Yonsei Med J.  2012 Jan;53(1):83-90. 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.1.83.

Early Experience Using a Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Cardiology, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea. hnpak@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Cardiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Cardiology, Korea University Cardiovascular Center, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the major risk factors for ischemic stroke, and 90% of thromboembolisms in these patients arise from the left atrial appendage (LAA). Recently, it has been documented that an LAA occlusion device (OD) is not inferior to warfarin therapy, and that it reduces mortality and risk of stroke in patients with AF.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We implanted LAA-ODs in 5 Korean patients (all male, 59.8+/-7.3 years old) with long-standing persistent AF or permanent AF via a percutaneous trans-septal approach.
RESULTS
1) The major reasons for LAA-OD implantation were high risk of recurrent stroke (80%), labile international neutralizing ratio with hemorrhage (60%), and 3/5 (60%) patients had a past history of failed cardioversion for rhythm control. 2) The mean LA size was 51.3+/-5.0 mm and LAA size was 25.1x30.1 mm. We implanted the LAA-OD (28.8+/-3.4 mm device) successfully in all 5 patients with no complications. 3) After eight weeks of anticoagulation, all patients switched from warfarin to anti-platelet agent after confirmation of successful LAA occlusion by trans-esophageal echocardiography.
CONCLUSION
We report on our early experience with LAA-OD deployment in patients with 1) persistent or permanent AF who cannot tolerate anticoagulation despite significant risk of ischemic stroke, or 2) recurrent stroke in patients who are unable to maintain sinus rhythm.

Keyword

Atrial fibrillation; left atrial appendage; occlusion device; thromboembolism

MeSH Terms

Aged
Anticoagulants/contraindications
Atrial Appendage/*physiopathology
Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology/*physiopathology/*surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Risk Factors
*Septal Occluder Device
Stroke/epidemiology/*prevention & control
Treatment Outcome
Warfarin/contraindications

Figure

  • Fig. 1 LAA occlusion device. (A, B and C) Delivery catheter (A) including folded WATCHMAN device inside the catheter lumen (B) connected to the deployment knob (C) and detachable by being unscrewed. (D) Trans-septal sheath has multiple radio-opaque marker bands that indicate the locations of delivery catheter and LAA ostium. (E and F) WATCHMAN device is unfolded by elastic recoil outside of delivery sheath (E) and remains in LAA after being detached from the delivery catheter (F). LAA, left atrial appendage.

  • Fig. 2 Intra-procedural TEE images before (A, B and C) and after (D) deployment of LAA occlusion device. Diameter of LAA ostium and depth of LAA were measured from 4 different angles of TEE images to determine the appropriate size of WATCHMAN device. (D) Successful deployment of device should be confirmed using a tug test and color Doppler. (E) RAO 45° fluoroscopic view after deployment of WATCHMAN device. (F) Eight week follow-up 3-D TEE showed complete sealing off of LAA by WATCHMAN device. TEE, trans-esophageal echocardiography; LAA, left atrial appendage; RAO, right anterior oblique.

  • Fig. 3 Warfarin dosage and INR values of case 1. INR values were extremely labile, and ischemic stroke occurred 9 months after switching to clopidogrel. INR, international neutralizing ratio; MCA, middle cerebral artery.


Cited by  2 articles

Characteristics of Pulmonary Vein Enlargement in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Stroke
Jung Myung Lee, Jong-Youn Kim, Jaemin Shim, Jae-Sun Uhm, Young Jin Kim, Hye-Jeong Lee, Hui-Nam Pak, Moon-Hyoung Lee, Boyoung Joung
Yonsei Med J. 2014;55(6):1516-1525.    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.6.1516.

Simultaneous Closure of a Left Atrial Appendage through an Atrial Septal Defect and the Atrial Septal Defect
Shinjeong Song, Oh-Hyun Lee, Jung-Sun Kim, In-Jeong Cho, Chi-Young Shim, Geu-Ru Hong, Hui-Nam Pak, Yangsoo Jang
Yonsei Med J. 2017;58(6):1237-1240.    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.6.1237.


