Ann Lab Med.  2012 Mar;32(2):153-157. 10.3343/alm.2012.32.2.153.

Novel Mutations in CEBPA in Korean Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia with a Normal Karyotype

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
  • 2Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Laboratory Medicine & Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. heejinkim@skku.edu

Abstract

Mutations in the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha gene (CEBPA) are found in 5-14% of the patients with AML and have been associated with a favorable clinical outcome. In this study, we aimed to assess the frequencies and characteristics of mutations in CEBPA. Between 2006 and 2009, CEBPA mutations were assessed using archival DNA samples obtained from 30 consecutive adult patients diagnosed with AML with a normal karyotype at our institution. CEBPA mutations were detected using direct sequencing analyses. These mutations were detected and described with reference to GenBank Accession No. NM_004364.3. In our series, CEBPA mutations were detected in 4 patients (13.3%). These mutations occurred as double mutations in all 4 patients. Among the 8 mutant alleles, 5 were novel (c.179_180dupCG, c.50_53delGCCA, c.178_182delACGTinsTTT, c.243_244insGTCG, and c.923_924insCTC). The frequency of occurrence of CEBPA mutations in Korean patients with AML is comparable to that in previous reports. Long-term follow-up data from a larger series of patients with comprehensive molecular profiling are needed to delineate the prognostic implications.

Keyword

CEBPA; Mutation; Acute myeloid leukemia; Normal Karyotype; Korea

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alleles
Asian Continental Ancestry Group/*genetics
CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-alpha/*genetics
Female
Humans
Karyotyping
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/*genetics
Male
Middle Aged
*Mutation
Republic of Korea
Sequence Analysis, DNA

Figure

  • Fig. 1 CEBPA mutations detected in 4 patients. CEBPA mutations occurred as double mutations in all 4 patients. CEBPA double mutations in these patients were c.179_180dupCG [N] and c.929_930insTCT [C], c.50_53delGCCA [N] and c.912_913insTTG [C], c.178_182delACGTinsTTT [N] and c.923_924insCTC [C], and c.243_244insGTCG [N] and c.912_913insTTG [C]. Among these mutations, c.179_180dupCG, c.50_53delGCCA, c.178_182delACGTinsTTT, c.243_244insGTCG, and c.923_924insCTC were novel mutations.


