J Urol Oncol.  2024 Nov;22(3):211-223. 10.22465/juo.244800520026.

Assessing Patient Risk, Benefit, and Outcomes in Drug Development: A Decade of Abiraterone Clinical Trials

Affiliations
  • 1Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
  • 2Department of Urology, Sparrow Hospital, Lansing, MI, USA
  • 3Michigan State Urology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
  • 4Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • 5Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA

Abstract

Purpose
Our study aimed to evaluate the risk and benefit profiles of clinical trials using abiraterone in cancer treatment.
Materials and Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted on May 24, 2023, using databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We extracted data on adverse events, progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), and prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA-RR). The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were used to assess risks, while ORR and PSA-RR were used to assess benefits. Trials were categorized as positive, negative, or indeterminate based on their safety profiles and efficacy outcomes.
Results
Nearly all clinical trials testing abiraterone in prostate cancer showed promising outcomes with 89% of studies meeting their endpoint. Our study supports abiraterone’s use in prostate cancer, its only U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved indication to treat, with a median ORR of 20.0% and a median PSA-RR of 42.0%. However, when looking at the 3 novel indications tested, the risk-to-benefit profile was similar to that of its original approval. Even though most novel indications failed to meet their primary endpoint, the overall toxicity profile was similar to that found in prostate cancer.
Conclusion
Abiraterone showed an overall risk-to-benefit portfolio that supports the use of its treatment in prostate cancer. Although the primary endpoints in ovarian and breast cancer trials were not met, the use was appropriate when assessing how the mechanism of action for abiraterone could be beneficial in patients with these types of cancers.

Keyword

Prostatic neoplasms; Abiraterone; Clinical trials; Risk assessment; Off-label use; United States Food and Drug Administration
Full Text Links
  • JUO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr