Anat Cell Biol.  2021 Sep;54(3):332-339. 10.5115/acb.21.006.

Online educational methods vs. traditional teaching of anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki
  • 2Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Abstract

Aim of the present study was to determine the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on anatomy teaching to medical and dental students comparing the traditional anatomy teaching with three remote teaching modalities. A cross-sectional study was conducted among undergraduate medical and dental students of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Four hundred and twenty students who attended anatomy classes during COVID-19 outbreak in Greece, were asked to fill in a questionnaire of 22 questions evaluating the formats of the different courses provided. Each student was asked to complete the questionnaire anonymously via the Google Forms® platform. A total of 200 students participated. During the lockdown, 59.5% of students attended all online anatomy lectures compared to 44.5% in the pre-pandemic year. Overall, the higher percentage of 73.5% was satisfied with the traditional anatomy teaching, instead of 56% which were satisfied with the effectiveness of online anatomy lectures. Asking whether any remote educational method can partially or completely replace the traditional anatomy teaching, the majority of students replied “no” for all the three remote modalities. The traditional anatomy teaching remains the most preferred and effective teaching modality. The students ranked online anatomy lectures and pre-recorded anatomy lectures in second place in terms of effectiveness and preference. The development of remote learning methods has increased students’ active participation in anatomy lessons, but significantly negatively affected the students’ performance at exams. Remote learning cannot replace the traditional anatomy teaching method, but online lectures could be incorporated into anatomy curricula as an additional tool.

Keyword

Anatomy; Education; Teaching; COVID-19; Online education

Reference

References

1. Lewis KO, Cidon MJ, Seto TL, Chen H, Mahan JD. 2014; Leveraging e-learning in medical education. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 44:150–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2014.01.004. PMID: 24981664.
Article
2. Harden RM. 2006; Trends and the future of postgraduate medical education. Emerg Med J. 23:798–802. DOI: 10.1136/emj.2005.033738. PMID: 16988312. PMCID: PMC2579604.
Article
3. Green RA, Whitburn LY, Zacharias A, Byrne G, Hughes DL. 2018; The relationship between student engagement with online content and achievement in a blended learning anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 11:471–7. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1761. PMID: 29236359.
Article
4. Trelease RB. 2016; From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: how computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anat Sci Educ. 9:583–602. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1620. PMID: 27163170.
Article
5. Estai M, Bunt S. 2016; Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat. 208:151–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010. PMID: 26996541.
Article
6. Lochner L, Wieser H, Waldboth S, Mischo-Kelling M. 2016; Combining traditional anatomy lectures with e-learning activities: how do students perceive their learning experience? Int J Med Educ. 7:69–74. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.56b5.0369. PMID: 26897012. PMCID: PMC4764246.
Article
7. inivasan DK Sr. 2020; Medical students' perceptions and an anatomy teacher's personal experience using an e-learning platform for tutorials during the COVID-19 crisis. Anat Sci Educ. 13:318–9. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1970. PMID: 32374937.
Article
8. Singal A, Bansal A, Chaudhary P. 2020; Cadaverless anatomy: darkness in the times of pandemic COVID-19. Morphologie. 104:147–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.morpho.2020.05.003. PMID: 32518047. PMCID: PMC7254017.
Article
9. Korkmaz FT, Gürses IA. 2020; Initial effects of COVID-19 pandemic on graduate anatomy education in Turkey. Anatomy. 14:123–33. DOI: 10.2399/ana.20.763479.
Article
10. Bawa P. 2016; Retention in online courses: exploring issues and solutions- a literature review. SAGE Open. doi: 10.1177/ 2158244015621777. DOI: 10.1177/2158244015621777.
11. Sharma K, Deo G, Timalsina S, Joshi A, Shrestha N, Neupane HC. 2020; Online learning in the face of COVID-19 pandemic: assessment of students' satisfaction at Chitwan Medical College of Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 18:40–7. DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v18i2.32943.
Article
12. Cuschieri S, Agius JC. 2020; Spotlight on the shift to remote anatomical teaching during COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives and experiences from the University of Malta. Anat Sci Educ. 13:671–9. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2020. PMID: 32956579. PMCID: PMC7537517.
Article
13. Seada AI, Mostafa MF. 2017; Students' satisfaction and barriers of e-learning course among nursing students, Mansoura University. World J Nurs Sci. 3:170–8.
14. George PP, Papachristou N, Belisario JM, Wang W, Wark PA, Cotic Z, Rasmussen K, Sluiter R, Riboli-Sasco E, Tudor Car L, Musulanov EM, Molina JA, Heng BH, Zhang Y, Wheeler EL, Al Shorbaji N, Majeed A, Car J. 2014; Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: a systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. J Glob Health. 4:010406. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.04.010406. PMID: 24976965. PMCID: PMC4073252.
Article
15. Pourghaznein T, Sabeghi H, Shariatinejad K. 2015; Effects of e-learning, lectures, and role playing on nursing students' knowledge acquisition, retention and satisfaction. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 29:162. PMID: 26000257. PMCID: PMC4431360.
16. Zhang Q, He YJ, Zhu YH, Dai MC, Pan MM, Wu JQ, Zhang X, Gu YE, Wang FF, Xu XR, Qu F. 2020; The evaluation of online course of Traditional Chinese Medicine for MBBS international students during the COVID-19 epidemic period. Integr Med Res. 9:100449. DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100449. PMID: 32632357. PMCID: PMC7280829.
17. Singh K, ivastav S Sr, Bhardwaj A, Dixit A, Misra S. 2020; Medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a single institution experience. Indian Pediatr. 57:678–9. DOI: 10.1007/s13312-020-1899-2. PMID: 32366728. PMCID: PMC7387263.
Article
18. Mirza AA, Al-Abdulkareem M. 2011; Models of e-learning adopted in the Middle East. Appl Comput Inf. 9:83–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.aci.2011.05.001.
Article
19. Tarus JK, Gichoya D, Muumbo A. 2015; Challenges of implementing e-learning in Kenya: a case of Kenyan public universities. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 16:120–41. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1816.
Article
20. Bahramnezhad F, Asgari P, Ghiyasvandian S, Shiri M, Bahramnezhad F. 2016; The learners' satisfaction of e-learning: a review article. Am J Educ Res. 4:347–52.
21. Abbasi S, Ayoob T, Malik A, Memon SI. 2020; Perceptions of students regarding E-learning during COVID-19 at a private medical college. Pak J Med Sci. 36(COVID19-S4):S57–61. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2766. PMID: 32582315. PMCID: PMC7306963.
Article
22. Al-Fahad FN. 2010; The learners' satisfaction toward online e-learning implemented in the College of Applied Studies and Community Service, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia: can e-learning replace the conventional system of education? Turkish Online J Distance Educ. 11:61–72.
23. Johnson AM, Jacovina ME, Russell DG, Soto CM. Crossley SA, McNamara DS, editors. 2017. Challenges and solutions when using technologies in the classroom. Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction. Taylor and Francis;New York: p. 13–29. DOI: 10.4324/9781315647500-2.
Article
24. Liaw SS, Huang HM, Chen GD. 2007; Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Comput Educ. 49:1066–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.001.
Article
25. Cho MJ, Hwang YI. 2013; Students' perception of anatomy education at a Korean medical college with respect to time and contents. Anat Cell Biol. 46:157–62. DOI: 10.5115/acb.2013.46.2.157. PMID: 23869263. PMCID: PMC3713280.
Article
26. Pather N, Blyth P, Chapman JA, Dayal MR, Flack NAMS, Fogg QA, Green RA, Hulme AK, Johnson IP, Meyer AJ, Morley JW, Shortland PJ, Štrkalj G, Štrkalj M, Valter K, Webb AL, Woodley SJ, Lazarus MD. 2020; Forced disruption of anatomy education in Australia and New Zealand: an acute response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Anat Sci Educ. 13:284–300. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1968. PMID: 32306555. PMCID: PMC7264523.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ACB
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr