Korean Circ J.  2024 Jul;54(7):395-397. 10.4070/kcj.2024.0139.

While Awaiting CT-FFR Era: A Novel Approach to Assess Functionally Significant Stenosis With On-Site CT-FFR

• Koh JS

• KMID: 2557978
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2024.0139

Reference

1. Dwivedi A, Al’Aref SJ, Lin FY, Min JK. Evaluation of atherosclerotic plaque in non-invasive coronary imaging. Korean Circ J. 2018; 48:124–133. PMID: 29441745.

2. Nielsen LH, Ortner N, Nørgaard BL, Achenbach S, Leipsic J, Abdulla J. The diagnostic accuracy and outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography vs. conventional functional testing in patients with stable angina pectoris: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 15:961–971. PMID: 24618659.

3. Danad I, Szymonifka J, Twisk JW, et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38:991–998. PMID: 27141095.

4. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41:407–477. PMID: 31504439.

5. Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. 1-year outcomes of FFR CT guided care in patients with suspected coronary disease: the PLATFORM Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68:435–445. PMID: 27470449.

6. Kay FU, Canan A, Abbara S. Future directions in coronary CT angiography: CT-fractional flow reserve, plaque vulnerability, and quantitative plaque assessment. Korean Circ J. 2020; 50:185–202. PMID: 31960635.

7. Hwang D, Park SH, Nam CW, et al. Diagnostic performance of on-site automatic coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve. Korean Circ J. 2024; 54:382–394. PMID: 38767442.

8. Kruk M, Wardziak Ł, Demkow M, et al. Workstation-based calculation of CTA-based FFR for intermediate stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 9:690–699. PMID: 26897667.

9. Yang DH, Kim YH, Roh JH, et al. Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 18:432–440. PMID: 27354345.

10. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Munnur RK, et al. Noninvasive CT-derived FFR based on structural and fluid analysis: a comparison with invasive FFR for detection of functionally significant stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10:663–673. PMID: 27771399.