Yonsei Med J.  2008 Jun;49(3):429-435. 10.3349/ymj.2008.49.3.429.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels in Ascites Between Chemonaive and Chemotreated Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. chs@catholic.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in malignant ascites have high diagnostic value for their discrimination from asictes of non-malignant origin. However, there have been no reports on the comparison of VEGF levels between malignant ascites of chemonaive and chemotreated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VEGF levels were measured in 44 ascites patients (cirrhosis ascites, 10; chemonaive patients, 21; chemotreated patients, 13) and compared to the level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9). The diagnostic parameters of sensitivity, specificity, and correlation among 3 markers were evaluated. RESULTS: VEGF levels in malignant ascites of chemonaive and chemotreated patients were significantly higher than those in cirrhotic ascites (p<0.05). VEGF levels in ascites of chemonaive patients were significantly higher than those in chemotreated patients (p<0.05). A cutoff value of 10.4pg/mL was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) for VEGF in chemotreated and chemonaive patients, which gave sensitivities of 75.0% and 53.8% and specificities of 69.6% and 47.1%, respectively. Positive correlations were observed between VEGF and CEA (r=0.353, p<0.05) as well as between VEGF and CA19-9 (r=0.367, p<0.05) in ascites. CONCLUSION: VEGF levels could be a useful tumor marker for malignant ascites, but its value should carefully be interpreted because of lesser reliability in chemotreated ones.

Keyword

Vascular endothelial growth factor; chemotherapy; malignant ascites; carbohydrate antigen 19-9; carcinoembryonic antigen

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ascites/*drug therapy/*metabolism/pathology
CA-19-9 Antigen/metabolism
Carcinoembryonic Antigen/metabolism
Child
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Treatment Outcome
Tumor Markers, Biological/metabolism
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/*metabolism

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Malignant ascites of chemonaive patients. The areas under the ROC curve were 0.766 (p = 0.002). (B) Malignant ascites of chemotreated patients. The areas under the ROC curve were 0.462 (p = 0.686). ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

  • Fig. 2 (A) Correlation between ascitic VEGF concentrations and CA19 - 9 concentrations in malignant ascites. (B) Correlation between ascitic VEGF concentrations and CEA concentrations in malignant ascites. VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.


Reference

1. Aslam N, Marino CR. Malignant ascites: new concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Arch Intern Med. 2001. 161:2733–2737.
2. Colli A, Buccino G, Cocciolo M, Parravicini R, Mariani F, Scaltrini G. Diagnostic accuracy of fibronectin in the differential diagnosis of ascites. Cancer. 1986. 58:2489–2493.
Article
3. Sevinc A, Sari R, Fadillioglu E. The utility of lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme pattern in the diagnostic evaluation of malignant and nonmalignant ascites. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005. 97:79–84.
4. Yildirim B, Sari R, Isci N. Patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and mlignant and cirrhotic ascites. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005. 97:276–280.
5. Siddiqui RA, Kochhar R, Singh V, Rajwanshi A, Goenka MK, Metha SK. Evaluation of fibronectin as a marker of malignant ascites. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1992. 7:161–164.
Article
6. Rana SV, Babu SG, Kocchar R. Usefulness of ascitic fluid cholesterol as a marker for malignant ascites. Med Sci Monit. 2005. 11:CR136–CR142.
7. Zebrowski BK, Liu W, Ramirez K, Akagi Y, Mills GB, Ellis LM. Markedly elevated levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in malignant ascites. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999. 6:373–378.
Article
8. Dong WG, Sun XM, Yu BP, Luo HS, Yu JP. Role of VEGF and CD44v6 in differentiating benign from malignant ascites. World J Gastroenterol. 2003. 9:2596–2600.
Article
9. Abramov Y, Anteby SO, Fasouliotis SJ, Barak V. Markedly elevated levels of vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and interleukin 6 in Meigs syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001. 184:354–355.
Article
10. Sun XM, Dong WG, Yu BP, Luo HS, Yu JP. Clinical significance of detecting VEGF, CD44v6, MMP-2 and MMP-9 in malignant ascites. Ai Zheng. 2004. 23:85–89.
11. Nascimento I, Schaer R, Lemaire D, Freire S, Paule B, Carvalho S, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels as a tool to discriminate between malignant and nonmalignant ascites. APMIS. 2004. 112:585–587.
Article
12. Kraft A, Weindel K, Ochs A, Marth C, Zmija J, Schumacher P, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in the sera and effusions of patients with malignant and nonmalignant disease. Cancer. 1999. 85:178–187.
Article
13. Kuwahara K, Sasaki T, Kobayashi K, Noma B, Serikawa M, Iiboshi T, et al. Gemcitabine suppresses malignant ascites of human pancreatic cancer: correlation with VEGF expression in ascites. Oncol Rep. 2004. 11:73–80.
Article
14. Manenti L, Riccardi E, Marchini S, Naumova E, Floriani I, Garofalo A, et al. Circulating plasma vascular endothelial growth factor in mice bearing human ovarian carcinoma xenograft correlates with tumor progression and response to therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005. 4:715–725.
Article
15. Keyes K, Cox K, Treadway P, Mann L, Shih C, Faul MM, et al. An in vitro tumor model: analysis of angiogenic factor expression after chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2002. 62:5597–5602.
16. Lissoni P, Fugamalli E, Malugani F, Ardizzoia A, Secondino S, Tancini G, et al. Chemotherapy and angiogenesis in advanced cancer: vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) decline as predictor of disease control during taxol therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2000. 15:308–311.
Article
17. Fernandes LC, Kim SB, Saad SS, Matos D. Value of carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratins for the detection of recurrent disease following curative resection of colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006. 12:3891–3894.
Article
18. Lowe D, Lee J, Schade R, Chaudhary A. Patient with markedly elevated CA 19-9 not associated with malignancy. South Med J. 2006. 99:306–308.
Article
19. Nowak J, Jakubowska D, Wiczkowski A, Sprzaczkowska K, Stechly T, Zmudzińs W, et al. Carbohydrate antigens CA 19-9, CA 242, CA 50 in liver diseases. Wiad Lek. 1998. 51:484–491.
20. Trapé J, Molina R, Sant F. Clinical evaluation of the simultaneous determination of tumor markers in fluid and serum and their ratio in the differential diagnosis of serous effusions. Tumour Biol. 2004. 25:276–281.
Article
21. Chen SJ, Wang SS, Lu CW, Chao Y, Lee FY, Lee SD, et al. Clinical value of tumour markers and serum-ascites albumin gradient in the diagnosis of malignancy-related ascites. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1994. 9:396–400.
Article
22. Cascinu S, Del Ferro E, Barbanti I, Ligi M, Fedeli A, Catalano G. Tumor markers in the diagnosis of malignant serous effusions. Am J Clin Oncol. 1997. 20:247–250.
Article
23. Miles LE, Hales CM. Labelled antibodies and immunological assay systems. Nature. 1968. 219:186–189.
Article
24. Denstman F, Rosen L, Khubchandani IT, Sheets JA, Stasik JJ, Reither RD. Comparing predictive decision rules in postoperative CEA monitoring. Cancer. 1986. 58:2089–2095.
Article
25. Del Villano BC, Brennan S, Brock P, Bucher C, Liu V, McClure M, et al. Radioimmunometric assay for a monoclonal antibody-defined tumor marker, CA 19-9. Clin Chem. 1983. 29:549–552.
Article
26. Light RW, Macgregor MI, Luchsinger PC, Ball WC Jr. Pleural effusions: the diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates. Ann Intern Med. 1972. 77:507–513.
Article
27. WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment. 1979. Geneva: World Health Organization;WHO Offset Publication No. 48.
28. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer. 1981. 47:207–214.
Article
29. Hyodo I, Doi T, Endo H, Hosokawa Y, Nishikawa Y, Tanimizu M, et al. Clinical significance of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor in gastrointestinal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1998. 34:2041–2045.
Article
30. Loewenstein MS, Rittgers RA, Feinerman AE, Kupchik HZ, Marcel BR, Koff RS, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen assay of ascites and detection of malignancy. Ann Intern Med. 1978. 88:635–638.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr