J Korean Med Sci.  2023 Aug;38(34):e265. 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e265.

Does the Probability of Survival Calculated by the Trauma and Injury Severity Score Method Accurately Reflect the Severity of Neurotrauma Patients Admitted to Regional Trauma Centers in Korea?

• Ha M
• Yu S
• Lee JH
• Kim BC
• Choi HJ

• KMID: 2545543
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e265

Abstract

Background
Assessing and improving the quality of trauma care is crucial in modern trauma systems and centers. In Korea, evaluations of regional trauma centers are conducted annually to assess and improve trauma management quality. This includes using the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method to calculate the W-score and mortality Observed-to-Expected ratio (O:E ratio), which are used to evaluate the quality of care. We analyzed the potential for overestimation of the probability of survival using TRISS method for patients with neurotrauma, as well as the potential for errors when evaluating and comparing regional trauma centers.
Methods
We included patients who visited the regional trauma center between 2019 and 2021 and compared their probability of survival of the TRISS method, W-score, mortality O:E ratio, and misclassification rates. The patient groups were further subdivided into smaller subgroups based on age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and Injury Severity Score, and comparisons were made between the neurotrauma and non-neurotrauma groups within each subgroup.
Results
A total of 4,045 patients were enrolled in the study, with 1,639 of them having neurotrauma. The neurotrauma patient group had a W-score of −0.68 and a mortality O:E ratio of 1.044. The misclassification rate was found to be 13.3%, and patients with a GCS of 8 or less had a higher misclassification rate of 37.4%.
Conclusion
The limitations of using the TRISS method for predicting outcomes in patients with severe neurotrauma are exposed in this study. The TRISS methodology demonstrated a high misclassification rate of approximately 40% in subgroups of patients with GCS less than 9, indicating that it may be less reliable in predicting outcomes for severely injured patients with low GCS. Clinicians and researchers should be cautious when using the TRISS method and consider alternative methods to evaluate patient outcomes and compare the quality of care provided by different trauma centers.

Keyword

Brain Injuries; Traumatic; Trauma Centers; Mortality; Survivor; Korea

Reference

1. Kwon J, Lee M, Moon J, Huh Y, Song S, Kim S, et al. National follow-up survey of preventable trauma death rate in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2022; 37(50):e349. PMID: 36573386.

2. Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 1987; 27(4):370–378. PMID: 3106646.

3. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Gann DS, Gennarelli TA, Flanagan ME. A revision of the Trauma Score. J Trauma. 1989; 29(5):623–629. PMID: 2657085.

4. Gennarelli TA, Wodzin E, editors. The Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005. . Association for the Barrington, IL, USA: Advancement of Automotive Medicine;2008.

5. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974; 14(3):187–196. PMID: 4814394.

6. Schluter PJ, Nathens A, Neal ML, Goble S, Cameron CM, Davey TM, et al. Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) coefficients 2009 revision. J Trauma. 2010; 68(4):761–770. PMID: 20386271.

7. Seol DH, Seo KS, Park JB, Chung JM, Seo JS, Lee JH, et al. Alternative method of trauma patient evaluation and quality assessment. J Korean Soc Emerg Med. 2002; 13(2):193–200.

8. Joh YG, Um JW, Kim NR, Lee MS, Jung KH, Hong YS. Comparison of the outcomes for abdominal trauma patients treated using the TRISS method. J Korean Soc Traumatol. 2000; 13(1):21–27.

9. Jung K, Kwon J, Huh Y, Moon J, Hwang K, Cho HM, et al. National trauma system establishment based on implementation of regional trauma centers improves outcomes of trauma care: a follow-up observational study in South Korea. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022; 2(1):e0000162. PMID: 36962235.

10. Jung K, Lee JC, Kim J. Injury severity scoring system for trauma patients and trauma outcomes research in Korea. J Acute Care Surg. 2016; 6(1):11–17.

11. Mun SH, Chung KS. Characteristics of multiple trauma and quality assurance of trauma care. J Korean Soc Emerg Med. 1994; 5(1):34–47.

12. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Carnazzo AJ, Copes W, Fouty WJ. Trauma score. Crit Care Med. 1981; 9(9):672–676. PMID: 7273818.

13. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, Lawnick MM, Bain LW, Gann DS, et al. A new characterization of injury severity. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5):539–545. PMID: 2342136.

14. Demetriades D, Chan L, Velmanos GV, Sava J, Preston C, Gruzinski G, et al. TRISS methodology: an inappropriate tool for comparing outcomes between trauma centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2001; 193(3):250–254. PMID: 11548794.

15. Margulies DR, Cryer HG, McArthur DL, Lee SS, Bongard FS, Fleming AW. Patient volume per surgeon does not predict survival in adult level I trauma centers. J Trauma. 2001; 50(4):597–601. PMID: 11303152.

16. Lane PL, Doig G, Mikrogianakis A, Charyk ST, Stefanits T. An evaluation of Ontario trauma outcomes and the development of regional norms for Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) analysis. J Trauma. 1996; 41(4):731–734. PMID: 8858037.

17. Morris JA Jr, Auerbach PS, Marshall GA, Bluth RF, Johnson LG, Trunkey DD. The Trauma Score as a triage tool in the prehospital setting. JAMA. 1986; 256(10):1319–1325. PMID: 3747045.

18. Part 1: Guidelines for the management of penetrating brain injury. Introduction and methodology. J Trauma. 2001; 51(2):Suppl. S3–S6. PMID: 11505192.