Reference

1. Kannel WB, Abbott RD, Savage DD, McNamara PM. Epidemiologic features of chronic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med. 1982. 306:1018–1022.
Article
2. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001. 285:2370–2375.
Article
3. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991. 22:983–988.
Article
4. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998. 98:946–952.
5. Stoddard MF, Dawkins PR, Prince CR, Ammash NM. Left atrial appendage thrombus is not uncommon in patients with acute atrial fibrillation and a recent embolic event: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995. 25:452–459.
Article
6. Manning WJ, Weintraub RM, Waksmonski CA, Haering JM, Rooney PS, Maslow AD, et al. Accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography for identifying left atrial thrombi. A prospective, intraoperative study. Ann Intern Med. 1995. 123:817–822.
Article
7. Leung DY, Black IW, Cranney GB, Hopkins AP, Walsh WF. Prognostic implications of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994. 24:755–762.
Article
8. Singer DE, Chang Y, Fang MC, Borowsky LH, Pomernacki NK, Udaltsova N, et al. The net clinical benefit of warfarin anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2009. 151:297–305.
Article
9. Corley SD, Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Geller N, Greene HL, et al. Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study. Circulation. 2004. 109:1509–1513.
Article
10. Petersen P, Boysen G, Godtfredsen J, Andersen ED, Andersen B. Placebo-controlled, randomised trial of warfarin and aspirin for prevention of thromboembolic complications in chronic atrial fibrillation. The Copenhagen AFASAK study. Lancet. 1989. 1:175–179.
11. Hylek EM, D'Antonio J, Evans-Molina C, Shea C, Henault LE, Regan S. Translating the results of randomized trials into clinical practice: the challenge of warfarin candidacy among hospitalized elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2006. 37:1075–1080.
Article
12. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009. 361:1139–1151.
Article
13. Connolly S, Pogue J, Hart R, Pfeffer M, Hohnloser S, Chrolavicius S, et al. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006. 367:1903–1912.
Article
14. Go AS, Hylek EM, Borowsky LH, Phillips KA, Selby JV, Singer DE. Warfarin use among ambulatory patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: the anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation (ATRIA) study. Ann Intern Med. 1999. 131:927–934.
Article
15. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S, et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Europace. 2010. 12:1360–1420.
16. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2008. 118:e523–e661.
17. Healey JS, Crystal E, Lamy A, Teoh K, Semelhago L, Hohnloser SH, et al. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS): results of a randomized controlled pilot study of left atrial appendage occlusion during coronary bypass surgery in patients at risk for stroke. Am Heart J. 2005. 150:288–293.
Article
18. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009. 374:534–542.
Article
19. Hwang JJ, Ko FN, Li YH, Ma HM, Wu GJ, Chang H, et al. Clinical implications and factors related to left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Cardiology. 1994. 85:69–75.
Article
20. Blackshear JL, Johnson WD, Odell JA, Baker VS, Howard M, Pearce L, et al. Thoracoscopic extracardiac obliteration of the left atrial appendage for stroke risk reduction in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003. 42:1249–1252.
Article
21. Block PC, Burstein S, Casale PN, Kramer PH, Teirstein P, Williams DO, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for patients in atrial fibrillation suboptimal for warfarin therapy: 5-year results of the PLAATO (Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion) Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. 2:594–600.
Article
22. Singh SM, Dukkipati SR, d'Avila A, Doshi SK, Reddy VY. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with an epicardial suture ligation approach: a prospective randomized pre-clinical feasibility study. Heart Rhythm. 2010. 7:370–376.
Article
23. Reddy VY, Holmes D, Doshi SK, Neuzil P, Kar S. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: results from the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with AF (PROTECT AF) clinical trial and the Continued Access Registry. Circulation. 2011. 123:417–424.
Article
24. Lip GY, Lim HS. Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention. Lancet Neurol. 2007. 6:981–993.
Article
25. Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJ, van Eickels M, Gaudin C, Page RL, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009. 360:668–678.
Article
26. Joung B, Chen PS, Lin SF. The role of the calcium and the voltage clocks in sinoatrial node dysfunction. Yonsei Med J. 2011. 52:211–219.
Article
27. Kim WH, Joung B, Shim J, Park JS, Hwang ES, Pak HN, et al. Long-term outcome of single-chamber atrial pacing compared with dual-chamber pacing in patients with sinus-node dysfunction and intact atrioventricular node conduction. Yonsei Med J. 2010. 51:832–837.
Article
28. ROCKET AF Study Investigators. Rivaroxaban-once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation: rationale and design of the ROCKET AF study. Am Heart J. 2010. 159:340–347.e1.
29. Park JW, Bethencourt A, Sievert H, Santoro G, Meier B, Walsh K, et al. Left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer cardiac plug in atrial fibrillation: initial European experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011. 77:700–706.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr