J Vet Sci.  2009 Jun;10(2):93-98. 10.4142/jvs.2009.10.2.93.

Imaging evaluation of the liver using multi-detector row computed tomography in micropigs as potential living liver donors

• Ryu JM
• Kim DH
• Lee MY
• Lee SH
• Park JH
• Yun SP
• Jang MW
• Kim SH
• Rho GJ
• Han HJ

• KMID: 1102964
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2009.10.2.93

Abstract

The shortage of organ donors has stimulated interest in the possibility of using animal organs for transplantation into humans. In addition, pigs are now considered to be the most likely source animals for human xenotransplantation because of their advantages over non-human primates. However, the appropriate standard values for estimations of the liver of micropigs have not been established. The determination of standard values for the micropig liver using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) would help to select a suitable donor for an individual patient, determine the condition of the liver of the micropigs and help predict patient prognosis. Therefore, we determined the standard values for the livers of micropigs using MDCT. The liver parenchyma showed homogenous enhancement and had no space-occupying lesions. The total and right lobe volumes of the liver were 698.57 +/- 47.81 ml and 420.14 +/- 26.70 ml, which are 51.74% and 49.35% of the human liver volume, respectively. In micropigs, the percentage of liver volume to body weight was approximately 2.05%. The diameters of the common hepatic artery and proper hepatic artery were 6.24 +/- 0.20 mm and 4.68 +/- 0.13 mm, respectively. The hepatic vascular system of the micropigs was similar to that of humans, except for the variation in the length of the proper hepatic artery. In addition, the diameter of the portal vein was 11.27 +/- 0.38 mm. In conclusion, imaging evaluation using the MDCT was a reliable method for liver evaluation and its vascular anatomy for xenotransplantation using micropigs.

Keyword

liver evaluation; micropig; multi-detector row computed tomography; xenotransplantation

MeSH Terms

Animals
Female
Hepatic Artery/anatomy & histology
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods/*veterinary
Liver/*anatomy & histology/blood supply
Liver Transplantation/*methods
Living Donors
Male
Portal Vein/anatomy & histology
Swine
Swine, Miniature/*anatomy & histology
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods/*veterinary
Transplantation, Heterologous/*methods

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 (A) Contrast enhanced axial computed tomography (CT) images show relatively homogenous enhancement at the level of hepatic vein draining into the inferior vena cava of the micropig. Total volume of the liver parenchyma is calculated by serial CT scans in micropig No. 1. Representative figure on set the free-hand outlining of the perimeter of the liver (B) and histogram related on liver volume calculation (C).

• 

  Fig. 2 Representative axial computed tomography image shows the size of the common hepatic artery (A) and proper hepatic artery (B) during the arterial phase and the portal vein (C) during the portal phase. The arrow indicates the blood vessel being measured in each image.

• 

  Fig. 3 Three-dimensional volume rendered image of hepatic vascular system (A) and magnified image of the area demarcated by the white dotted rectangle (B). [Celiac axis (black arrow), splenic artery (white arrow), gastroduodenal artery (small white arrow), left gastric artery (small black arrow), common hepatic artery (black arrow head), proper hepatic artery (white arrow head)].

Reference

1. Balner H, van Leeuwen A, van Vreeswijk W, Dersjant H, van Rood JJ. Leukocytes antigens of chimpanzees and their relation to human HL-A antigens. Transplant Proc. 1970. 2:454–462.

2. Barnes AD, Hawker RJ. Leukocyte antigens in baboons: a preliminary to tissue typing for organ grafting. Transplant Proc. 1972. 4:37–42.

3. Behrns KE, Tsiotos GG, DeSouza NF, Krishna MK, Ludwig J, Nagorney DM. Hepatic steatosis as a potential risk factor for major hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 1998. 2:292–298.

4. Broelsch CE, Burdelski M, Rogiers X, Gundlach M, Knoefel WT, Langwieler T, Fischer L, Latta A, Hellwege H, Schulte FJ, Schmiegel W, Sterneck M, Greten H, Kuechler T, Krupski G, Loeliger C, Kuehnl P, Pothmann W, Esch JS. Living donor for liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1994. 20:49S–55S.

5. Broelsch CE, Malagó M, Testa G, Valentin Gamazo C. Living donor liver transplantation in adults: outcome in Europe. Liver Transpl. 2000. 6:S64–S65.

6. Chari RS, Collins BH, Magee JC, DiMaio JM, Kirk AD, Harland RC, McCann RL, Platt JL, Meyers WC. Brief report: treatment of hepatic failure with ex vivo pig-liver perfusion followed by liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1994. 331:234–237.

7. Chen YS, Chen CL, Liu PP, Chiang YC. Preoperative evaluation of donors for living related liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1996. 28:2415–2416.

8. Coşkun M, Kayahan EM, Ozbek O, Cakir B, Dalgiç A, Haberal M. Imaging of hepatic arterial anatomy for depicting vascular variations in living related liver transplant donor candidates with multidetector computed tomography: comparison with conventional angiography. Transplant Proc. 2005. 37:1070–1073.

9. Dahm F, Georgiev P, Clavien PA. Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications. Am J Transplant. 2005. 5:2605–2610.

10. Ezzelarab M, Cooper DK. Reducing Gal expression on the pig organ - a retrospective review. Xenotransplantation. 2005. 12:278–285.

11. Ferris JV, Marsh JW, Little AF. Presurgical evaluation of the liver transplant candidate. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995. 33:497–520.

12. Frericks BB, Caldarone FC, Nashan B, Savellano DH, Stamm G, Kirchhoff TD, Shin HO, Schenk A, Selle D, Spindler W, Klempnauer J, Peitgen HO, Galanski M. 3D CT modeling of hepatic vessel architecture and volume calculation in living donated liver transplantation. Eur Radiol. 2004. 14:326–333.

13. Fulcher AS, Szucs RA, Bassignani MJ, Marcos A. Right lobe living donor liver transplantation: preoperative evaluation of the donor with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001. 176:1483–1491.

14. Harland RC, Platt JL. Prospects for xenotransplantation of the liver. J Hepatol. 1996. 25:248–258.

15. Hiroshige S, Shimada M, Harada N, Shiotani S, Ninomiya M, Minagawa R, Soejima Y, Suehiro T, Honda H, Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Accurate preoperative estimation of liver-graft volumetry using three-dimensional computed tomography. Transplantation. 2003. 75:1561–1564.

16. Inomoto T, Nishizawa F, Sasaki H, Terajima H, Shirakata Y, Miyamoto S, Nagata I, Fujimoto M, Moriyasu F, Tanaka K, Yamaoka Y. Experiences of 120 microsurgical reconstructions of hepatic artery in living related liver transplantation. Surgery. 1996. 119:20–26.

17. Iwasaki M, Takada Y, Hayashi M, Minamiguchi S, Haga H, Maetani Y, Fujii K, Kiuchi T, Tanaka K. Noninvasive evaluation of graft steatosis in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2004. 78:1501–1505.

18. Kamel IR, Kruskal JB, Warmbrand G, Goldberg SN, Pomfret EA, Raptopoulos V. Accuracy of volumetric measurements after virtual right hepatectomy in potential donors undergoing living adult liver transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001. 176:483–487.

19. Kawasaki S, Makuuchi M, Matsunami H, Hashikura Y, Ikegami T, Chisuwa H, Ikeno T, Noike T, Takayama T, Kawarazaki H. Preoperative measurement of segmental liver volume of donors for living related liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1993. 18:1115–1120.

20. Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K, Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Asonuma K, Egawa H, Fujita S, Hayashi M, Tanaka K. Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. Transplantation. 1999. 67:321–327.

21. Lai L, Kolber-Simonds D, Park KW, Cheong HT, Greenstein JL, Im GS, Samuel M, Bonk A, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Hawley RJ, Prather RS. Production of α-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning. Science. 2002. 295:1089–1092.

22. Lee MW, Lee JM, Lee JY, Kim SH, Park EA, Han JK, Kim YJ, Shin KS, Suh KS, Choi BI. Preoperative evaluation of the hepatic vascular anatomy in living liver donors: comparison of CT angiography and MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006. 24:1081–1087.

23. Lee SS, Kim TK, Byun JH, Ha HK, Kim PN, Kim AY, Lee SG, Lee MG. Hepatic arteries in potential donors for living related liver transplantation: evaluation with multidetector row CT angiography. Radiology. 2003. 227:391–399.

24. Lee VS, Morgan GR, Teperman LW, John D, Diflo T, Pandharipande PV, Berman PM, Lavelle MT, Krinsky GA, Rofsky NM, Schlossberg P, Weinreb JC. MR imaging as the sole preoperative imaging modality for right hepatectomy: a prospective study of living adult-to-adult liver donor candidates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001. 176:1475–1482.

25. Low G, Wiebe E, Walji AH, Bigam DL. Imaging evaluation of potential donors in living-donor liver transplantation. Clin Radiol. 2008. 63:136–145.

26. Magee JC, Krishnan SM, Benfield MR, Hsu DT, Shneider BL. Pediatric transplantation in the United States, 1997-2006. Am J Transplant. 2008. 8:935–945.

27. Metzgar RS, Seigler HF. Tissue antigens of man and chimpanzees; their role in xenografting. Transplant Proc. 1970. 2:463–467.

28. Platt JL. Physiologic barriers to xenotransplantation. Transplant Proc. 2000. 32:1547–1548.

29. Ramsoondar JJ, Machaty Z, Costa C, Williams BL, Fodor WL, Bondioli KR. Production of α 1, 3-galactosy ltransferase-knockout cloned pigs expressing human α 1,2-fucosylosyltransferase. Biol Reprod. 2003. 69:437–445.

30. Raptopoulos V, Karellas A, Bernstein J, Reale FR, Constantinou C, Zawacki JK. Value of dual-energy CT in differentiating focal fatty infiltration of the liver from low-density masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991. 157:721–725.

31. Ryan CK, Johnson LA, Germin BI, Marcos A. One hundred consecutive hepatic biopsies in the workup of living donors for right lobe liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2002. 8:1114–1122.

32. Satou S, Sugawara Y, Tamura S, Kishi Y, Kaneko J, Matsui Y, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M. Three-dimensional computed tomography for planning donor hepatectomy. Transplant Proc. 2007. 39:145–149.

33. Schroeder T, Malagó M, Debatin JF, Goyen M, Nadalin S, Ruehm SG. "All-in-one" imaging protocols for the evaluation of potential living liver donors: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography. Liver Transpl. 2005. 11:776–787.

34. Schroeder T, Nadalin S, Stattaus J, Debatin JF, Malago M, Ruehm SG. Potential living liver donors: evaluation with an all-in-one protocol with multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2002. 224:586–591.

35. Soejima Y, Shimada M, Suehiro T, Hiroshige S, Ninomiya M, Shiotani S, Harada N, Hideki I, Yonemura Y, Maehara Y. Outcome analysis in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using the left lobe. Liver Transpl. 2003. 9:581–586.

36. Trotter JF. Selection of donors and recipients for living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2000. 6:S52–S58.

37. Wang XF, Li B, Lan X, Yuan D, Zhang M, Wei YG, Zeng Y, Wen TF, Zhao JC, Yan LN. Establishment of formula predicting adult standard liver volume for liver transplantation. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008. 46:1129–1132.

38. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KH. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature. 1997. 385:810–813.

39. Yuan D, Lu T, Wei YG, Li B, Yan LN, Zeng Y, Wen TF, Zhao JC. Estimation of standard liver volume for liver transplantation in the Chinese population. Transplant Proc. 2008. 40:3536–3540.

40. Zhou XP, Lu T, Wei YG, Chen XZ. Liver volume variation in patients with virus-induced cirrhosis: findings on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007. 189:W153–W159.