhao G, Peng D, et al. Increase in viral yield in eggs and MDCK cells of reassortant H5N1 vaccine candidate viruses caused by insertion of 38 amino acids into the NA stalk. Vaccine. 2011; 29:8032–41.
Article
57). Tseng YF, Hu AY, Huang ML, Yeh WZ, Weng TC, Chen YS, et al. Adaptation of high-growth influenza H5N1 vaccine virus in Vero cells: implications for pandemic preparedness. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e24057.
Article
58). Murakami S, Horimoto T, Ito M, Takano R, Katsura H, Shimojima M, et al. Enhanced growth of influenza vaccine seed viruses in vero cells mediated by broadening the optimal pH range for virus membrane fusion. J Virol. 2012; 86:1405–10.
Article
59). Szymczakiewicz-Multanowska A, Groth N, Bugarini R, Lattanzi M, Casula D, Hilbert A, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a novel influenza subunit vaccine produced in mammalian cell culture. J Infect Dis. 2009; 200:841–8.
Article
60). Reisinger KS, Block SL, Izu A, Groth N, Holmes SJ. Subunit influenza vaccines produced from cell culture or in embryonated chicken eggs: comparison of safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity. J Infect Dis. 2009; 200:849–57.
Article
61). Groth N, Montomoli E, Gentile C, Manini I, Bugarini R, Podda A. Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of a mammalian cell-culture-derived influenza vaccine: a sequential Phase I and Phase II clinical trial. Vaccine. 2009; 27:786–91.
Article
62). Hatz C, Cramer JP, Vertruyen A, Schwarz TF, von Sonnenburg F, Borkowski A, et al. A randomised, single-blind, dose-range study to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a cell-culture-derived A/H1N1 influenza vaccine in adult and elderly populations. Vaccine. 2012; 30:4820–7.
Article
63). Ehrlich HJ, Müller M, Oh HM, Tambyah PA, Joukhadar C, Montomoli E, et al. A clinical trial of a whole-virus H5N1 vaccine derived from cell culture. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:2573–84.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBV
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr