Clin Orthop Surg.  2011 Mar;3(1):16-23. 10.4055/cios.2011.3.1.16.

Subsidence and Nonunion after Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Using a Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cage

• Yang JJ
• Yu CH
• Chang BS
• Yeom JS
• Lee JH
• Lee CK

• KMID: 999456
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2011.3.1.16

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The purposes of the present study are to evaluate the subsidence and nonunion that occurred after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a stand-alone intervertebral cage and to analyze the risk factors for the complications.
METHODS
Thirty-eight patients (47 segments) who underwent anterior cervical fusion using a stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage and an autologous cancellous iliac bone graft from June 2003 to August 2008 were enrolled in this study. The anterior and posterior segmental heights and the distance from the anterior edge of the upper vertebra to the anterior margin of the cage were measured on the plain radiographs. Subsidence was defined as > or = a 2 mm (minor) or 3 mm (major) decrease of the segmental height at the final follow-up compared to that measured at the immediate postoperative period. Nonunion was evaluated according to the instability being > or = 2 mm in the interspinous distance on the flexion-extension lateral radiographs.
RESULTS
The anterior and posterior segmental heights decreased from the immediate postoperative period to the final follow-up at 1.33 +/- 1.46 mm and 0.81 +/- 1.27 mm, respectively. Subsidence > or = 2 mm and 3 mm were observed in 12 segments (25.5%) and 7 segments (14.9%), respectively. Among the expected risk factors for subsidence, a smaller anteroposterior (AP) diameter (14 mm vs. 12 mm) of cages (p = 0.034; odds ratio [OR], 0.017) and larger intraoperative distraction (p = 0.041; OR, 3.988) had a significantly higher risk of subsidence. Intervertebral nonunion was observed in 7 segments (7/47, 14.9%). Compared with the union group, the nonunion group had a significantly higher ratio of two-level fusion to one-level fusions (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Anterior cervical fusion using a stand-alone cage with a large AP diameter while preventing anterior intraoperative over-distraction will be helpful to prevent the subsidence of cages. Two-level cervical fusion might require more careful attention for avoiding nonunion.

Keyword

Anterior cervical fusion; PEEK cage; Subsidence; Nonunion

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Biocompatible Materials
Cervical Vertebrae/pathology/radiography/*surgery
Diskectomy
Female
Humans
*Internal Fixators
Intervertebral Disk Degeneration/*surgery
Ketones
Male
Middle Aged
*Postoperative Complications
Prosthesis Failure
Radiculopathy/surgery
Regression Analysis
Risk Factors
Spinal Cord Diseases/surgery
Spinal Fusion/*methods
Treatment Outcome

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 (A) The anterior segmental height (ASH) and posterior segmental height (PSH) were measured as the distance between the upper end plate of the upper vertebra and the lower end plate of the lower vertebra at the anterior and posterior margins, respectively. (B) The cage distance was measured as the distance between the anterior edge of the upper vertebra and the anterior margin of the cage. (C) Magnification differences were corrected by the ratio between the anteroposterior diameters at the middle of the upper vertebral body on each plain radiograph (A-a) and MRI (B-b). Every length measured on the plain radiographs was multiplied by the ratio (B-b/A-a). (D) Segmental lordosis was measured using Cobb's method.

• 

  Fig. 2 A case of anterior subsidence without nonunion. The anterior subsidence was 2.8 mm, and segmental stability on the flexion and extension radiographs was observed. Subsidence is not necessarily accompanied with nonunion. F/U: follow-up.

• 

  Fig. 3 A case of nonsubsidence with nonunion. Instability with a difference of 5 mm between the interspinous distances on the flexion and extension radiographs was observed without subsidence. Nonunion can occur without subsidence. F/U: follow-up.

Reference

1. Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg. 1958. 15(6):602–617.

2. Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958. 40(3):607–624.

3. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS. Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity: a statistical evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995. 20(9):1055–1060.

4. Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD, et al. Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. 28(2):134–139.

5. Siddiqui AA, Jackowski A. Cage versus tricortical graft for cervical interbody fusion: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003. 85(7):1019–1025.

6. Vavruch L, Hedlund R, Javid D, Leszniewski W, Shalabi A. A prospective randomized comparison between the cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine: a clinical and radiologic study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002. 27(16):1694–1701.

7. Kast E, Derakhshani S, Bothmann M, Oberle J. Subsidence after anterior cervical inter-body fusion: a randomized prospective clinical trial. Neurosurg Rev. 2009. 32(2):207–214.

8. Kulkarni AG, Hee HT, Wong HK. Solis cage (PEEK) for anterior cervical fusion: preliminary radiological results with emphasis on fusion and subsidence. Spine J. 2007. 7(2):205–209.

9. Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Schafer J, et al. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001. 26(17):1850–1857.

10. Bartels RH, Donk RD, Feuth T. Subsidence of stand-alone cervical carbon fiber cages. Neurosurgery. 2006. 58(3):502–508.

11. Gercek E, Arlet V, Delisle J, Marchesi D. Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning. Eur Spine J. 2003. 12(5):513–516.

12. Schmieder K, Wolzik-Grossmann M, Pechlivanis I, Engelhardt M, Scholz M, Harders A. Subsidence of the wing titanium cage after anterior cervical interbody fusion: 2-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006. 4(6):447–453.

13. van Jonbergen HP, Spruit M, Anderson PG, Pavlov PW. Anterior cervical interbody fusion with a titanium box cage: early radiological assessment of fusion and subsidence. Spine J. 2005. 5(6):645–649.

14. Bartels RH, Donk R, van Azn RD. Height of cervical foramina after anterior discectomy and implantation of a carbon fiber cage. J Neurosurg. 2001. 95:1 Suppl. 40–42.

15. Ha SK, Park JY, Kim SH, Lim DJ, Kim SD, Lee SK. Radiologic assessment of subsidence in stand-alone cervical polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008. 44(6):370–374.

16. Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Saruhashi Y, Mori K. Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J. 2001. 10(4):320–324.

17. Oda I, Cunningham BW, Buckley RA, et al. Does spinal kyphotic deformity influence the biomechanical characteristics of the adjacent motion segments? An in vivo animal model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999. 24(20):2139–2146.

18. Shad A, Leach JC, Teddy PJ, Cadoux-Hudson TA. Use of the Solis cage and local autologous bone graft for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: early technical experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005. 2(2):116–122.

19. Paramore CG, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK. Radiographic and clinical follow-up review of Caspar plates in 49 patients. J Neurosurg. 1996. 84(6):957–961.

20. Bose B. Anterior cervical fusion using Caspar plating: analysis of results and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 1998. 49(1):25–31.

21. Gaudinez RF, English GM, Gebhard JS, Brugman JL, Donaldson DH, Brown CW. Esophageal perforations after anterior cervical surgery. J Spinal Disord. 2000. 13(1):77–84.

22. Steffen T, Tsantrizos A, Fruth I, Aebi M. Cages: designs and concepts. Eur Spine J. 2000. 9:Suppl 1. S89–S94.

23. Barsa P, Suchomel P. Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion. Eur Spine J. 2007. 16(9):1395–1400.

24. Lee SH, Suk KS, Kim KT, Lee JH, Seo EM, Im YS. Outcome analysis of single level anterior cervical fusion using interbody PEEK cage with autologous iliac bone graft. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2009. 44(1):93–101.

25. Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim HB 3rd, Turner AS. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials. 2006. 27(3):324–334.

26. Wenz LM, Merritt K, Brown SA, Moet A, Steffee AD. In vitro biocompatibility of polyetheretherketone and polysulfone composites. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990. 24(2):207–215.

27. Cannada LK, Scherping SC, Yoo JU, Jones PK, Emery SE. Pseudoarthrosis of the cervical spine: a comparison of radiographic diagnostic measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. 28(1):46–51.