Reference

1. Byrd JC, Mrozek K, Dodge RK, Carroll AJ, Edwards CG, Arthur DC, et al. Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Blood. 2002. 100:4325–4336.
Article
2. Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, Wheatley K, Harrison C, Harrison G, et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood. 1998. 92:2322–2333.
3. Mrozek K, Heerema NA, Bloomfield CD. Cytogenetics in acute leukemia. Blood Rev. 2004. 18:115–136.
4. Estey E, Dohner H. Acute myeloid leukaemia. Lancet. 2006. 368:1894–1907.
Article
5. Lowenberg B, Griffin JD, Tallman MS. Acute myeloid leukemia and acute promyelocytic leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2003:82–101.
6. Schlenk RF, Dohner K, Krauter J, Frohling S, Corbacioglu A, Bullinger L, et al. Mutations and treatment outcome in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. New Engl J Med. 2008. 358:1909–1918.
Article
7. Scholl S, Fricke HJ, Sayer HG, Hoffken K. Clinical implications of molecular genetic aberrations in acute myeloid leukemia. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009. 135:491–505.
Article
8. Ley TJ, Ding L, Walter MJ, McLellan MD, Lamprecht T, Larson DE, et al. DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010. 363:2424–2433.
Article
9. Abbas S, Lugthart S, Kavelaars FG, Schelen A, Koenders JE, Zeilemaker A, et al. Acquired mutations in the genes encoding IDH1 and IDH2 both are recurrent aberrations in acute myeloid leukemia: prevalence and prognostic value. Blood. 2010. 116:2122–2126.
Article
10. Metzeler KH, Maharry K, Radmacher MD, Mrozek K, Margeson D, Becker H, et al. TET2 mutations improve the new European LeukemiaNet risk classification of acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol. 2011. 29:1373–1381.
Article
11. Pabst T, Mueller BU. Complexity of CEBPA dysregulation in human acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2009. 15:5303–5307.
12. Renneville A, Boissel N, Gachard N, Naguib D, Bastard C, de Botton S, et al. The favorable impact of CEBPA mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia is only observed in the absence of associated cytogenetic abnormalities and FLT3 internal duplication. Blood. 2009. 113:5090–5093.
Article
13. Wouters BJ, Lowenberg B, Erpelinck-Verschueren CA, van Putten WL, Valk PJ, Delwel R. Double CEBPA mutations, but not single CEBPA mutations, define a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia with a distinctive gene expression profile that is uniquely associated with a favorable outcome. Blood. 2009. 113:3088–3091.
Article
14. Dufour A, Schneider F, Metzeler KH, Hoster E, Schneider S, Zellmeier E, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia with biallelic CEBPA gene mutations and normal karyotype represents a distinct genetic entity associated with a favorable clinical outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2010. 28:570–577.
Article
15. Taskesen E, Bullinger L, Corbacioglu A, Sanders MA, Erpelinck CA, Wouters BJ, et al. Prognostic impact, concurrent genetic mutations, and gene expression features of AML with CEBPA mutations in a cohort of 1182 cytogenetically normal AML patients: further evidence for CEBPA double mutant AML as a distinctive disease entity. Blood. 2011. 117:2469–2475.
Article
16. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, editors. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. 2008. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
17. Pabst T, Eyholzer M, Fos J, Mueller BU. Heterogeneity within AML with CEBPA mutations; only CEBPA double mutations, but not single CEBPA mutations are associated with favourable prognosis. Br J Cancer. 2009. 100:1343–1346.
Article
18. Lin LI, Chen CY, Lin DT, Tsay W, Tang JL, Yeh YC, et al. Characterization of CEBPA mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: most patients with CEBPA mutations have biallelic mutations and show a distinct immunophenotype of the leukemic cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2005. 11:1372–1379.
Article
19. Fuchs O, Provaznikova D, Kocova M, Kostecka A, Cvekova P, Neuwirtova R, et al. CEBPA polymorphisms and mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2008. 40:401–405.
Article
20. Ishikawa Y, Kiyoi H, Tsujimura A, Miyawaki S, Miyazaki Y, Kuriyama K, et al. Comprehensive analysis of cooperative gene mutations between class I and class II in de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Eur J Haematol. 2009. 83:90–98.
21. Pabst T, Mueller BU, Zhang P, Radomska HS, Narravula S, Schnittger S, et al. Dominant-negative mutations of CEBPA, encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha (C/EBPalpha), in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet. 2001. 27:263–270.
22. Snaddon J, Smith ML, Neat M, Cambal-Parrales M, Dixon-McIver A, Arch R, et al. Mutations of CEBPA in acute myeloid leukemia FAB types M1 and M2. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003. 37:72–78.
23. Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani S, Erpelinck C, Meijer J, van Oosterhoud S, van Putten WL, Valk PJ, et al. Biallelic mutations in the CEBPA gene and low CEBPA expression levels as prognostic markers in intermediate-risk AML. Hematol J. 2003. 4:31–40.
Article
24. Gombart AF, Hofmann WK, Kawano S, Takeuchi S, Krug U, Kwok SH, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemias. Blood. 2002. 99:1332–1340.
25. Frohling S, Schlenk RF, Stolze I, Bihlmayr J, Benner A, Kreitmeier S, et al. CEBPA mutations in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: prognostic relevance and analysis of cooperating mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2004. 22:624–633.
26. Resende C, Regalo G, Duraes C, Carneiro F, Machado JC. Genetic changes of CEBPA in cancer: mutations or polymorphisms? J Clin Oncol. 2007. 25:2493–2494. author reply 4-5.
Article
27. Wouters BJ, Louwers I, Valk PJ, Lowenberg B, Delwel R. A recurrent inframe insertion in a CEBPA transactivation domain is a polymorphism rather than a mutation that does not affect gene expression profiling-based clustering of AML. Blood. 2007. 109:389–390.
Article
28. Szankasi P, Ho AK, Bahler DW, Efimova O, Kelley TW. Combined testing for CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (CEBPA) mutations and promoter methylation in acute myeloid leukemia demonstrates shared phenotypic features. Leuk Res. 2011. 35:200–207.
Article
29. Lin TC, Hou HA, Chou WC, Ou DL, Yu SL, Tien HF, et al. CEBPA methylation as a prognostic biomarker in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2011. 25:32–40.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ALM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr