Anat Cell Biol.  2025 Mar;58(1):112-121. 10.5115/acb.24.197.

Integrating virtual reality to enhance remote teaching of anatomy during unprecedented times

• Boillat T
• Prithishkumar IJ
• Suresh D
• Naidoo N

• KMID: 2565962
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5115/acb.24.197

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a global paradigm shift in the teaching of human anatomy. Most institutions successfully transitioned from traditional in-person teaching methods, to various distance-learning strategies. Since virtual reality (VR) offers immersive three-dimensional (3D) experiences, this study investigated students’ experiences regarding the capacity of VR to support distance-learning of anatomy. Using the VR application, 3D Organon Virtual Reality Anatomy, anatomy instructors pre-recorded learning content as 360-degree videos with live voice-over and integrated it into the teaching material of the MBBS first-year abdomen, pelvis, and perineum-structure and function course. A 19-item 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, comprising of two major categories, “VR experience in anatomy lessons” and “VR in anatomy lessons vs. traditional cadaveric dissection” was disseminated. Post-evaluation analysis revealed a response rate of 63.5%. Almost 70% of students agreed that VR was instrumental in solidifying their theoretical understanding and improved spatial awareness with better retention of anatomical relationships. Approximately 50% wanted to continue using VR even if instruction becomes onsite. Though 72% of participants agree that VR addressed the session learning objectives only 24% agree that it is similar or better than cadaveric dissection, thus preferring cadaveric dissection to VR. Only 12.1% agree that VR is more beneficial to cadaveric dissection. Our exploration into the integration of VR technology in anatomy teaching has revealed promising opportunities. While VR can augment traditional teaching methods in unprecedented times such as war, floods or global pandemic, it should not replace hands-on cadaveric learning entirely, but rather complement existing approaches.

Keyword

Anatomy; Virtual reality; Pandemics; COVID-19

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Demonstration of faculty instructor recording a 360° video using the virtual reality interface.

• 

  Fig. 2 (A) Appearance of a VR-recorded video when the 360° feature is activated. (B) Rendering of a VR-recorded video on a personal device. VR, virtual reality.

• 

  Fig. 3 Digital information sheet and consent document that was disseminated to students.

Reference

References

1. Ooi SZY, Ooi R. 2020; Impact of SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic on the future of cadaveric dissection anatomical teaching. Med Educ Online. 25:1823089. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1823089. PMID: 32930069. PMCID: PMC7534261.

2. Yoo H, Kim D, Lee YM, Rhyu IJ. 2021; Adaptations in anatomy education during COVID-19. J Korean Med Sci. 36:e13. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e13. PMID: 33398947. PMCID: PMC7781853.

3. Naidoo N, Satyapal KS, Lazarus L. 2021; Could COVID-19 trigger a rebirth in anatomy education? A glimpse of anatomists' responses to pandemics of the past and present. SN Compr Clin Med. 3:784–9. DOI: 10.1007/s42399-021-00813-7. PMID: 33615143. PMCID: PMC7884097.

4. Harmon DJ, Attardi SM, Barremkala M, Bentley DC, Brown KM, Dennis JF, Goldman HM, Harrell KM, Klein BA, Ramnanan CJ, Richtsmeier JT, Farkas GJ. 2021; An analysis of anatomy education before and during COVID-19: May-August 2020. Anat Sci Educ. 14:132–47. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2051. PMID: 33387389.

5. Yan Y, Cheng X, Zhou C, Yang X, Li YQ. 2021; The perceptions of anatomy teachers for different majors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national Chinese survey. Med Educ Online. 26:1897267. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1897267. PMID: 33720807. PMCID: PMC7971280.

6. Naidoo N, Akhras A, Banerjee Y. 2020; Confronting the challenges of anatomy education in a competency-based medical curriculum during normal and unprecedented times (COVID-19 pandemic): pedagogical framework development and implementation. JMIR Med Educ. 6:e21701. DOI: 10.2196/21701. PMID: 32873536. PMCID: PMC7546732.

7. Evans DJR, Bay BH, Wilson TD, Smith CF, Lachman N, Pawlina W. 2020; Going virtual to support anatomy education: a STOPGAP in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Anat Sci Educ. 13:279–83. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1963. PMID: 32277598.

8. Farkas GJ, Mazurek E, Marone JR. 2016; Learning style versus time spent studying and career choice: which is associated with success in a combined undergraduate anatomy and physiology course? Anat Sci Educ. 9:121–31. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1563. PMID: 26301828. PMCID: PMC4918630.

9. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. 2010; The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 3:83–93. DOI: 10.1002/ase.139. PMID: 20205265.

10. Singal A, Bansal A, Chaudhary P. 2020; Cadaverless anatomy: darkness in the times of pandemic COVID-19. Morphologie. 104:147–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.morpho.2020.05.003. PMID: 32518047. PMCID: PMC7254017.

11. Darras KE, de Bruin ABH, Nicolaou S, Dahlström N, Persson A, van Merriënboer J, Forster BB. 2018; Is there a superior simulator for human anatomy education? How virtual dissection can overcome the anatomic and pedagogic limitations of cadaveric dissection. Med Teach. 40:752–3. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1451629. PMID: 29569960.

12. McLachlan JC. 2004; New path for teaching anatomy: living anatomy and medical imaging vs. dissection. Anat Rec B New Anat. 281:4–5. DOI: 10.1002/ar.b.20040. PMID: 15558778.

13. Banovac I, Katavić V, Blažević A, Bičanić I, Hladnik A, Kovačić N, Petanjek Z. 2021; The anatomy lesson of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: irreplaceable tradition (cadaver work) and new didactics of digital technology. Croat Med J. 62:173–86. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2021.62.173. PMID: 33938657. PMCID: PMC8107989.

14. Longhurst GJ, Stone DM, Dulohery K, Scully D, Campbell T, Smith CF. 2020; Strength, weakness, opportunity, threat (SWOT) analysis of the adaptations to anatomical education in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Anat Sci Educ. 13:301–11. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1967. PMID: 32306550. PMCID: PMC7264742.

15. Iwanaga J, Loukas M, Dumont AS, Tubbs RS. 2021; A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation. Clin Anat. 34:108–14. DOI: 10.1002/ca.23655. PMID: 32681805. PMCID: PMC7404762.

16. Yun YH, Shin DH, Choi HJ. 2024; Perspectives of medical students and developers regarding virtual reality, augmented reality, mixed reality, and 3D printing technologies: survey study. JMIR XR Spatial Comput. 1:e54230. DOI: 10.2196/54230.

17. Shao X, Yuan Q, Qian D, Ye Z, Chen G, le Zhuang K, Jiang X, Jin Y, Qiang D. 2020; Virtual reality technology for teaching neurosurgery of skull base tumor. BMC Med Educ. 20:3. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1911-5. PMID: 31900135. PMCID: PMC6942358.

18. Suh A, Prophet J. 2018; The state of immersive technology research: a literature analysis. Comput Hum Behav. 86:77–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.019.

19. Heather A, Chinnah T, Devaraj V. 2019; The use of virtual and augmented reality in anatomy teaching. MedEdPublish (2016). 8:77. DOI: 10.15694/mep.2019.000077.1. PMID: 38089368. PMCID: PMC10712594.

20. Karbasi Z, Niakan Kalhori SR. 2020; Application and evaluation of virtual technologies for anatomy education to medical students: a review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 34:163. DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.34.163. PMID: 33816362. PMCID: PMC8004573.

21. Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. 2017; The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 10:549–59. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1696. PMID: 28419750.

22. Fairén M, Moyés J, Insa E. 2020; VR4Health: personalized teaching and learning anatomy using VR. J Med Syst. 44:94. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-020-01550-5. PMID: 32193612. PMCID: PMC7082407.

23. Bisht B, Hope A, Paul MK. 2019; From papyrus leaves to bioprinting and virtual reality: history and innovation in anatomy. Anat Cell Biol. 52:226–35. DOI: 10.5115/acb.18.213. PMID: 31598350. PMCID: PMC6773896.

24. AlGerafi MAM, Zhou Y, Oubibi M, Wijaya TT. 2023; Unlocking the potential: a comprehensive evaluation of augmented reality and virtual reality in education. Electronics. 12:3953. DOI: 10.3390/electronics12183953.

25. Tavakol M, Dennick R. 2011; Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2:53–5. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd. PMID: 28029643. PMCID: PMC4205511.

26. Prithishkumar IJ, Michael SA. 2014; Understanding your student: using the VARK model. J Postgrad Med. 60:183–6. DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.132337. PMID: 24823519.

27. Simić B, Mešić V, Đapo N, Šapić IM, Vidak A, Alić A, Erceg N. 2023; Simulation-based and video-based approaches to diversifying physics homework. J Balt Sci Educ. 22:506–19. DOI: 10.33225/jbse/23.22.506.

28. Castro PL, Ginés R, Ramírez JA, Mompeó B, Domínguez L, Rodríguez A, Maynar M, Rodriguez-Florido MA. 2023; Study on the acceptance of virtual reality as a complement to the study of human anatomy. Educ Médica. 24:100820. DOI: 10.1016/j.edumed.2023.100820.

29. Brown KE, Heise N, Eitel CM, Nelson J, Garbe BA, Meyer CA, Ivie KR Jr, Clapp TR. 2023; A large-scale, multiplayer virtual reality deployment: a novel approach to distance education in human anatomy. Med Sci Educ. 33:409–21. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-023-01751-w. PMID: 36820280. PMCID: PMC9933027.

30. Codd AM, Choudhury B. 2011; Virtual reality anatomy: is it comparable with traditional methods in the teaching of human forearm musculoskeletal anatomy? Anat Sci Educ. 4:119–25. DOI: 10.1002/ase.214. PMID: 21480538.

31. Sinou N, Sinou N, Filippou D. 2023; Virtual reality and augmented reality in anatomy education during COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus. 15:e35170. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35170.

32. Dankbaar MEW, Storm DJ, Teeuwen IC, Schuit SCE. 2014; A blended design in acute care training: similar learning results, less training costs compared with a traditional format. Perspect Med Educ. 3:289–99. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-014-0109-0. PMID: 24477971. PMCID: PMC4152470.

33. Ghosh SK. 2015; Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era. Anat Cell Biol. 48:153–69. DOI: 10.5115/acb.2015.48.3.153. PMID: 26417475. PMCID: PMC4582158.

34. Alraddadi A. 2021; Literature review of anatomical variations: clinical significance, identification approach, and teaching strategies. Cureus. 13:e14451. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14451.

35. Palmer EG, Reddy RK, Laughey W. 2020; Teaching professionalism to medical students using dissection-based anatomy education: a practical guide. Med Sci Educ. 31:203–13. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-01137-2. PMID: 33163287. PMCID: PMC7598239.

36. Manyama M, Stafford R, Mazyala E, Lukanima A, Magele N, Kidenya BR, Kimwaga E, Msuya S, Kauki J. 2016; Improving gross anatomy learning using reciprocal peer teaching. BMC Med Educ. 16:95. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0617-1. PMID: 27000752. PMCID: PMC4802611.

37. Dissabandara LO, Nirthanan SN, Khoo TK, Tedman R. 2015; Role of cadaveric dissections in modern medical curricula: a study on student perceptions. Anat Cell Biol. 48:205–12. DOI: 10.5115/acb.2015.48.3.205. PMID: 26417481. PMCID: PMC4582164.

38. Webb AL, Smyth L, Hafiz M, Valter K. 2022; The question of dissection in medical training: not just "if," but "when"? A student perspective. Anat Sci Educ. 15:281–90. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2168. PMID: 34995414. PMCID: PMC9306682.

39. Jiang H, Vimalesvaran S, Wang JK, Lim KB, Mogali SR, Car LT. 2022; Virtual reality in medical students' education: scoping review. JMIR Med Educ. 8:e34860. DOI: 10.2196/34860. PMID: 35107421. PMCID: PMC8851326.

40. Venkatesan M, Mohan H, Ryan JR, Schürch CM, Nolan GP, Frakes DH, Coskun AF. 2021; Virtual and augmented reality for biomedical applications. Cell Rep Med. 2:100348. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100348. PMID: 34337564. PMCID: PMC8324499.

41. Wang CY, Yin T, Ma KH, Shyu JF, Cheng CP, Wang YC, Huang YL, Chiang MH. 2023; Enhancing anatomy education through cooperative learning: harnessing virtual reality for effective gross anatomy learning. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 24:e00100–23. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00100-23. PMID: 38108010. PMCID: PMC10720469.

42. Kolla S, Elgawly M, Gaughan JP, Goldman E. 2020; Medical student perception of a virtual reality training module for anatomy education. Med Sci Educ. 30:1201–10. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-00993-2. PMID: 34457783. PMCID: PMC8368686.

43. Miltykh I, Kafarov ES, Covantsev S, Dadashev AS, Skarlis AA, Zenin OK. 2023; A new dimension in medical education: virtual reality in anatomy during COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Anat. 36:1007–15. DOI: 10.1002/ca.24098. PMID: 37485993.

44. Sala N. Choi A, Dailey-Hebert A, Estes JS, editors. Vitual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality in education: a brief overview. Current and porspective applications of vitural reality in higher education. IGI Global;2021. p. 48–73. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-4960-5.ch003.

45. Hu-Au E, Lee JJ. 2017; Virtural reality in education: a tool for learning in the experience age. Int J Inov Educ. 4:215–26. DOI: 10.1504/IJIIE.2017.091481.

46. Farra SL, Gneuhs M, Hodgson E, Kawosa B, Miller ET, Simon A, Timm N, Hausfeld J. 2019; Comparative cost of virtual reality training and live exercises for training hospital workers for evacuation. Comput Inform Nurs. 37:446–54. DOI: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000540. PMID: 31166203. PMCID: PMC7231540.