J Korean Med Sci.  2024 Oct;39(41):e288. 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e288.

Nationwide Evaluation of the Validity of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score Method in Korean Regional Trauma Centers Using Multi-Institutional Large-Scale Data

• Ha M
• Yu S
• Kim BC
• Choi HJ

• KMID: 2560597
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e288

Abstract

Background
The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method is a widely used tool for assessing patient severity and predicting survival probability in trauma care. However, its accuracy and applicability in the Korean context, particularly for neurotrauma patients, have not been thoroughly validated yet. Previous studies at a single institution have identified significant discrepancies between TRISS predictions and actual outcomes, particularly in severe neurotrauma cases. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the TRISS method on a national scale using data from multiple regional trauma centers (RTCs) in Korea.
Methods
We utilized data from the Korea Trauma Data Bank collected from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021. A total of 70,785 patients were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The probability of survival was calculated using the TRISS method. Patients were categorized into neurotrauma and non-neurotrauma groups. Misclassification rate (MR) was measured by comparing the predicted survival or death using the TRISS method with the actual outcomes to assess the predictive validity of the TRISS method.
Results
This study included 28,285 neurotrauma patients and 42,503 non-neurotrauma patients. The neurotrauma group had higher actual deaths (2,401) than the non-neurotrauma group (809). The neurotrauma group also had a significantly higher mortality rate per 100,000 population (8,489.50 vs. 1,903.40). MR was significantly higher in neurotrauma patients (8.07%) than in non-neurotrauma patients (1.92%). Patients with severe head injuries (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8) had the highest MR (32.27%).
Conclusion
Our study confirms that the TRISS method's misclassification issues observed at a single institution are prevalent across multiple RTCs in Korea. The accuracy of the TRISS method decreases with increasing injury severity, particularly in neurotrauma patients. These findings highlight the need to revise evaluation criteria and develop more accurate prediction models tailored to the Korean trauma care system. Implementing these changes will enhance the reliability of trauma care assessments and ensure more equitable support for RTCs, ultimately improving the quality and equity of trauma care in Korea.

Keyword

Trauma Severity Indices; Brain Injuries; Traumatic; Trauma Centers; Mortality; Survivor; Korea

Reference

1. Ha M, Yu S, Lee JH, Kim BC, Choi HJ. Does the probability of survival calculated by the trauma and injury severity score method accurately reflect the severity of neurotrauma patients admitted to regional trauma centers in Korea? J Korean Med Sci. 2023; 38(34):e265. PMID: 37644681.

2. Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma score and the injury severity score. J Trauma. 1987; 27(4):370–378. PMID: 3106646.

3. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Gann DS, Gennarelli TA, Flanagan ME. A revision of the trauma score. J Trauma. 1989; 29(5):623–629. PMID: 2657085.

4. Gennarelli TA, Wodzin E. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005: Update 2008. Barrington, IL, USA: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine;2008.

5. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974; 14(3):187–196. PMID: 4814394.

6. Schluter PJ, Nathens A, Neal ML, Goble S, Cameron CM, Davey TM, et al. Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) coefficients 2009 revision. J Trauma. 2010; 68(4):761–770. PMID: 20386271.

7. Seol DH, Seo KS, Park JB, Chung JM, Seo JS, Lee JH, et al. Alternative method of trauma patient evaluation and quality assessment. J Korean Soc Emerg Med. 2002; 13(2):193–200.

8. Joh YG, Um JW, Kim NR, Lee MS, Jung KH, Hong YS. Comparison of the outcomes for abdominal trauma patients treated using the TRISS method. J Trauma Inj. 2000; 13(1):21–27.

9. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, Lawnick MM, Bain LW, Gann DS, et al. A new characterization of injury severity. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5):539–545. PMID: 2342136.

10. Demetriades D, Chan L, Velmanos GV, Sava J, Preston C, Gruzinski G, et al. TRISS methodology: an inappropriate tool for comparing outcomes between trauma centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2001; 193(3):250–254. PMID: 11548794.

11. Moon JH, Seo BR, Jang JW, Lee JK, Moon HS. Evaluation of probability of survival using trauma and injury severity score method in severe neurotrauma patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013; 54(1):42–46. PMID: 24044080.

12. Wong GK, Teoh J, Yeung J, Chan E, Siu E, Woo P, et al. Outcomes of traumatic brain injury in Hong Kong: validation with the TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT models. J Clin Neurosci. 2013; 20(12):1693–1696. PMID: 23993210.

13. Margulies DR, Cryer HG, McArthur DL, Lee SS, Bongard FS, Fleming AW. Patient volume per surgeon does not predict survival in adult level I trauma centers. J Trauma. 2001; 50(4):597–601. PMID: 11303152.

14. Lane PL, Doig G, Mikrogianakis A, Charyk ST, Stefanits T. An evaluation of Ontario trauma outcomes and the development of regional norms for Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) analysis. J Trauma. 1996; 41(4):731–734. PMID: 8858037.