Ann Liver Transplant.  2021 May;1(1):10-17. 10.52604/alt.21.0003.

Absence of influence of the Korean MELD score-based liver allocation system on pretransplant MELD score in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score-based allocation system was started in 2016 in Korea. This study aimed to analyze the profiles of adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the pre- and post-MELD eras.
Methods
This study was a retrospective double-arm analysis using a single-institution LDLT cohort. We compared the LDLT recipient profiles by focusing on pretransplant MELD score for 4 years before and after the introduction of the MELD scorebased allocation system. Patients without and with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were categorized as Group A and B in the pre-MELD era and Group C and D in the post-MELD era, respectively.
Results
The number of patients in Groups A, B, C and D was 615, 599, 704 and 713, respectively; and their MELD scores were 19.0±9.4, 11.2±5.6, 17.9±8.5 and 11.6±5.7, respectively. Clinical parameters of liver cirrhosis indicate that Group A had worse general conditions than Group C; and Groups B and D had similar general conditions. The comparative analysis between Groups A and C revealed the mean and median MELD scores as 19.0±9.4 and 17.9±8.5 (p=0.009), and 16 and 15 (p=0.077), respectively. The comparative analysis between Groups B and D revealed the mean and median MELD scores as 11.2±5.6 and 11.6±5.7 (p=0.14), and 9 and 9 (p=0.14), respectively.
Conclusion
Median pretransplant MELD score was in the range of 15-16 in LDLT recipients without HCC and 9 in those with HCC. Introduction of MELD score in deceased donor organ allocation system resulted in a marginal decrease in the pretransplant MELD score in patients undergoing LDLT without HCC, but no change in those with HCC.

Keyword

MELD score; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Living donor; Deceased donor; Organ allocation

Figure

  • Figure 1 Comparison of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score level in adult living donor liver transplantation recipients. Groups A and B indicate patients without and with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) respectively in the pre-MELD era. Groups C and D indicate patients without and with HCC respectively in the post-MELD era.

  • Figure 2 Comparison of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score level in adult living donor liver transplantation recipients. (A) Comparison of the patients without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the pre-MELD (Group A) and post-MELD (Group C) eras. (B) Comparison of the patients with HCC in the pre-MELD (Group B) and post-MELD (Group D) eras.

  • Figure 3 Comparison of the model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD) level according to the Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) and grouping with the timing of liver transplantation and the status of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). (A) Comparison of the incidence of the KONOS status according to the groups. (B) Comparison of the proportion of the KONOS status according to the groups. Groups A and B indicate patients without and with HCC respectively in the pre-MELD era. Groups C and D indicate patients without and with HCC respectively in the post-MELD era.


Cited by  1 articles

Twenty-year longitudinal follow-up after liver transplantation: a single-center experience with 251 consecutive patients
Minjae Kim, Shin Hwang, Chul-Soo Ahn, Deok-Bog Moon, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Ki-Hun Kim, Jung-Man Namgoong, Woo-Hyoung Kang, Young-In Yoon, Hwui-Dong Cho, Byeong-Gon Na, Sang Hoon Kim, Sung-Gyu Lee
Korean J Transplant. 2022;36(1):45-53.    doi: 10.4285/kjt.21.0031.


Reference

References

1. Lee SG, Moon DB, Hwang S, Ahn CS, Kim KH, Song GW, et al. 2015; Liver transplantation in Korea: past, present, and future. Transplant Proc. 47:705–708. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.02.015. PMID: 25891715.
2. Yoon YI, Lee SG. 2019; Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an Asian perspective. Dig Dis Sci. 64:993–1000. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05551-4. PMID: 30895483.
3. Lee HW, Suh KS. 2017; Advancements of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 47:93–100. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyw168. PMID: 28173136.
4. Bollinger RR, Cho WH. 2004; Organ allocation for transplantation in the USA and Korea: the changing roles of equity and utility. Yonsei Med J. 45:1035–1042. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.6.1035. PMID: 15627294.
5. Hwang S, Ahn CS, Kim KH, Moon DB, Ha TY, Song GW, et al. 2013; Survival rates among patients awaiting deceased donor liver transplants at a single high-volume Korean center. Transplant Proc. 45:2995–2996. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.08.070. PMID: 24157021.
6. Min SI, Ahn C, Han DJ, Kim SI, Chung SY, Lee SK, et al. 2015; To achieve national self-sufficiency: recent progresses in deceased donation in Korea. Transplantation. 99:765–770. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000412. PMID: 25226175.
7. Lee J, Lee JG, Jung I, Joo DJ, Kim SI, Kim MS. Advisory Committee on Improving Liver Allocation. 2019; Development of a Korean liver allocation system using model for end stage liver disease scores: a nationwide, multicenter study. Sci Rep. 9:7495. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43965-2. PMID: 31097768. PMCID: PMC6522508.
8. Ha SM, Hwang S, Song GW, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Ha TY, et al. 2017; Successful introduction of model for end-stage liver disease scoring in deceased donor liver transplantation in Korea: analysis of first 1 year experience at a high-volume transplantation center. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 21:199–204. DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2017.21.4.199. PMID: 29264582. PMCID: PMC5736739.
9. Ha HS, Hong JJ, Kim IO, Lee SR, Lee AY, Ha TY, et al. 2019; Deceased donor liver transplantation under the Korean model for end-stage liver disease score-based liver allocation system: 2-year allocation results at a high-volume transplantation center. Korean J Transplant. 33:112–117. DOI: 10.4285/jkstn.2019.33.4.112.
10. Jung BH, Hwang S, Song GW, Jung DH, Ha TY, Park GC, et al. 2015; Updated status of deceased-donor liver graft allocation for high-urgency adult patients in a Korean high-volume liver transplantation center. Transplant Proc. 47:580–583. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.02.014. PMID: 25891690.
11. Moon DB, Lee SG, Chung YK, Kang WH, Kim KH, Song GW, et al. 2021; Over 500 liver transplants including more than 400 living-donor liver transplants in 2019 at Asan Medical Center. Transplant Proc. 53:83–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.027. PMID: 33010937.
12. Park GC, Hwang S, Jung DH, Song GW, Ahn CS, Kim KH, et al. 2020; Is renal replacement therapy necessary in deceased donor liver transplantation candidates with hepatorenal syndrome?: a 2-year experience at a high-volume center. Ann Surg Treat Res. 98:102–109. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2020.98.2.102. PMID: 32051819. PMCID: PMC7002878.
13. Moon DB, Lee SG, Kang WH, Song GW, Jung DH, Park GC, et al. 2017; Adult living donor liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic liver failure in high-model for end-stage liver disease score patients. Am J Transplant. 17:1833–1842. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14198. PMID: 28097804. PMCID: PMC5516156.
14. Ogawa K, Kaido T, Okajima H, Fujimoto Y, Yoshizawa A, Yagi S, et al. 2019; Impact of pretreatments on outcomes after living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 26:73–81. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.602. PMID: 30561147.
15. Polat KY, Acar S, Gencdal G, Yazar S, Kargi A, Donmez R, et al. 2020; Hepatocellular carcinoma and liver transplantation: a single-center experience. Transplant Proc. 52:259–264. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.10.029. PMID: 31911056.
16. Uchiyama H, Itoh S, Yoshizumi T, Ikegami T, Harimoto N, Soejima Y, et al. 2017; Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: results of prospective patient selection by Kyushu University criteria in 7 years. HPB (Oxford). 19:1082–1090. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.08.004. PMID: 28888776.
17. Yong CC, Elsarawy AM, Wang SH, Lin TS, Wang CC, Li WF, et al. 2018; The surgical challenges of salvage living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma; the cumulative experience of 100 cases - a retrospective cohort study and a propensity score analysis. Int J Surg. 54(Pt A):187–192. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.041. PMID: 29723674.
18. Cho CW, Choi GS, Kim JM, Kwon CHD, Kim DJ, Joh JW. 2018; Clinical usefulness of transarterial chemoembolization response prior to liver transplantation as predictor of optimal timing for living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg Treat Res. 95:111–120. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.2.111. PMID: 30079328. PMCID: PMC6073044.
Full Text Links
  • ALT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr