Korean J Orthod.  2025 May;55(3):234-241. 10.4041/kjod24.213.

Prevalence and characteristics of impacted teeth in Korean orthodontic patients at ten university dental hospitals

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Institute, and Dental and Life Science Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea
  • 2Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Korea
  • 3Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
  • 4Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea
  • 6Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea
  • 7Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Korea
  • 8Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea
  • 9Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea
  • 10Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea

Abstract


Objective
This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of impacted teeth (ITs) in orthodontic patients at university dental hospitals in Korea.
Methods
This study included 14,774 patients who visited the Department of Orthodontics at 10 university dental hospitals in Korea between 2020 and 2022 and underwent orthodontic diagnosis. The prevalence and characteristics of ITs were investigated using orthodontic diagnostic records, radiographs, and diagnostic casts.
Results
The prevalence of ITs, excluding third molar impaction, in Korean orthodontic patients was 13.6% (n = 2,014). The prevalence of ITs in pediatric orthodontic patients was 24.5% (n = 1,614). Of these patients, 68.2% had one IT, 27.5% had two ITs, 24.3% had bilateral IT, and 75.7% had unilateral IT. The most frequent IT was the maxillary canine (50.1%), followed by the mandibular second molar (11.7%), and maxillary second premolar (9.6%). An abnormal eruption path (46.5%) was the most frequent etiology. Orthodontic traction after surgical exposure (70.6%) was the most frequent treatment option. Among the patients with ITs, 29.8% had other dental anomalies, such as tooth agenesis (8.7%), microdontia (8.0%), and supernumerary teeth (5.1%). Furthermore, 50.8% had complications such as cystic lesions (18.3%), transposition (17.7%), and root resorption (14.8%). Among the patients with maxillary canine impaction, 62.2% had labial maxillary canine impaction and 21.1% had palatal maxillary canine impaction.
Conclusions
The prevalence of ITs in Korean orthodontic patients at university dental hospitals was high, particularly in pediatric orthodontic patients.

Keyword

Prevalence; Impacted tooth; Orthodontic patient; University dental hospital

Figure

  • Figure 1 Bar graphs of impacted teeth prevalence. U, maxilla; L, mandible; 1, central incisor; 2, lateral incisor; 3, canine; 4, first premolar; 5, second premolar; 6, first molar; 7, second molar.

  • Figure 2 Etiologies of impacted teeth.

  • Figure 3 Treatment methods for impacted teeth.

  • Figure 4 Skeletal anteroposterior malocclusion of patients with impacted teeth.

  • Figure 5 Other dental anomalies of patients with impacted teeth.

  • Figure 6 Number of impacted teeth per patient.


Reference

1. Baron C, Houchmand-Cuny M, Enkel B, Lopez-Cazaux S. 2018; Prevalence of dental anomalies in French orthodontic patients: a retrospective study. Arch Pediatr. 25:426–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2018.07.002. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2018.07.002. PMID: 30249487.
Article
2. Orban BJ. 1944. Oral histology and embryology. Mosby;St. Louis: https://search.worldcat.org/ko/title/14733387. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-194405000-00030.
3. Ku JH, Han B, Kim J, Oh J, Kook YA, Kim Y. 2022; Common dental anomalies in Korean orthodontic patients: an update. Korean J Orthod. 52:324–33. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod21.280. DOI: 10.4041/kjod21.280. PMID: 35844099. PMCID: PMC9512625.
Article
4. Kokich VG, Mathews DP. 1993; Surgical and orthodontic management of impacted teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 37:181–204. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8477864/. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00276-2. PMID: 8477864.
Article
5. Thilander B, Jakobsson SO. 1968; Local factors in impaction of maxillary canines. Acta Odontol Scand. 26:145–68. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356809004587. DOI: 10.3109/00016356809004587. PMID: 5247251.
Article
6. Becker A. 2002; Early treatment for impacted maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 121:586–7. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.124171. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.124171. PMID: 12080308.
Article
7. Oh S, Kim YI, Kim SS, Park SB, Kim SH. 2023; Comparison of root apex's position between unilateral and bilateral palatally impacted canines: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 163:311–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.11.017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.11.017. PMID: 36404174.
Article
8. Bedoya MM, Park JH. 2009; A review of the diagnosis and management of impacted maxillary canines. J Am Dent Assoc. 140:1485–93. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0099. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0099. PMID: 19955066.
Article
9. Moorrees CF, Fanning EA, Hunt EE Jr. 1963; Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 42:1490–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345630420062701. DOI: 10.1177/00220345630420062701. PMID: 14081973.
Article
10. Stewart JA, Heo G, Glover KE, Williamson PC, Lam EW, Major PW. 2001; Factors that relate to treatment duration for patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 119:216–25. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.110989. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.110989. PMID: 11244415.
Article
11. Laganà G, Venza N, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Fabi F, Danesi C, Cozza P. 2017; Dental anomalies: prevalence and associations between them in a large sample of non-orthodontic subjects, a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 17:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0352-y. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0352-y. PMID: 28284207. PMCID: PMC5346249.
Article
12. Lee JH, Yang BH, Lee SM, Kim YH, Shim HW, Chung HS. 2011; A study on the prevalence of dental anomalies in Korean dental-patients. Korean J Orthod. 41:346–53. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2011.41.5.346. DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2011.41.5.346.
Article
13. Guglielmi F, Alessandri-Bonetti A, Gemelli G, Sangalli L, Gallenzi P. 2024; Prevalence of malocclusions and parafunctional habits in pediatric patients with developmental dyslexia. Korean J Orthod. 54:229–38. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod23.256. DOI: 10.4041/kjod23.256. PMID: 39048920. PMCID: PMC11270149.
Article
14. Son WS, Oh S, Kim YI, Kim SS, Park SB, Kim SH. 2020; Comparison of maxillary basal arch forms using the root apex in adult women with different skeletal patterns: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 158:572–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.09.021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.09.021. PMID: 32828610.
Article
15. Kim SH, Kim YM, Oh S, Kim SS, Park SB, Son WS, et al. 2017; How far is the root apex of a unilateral impacted canine from the root apices' arch form? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 151:351–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.047. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.047. PMID: 28153165.
Article
16. Uslu O, Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Cebeci I. 2009; Prevalence of dental anomalies in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 135:328–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.030. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.030. PMID: 19268831.
Article
17. Haddad Z, Khorasani M, Bakhshi M, Tofangchiha M, Shalli Z. 2021; Radiographic position of impacted mandibular third molars and their association with pathological conditions. Int J Dent. 2021:8841297. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8841297. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8841297. PMID: 33833805. PMCID: PMC8012125. PMID: e6451e7996c3410e9e41312ff0a0d297.
Article
18. Kim Y, Hyun HK, Jang KT. 2012; The position of maxillary canine impactions and the influenced factors to adjacent root resorption in the Korean population. Eur J Orthod. 34:302–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr002. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr002. PMID: 21303809.
Article
19. Jo W, Lee N, Lee S. 2014; A statistical study on characteristics and treatment of child and adolescent patients with tooth impaction. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 41:306–13. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2014.41.4.306. DOI: 10.5933/JKAPD.2014.41.4.306.
Article
20. Ducommun F, Bornstein MM, Bosshardt D, Katsaros C, Dula K. 2018; Diagnosis of tooth ankylosis using panoramic views, cone beam computed tomography, and histological data: a retrospective observational case series study. Eur J Orthod. 40:231–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx063. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjx063. PMID: 29016762.
Article
21. Wang Y, Chen X, Zhou D, Zheng L, Li X, Peng Y. 2024; Appropriate timing of treatment contributes to better root development of impacted anterior teeth in children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 165:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.06.022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.06.022. PMID: 37656074.
Article
22. Fardi A, Kondylidou-Sidira A, Bachour Z, Parisis N, Tsirlis A. 2011; Incidence of impacted and supernumerary teeth-a radiographic study in a North Greek population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 16:e56–61. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e56. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.16.e56. PMID: 20711166.
Article
23. Patil S, Maheshwari S. 2014; Prevalence of impacted and supernumerary teeth in the North Indian population. J Clin Exp Dent. 6:e116–20. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51284. DOI: 10.4317/jced.51284. PMID: 24790709. PMCID: PMC4002339.
Article
24. Bishara SE. 1992; Impacted maxillary canines: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 101:159–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70008-x. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70008-X. PMID: 1739070.
Article
25. Dewel BF. 1949; The upper cuspid: its development and impaction. Angle Orthod. 19:79–90. https://meridian.allenpress.com/angle-orthodontist/article/19/2/79/55028/The-Upper-Cuspid-Its-Development-and-Impaction.
26. Kim YH, Kim SH, Baek SH. 2010; Consideration of clinically related dental anomalies: prevalence and association. J Korean Dent Sci. 3:17–24. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE02117844.
27. Bishara SE. 1998; Clinical management of impacted maxillary canines. Semin Orthod. 4:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1073-8746(98)80006-6. DOI: 10.1016/S1073-8746(98)80006-6. PMID: 9680907.
Article
28. Al-Zoubi H, Alharbi AA, Ferguson DJ, Zafar MS. 2017; Frequency of impacted teeth and categorization of impacted canines: a retrospective radiographic study using orthopantomograms. Eur J Dent. 11:117–21. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_308_16. DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_308_16. PMID: 28435377. PMCID: PMC5379823.
Article
29. Cobourne MT, Sharpe PT. 2003; Tooth and jaw: molecular mechanisms of patterning in the first branchial arch. Arch Oral Biol. 48:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9969(02)00208-x. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9969(02)00208-X. PMID: 12615136.
Article
30. Lee SJ, Kim TW, Suhr CH. 1994; Study of recognition of malocclusion and orthodontic treatments. Korean J Orthod. 24:193–8. https://e-kjo.org/journal/view.html?volume=24&number=1&spage=193.
31. Jung MH. 2012; Age, extraction rate and jaw surgery rate in Korean orthodontic clinics and small dental hospitals. Korean J Orthod. 42:80–6. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.2.80. DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.2.80. PMID: 23112936. PMCID: PMC3481968.
Article
32. Yu HS, Ryu YK, Lee JY. 1999; A study on the distributions and trends in malocclusion patients from department of orthodontics, college of dentistry, Yonsei university. Korean J Orthod. 29:267–76. https://e-kjo.org/journal/view.html?volume=29&number=2&spage=267.
Full Text Links
  • KJOD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr