J Korean Med Sci.  2025 Apr;40(13):e47. 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e47.

Woman Doctor Leadership on the Editorial Board of the Korean Medical Journals

• Ko E
• Jeon H
• Kim YH
• Lim CH

• KMID: 2566823
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e47

Abstract

Background
The proportion of women doctors has been rising globally and South Korea mirrors this trend. Despite this growth, women doctors’ representation in leadership roles in academic medical fields remains scarce. This study investigates the representation and trends of women doctors’ leadership in editorial boards of South Korean medical journals, and compares the gender ratio of specialists.
Methods
This non-clinical data analysis examined the editorial boards of 45 major medical academic journals published in 2015, 2020, and 2024 to investigate women leadership within journal editorial boards, compares the gender ratio of specialists, and observed changes over time.
Results
The study included data from 1,475 members in 2015, 1,598 in 2020, and 2,531 in 2024. In 2020, 23.8% of specialists were women, but only 19.5% of editorial board members were women (P < 0.001). Nine journals had less than 10% women representation on their editorial boards. Over nine years, women representation on editorial boards increased from 16.8% in 2015 to 21.3% in 2024 (P = 0.001), with significant increases in societies of clinical medicine (14.6% vs. 20.0%; P < 0.001) but not in basic medicine. Journals with women editors-in-chief had significantly higher women representation on their boards compared to ones with male editorsin-chief (36.7 ± 13.5% vs. 18.4 ± 10.9%, P < 0.001). The proportion of women senior editorial roles and that of women executive society members showed a significant positive correlation with the proportion of women on editorial boards (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion
The study highlights the considerable underrepresentation of women in editorial leadership compared to their presence as specialists. However, the number of women editorial board members has increased over the past decade, especially in clinical medicine. Women doctors’ leadership positively correlates with higher women participation on boards, which suggests that promoting women leaders could enhance gender diversity in academic medicine. Further qualitative research is needed to explore the impact of women doctors’ leadership on medical research and patient outcomes. This study provides critical insights into gender disparities in South Korean medical academia and underscores the need for policies to promote women doctors’ leadership.

Keyword

Female; Gender Equity; Leadership; Workforce Diversity; Editor; Editorial Board; Korea

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Flow chart of included population.

• 

  Fig. 2 Proportion of women editorial board members between 2015 and 2024. Three figures show the proportion of women of (A) overall, (B) clinical medicine, and (C) basic medicine.

Reference

1. OECD. Health at a Glance 2021. Paris, France: OECD;2021.

2. OECD. Health at a Glance 2023. Paris, France: OECD;2023.

3. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Health and Welfare Statistical Yearbook, 2018-2022. Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2022.

4. Waldhorn I, Bomze D, Ben-Aharon I, Schlosser S, Markel G, Ludmir EB, et al. Gender fap in leadership of clinical trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2023; 183(12):1406–1408. PMID: 37902723.

5. Starchl C, Shah V, Zollner-Schwetz I, Knezevic J, Geiger S, Amrein K. A comparison of the representation of women in editor positions at major medical journals in 2021 vs 2011. Acad Med. 2023; 98(1):75–79. PMID: 36576769.

6. Hastie MJ, Lee A, Siddiqui S, Oakes D, Wong CA. Misconceptions about women in leadership in academic medicine. Can J Anaesth. 2023; 70(6):1019–1025. PMID: 37193865.

7. Pinho-Gomes AC, Vassallo A, Thompson K, Womersley K, Norton R, Woodward M. Representation of women among editors in chief of leading medical journals. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(9):e2123026. PMID: 34495341.

8. McMullen K, Kraus MB, Kosiorek H, Harbell MW. Representation of women as editors in anesthesiology journals. Anesth Analg. 2022; 134(5):956–963. PMID: 35073283.

9. Gomez LE, Bernet P. Diversity improves performance and outcomes. J Natl Med Assoc. 2019; 111(4):383–392. PMID: 30765101.

10. McKinsey & Company. Women in the Workplace 2021. New York, NY, USA: McKinsey & Company, LeanIn.org;2021.

11. Joshi MP, Diekman AB. My fair lady? Inferring organizational trust from the mere presence of women in leadership roles. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022; 48(8):1220–1237. PMID: 34350799.

12. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Number of Certified Specialists by Gender, Specialty, and Type of Institution. Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2020.

13. Jagsi R, Tarbell NJ, Henault LE, Chang Y, Hylek EM. The representation of women on the editorial boards of major medical journals: a 35-year perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168(5):544–548. PMID: 18332302.

14. The Editors Of The Lancet Group. The Lancet Group’s commitments to gender equity and diversity. Lancet. 2019; 394(10197):452–453. PMID: 31402014.

15. Kibbe MR, Freischlag J. Call to action to all surgery journal editors for diversity in the editorial and peer review process. JAMA Surg. 2020; 155(11):1015–1016. PMID: 32865554.

16. Cho S, Lee B, Gho G, Kim S, Kim Hs, Ahn S, et al. The History and Future Development Direction of the Korean Social Security System. Sejong, Korea: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2019.

17. Shin Y, Lee S, Ong Y, Suh Y, Han S, Byoungho C. Survey of Health and Medical Personnel. Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2021.