2. Habibzadeh F, Marcovitch H. Plagiarism: the emperor's new clothes. Eur Sci Ed. 2011; 37:67–69.
3. Steen RG. Authorship: to be or not to be? Eur Sci Ed. 2013; 39:6–8.
4. Norris SL, Holmer HK, Ogden LA, Selph SS, Fu R. Conflict of interest disclosures for clinical practice guidelines in the national guideline clearinghouse. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e47343.
5. Ioannidis JP, Tatsioni A, Karassa FB. Who is afraid of reviewers' comments? or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010; 40:285–287.
6. Marusic A, Marusic M. Small scientific journals from small countries: breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy. Croat Med J. 1999; 40:508–514.
7. Krell FT. Should editors influence journal impact factors? Learn Publ. 2010; 23:59–62.
8. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Biomedical journal editing: elements of success. Croat Med J. 2011; 52:423–428.
9. Marušić A, Gasparyan AY, Kitas GD. Promoting transparent and accurate reporting of research studies in rheumatology: endorsement of reporting guidelines in rheumatology journals. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013; doi:
10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.01.005.
10. Gasparyan AY, Kitas GD. Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals. Croat Med J. 2012; 53:386–389.
11. Xiao-Jun H, Zhen-Ying C. Excellent editors need to be good authors too. Learn Publ. 2013; 26:42–44.
12. Bornmann L, Marx W. The h index as a research performance indicator. Eur Sci Ed. 2011; 37:77–80.
13. Gasparyan AY. Familiarizing with science editors' associations. Croat Med J. 2011; 52:735–739.