Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab.  2024 Jun;29(3):156-160. 10.6065/apem.2448028.014.

Long-read next-generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of pediatric endocrine disorders

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Diversity Research, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2Department of Genome Medicine, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
  • 3Department of Molecular Endocrinology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Recent advances in long-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) have enabled researchers to identify several pathogenic variants overlooked by short-read NGS, array-based comparative genomic hybridization, and other conventional methods. Long-read NGS is particularly useful in the detection of structural variants and repeat expansions. Furthermore, it can be used for mutation screening in difficultto- sequence regions, as well as for DNA-methylation analyses and haplotype phasing. This mini-review introduces the usefulness of long-read NGS in the molecular diagnosis of pediatric endocrine disorders.

Keyword

Gene; Molecular analysis; Mutation; Nanopore; PacBio; Sequencer

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Genomic features for which long-read next-generation sequencing is advantageous over conventional methods.

  • Fig. 2. Schemas of chromothripsis/chromoanagenesis. This phenomenon is characterized by the shattering of one or a few chromosomes and their subsequent random realignment. This realignment can include deletion and duplication of chromosomal fragments.


Cited by  1 articles

Commentary on "Long-read next-generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of pediatric endocrine disorders"
Won Kyoung Cho
Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2024;29(3):141-141.    doi: 10.6065/apem.24224014edi03.


Reference

References

1. Eichler EE. Genetic variation, comparative genomics, and the diagnosis of disease. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381:64–74.
Article
2. Fukami M, Miyado M. Next generation sequencing and array-based comparative genomic hybridization for molecular diagnosis of pediatric endocrine disorders. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2017; 22:90–4.
Article
3. Lee C, Iafrate AJ, Brothman AR. Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders. Nat Genet. 2007; 39(7 Suppl):S48–54.
Article
4. Izumi Y, Suzuki E, Kanzaki S, Yatsuga S, Kinjo S, Igarashi M, et al. Genome-wide copy number analysis and systematic mutation screening in 58 patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Fertil Steril. 2014; 102:1130–6.
Article
5. Suga K, Imoto I, Ito H, Naruto T, Goji A, Osumi K, et al. Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of patients with congenital multiple anomalies and/or intellectual disabilities. J Med Invest. 2020; 67:246–9.
Article
6. Logsdon GA, Vollger MR, Eichler EE. Long-read human genome sequencing and its applications. Nat Rev Genet. 2020; 21:597–614.
Article
7. Oehler JB, Wright H, Stark Z, Mallett AJ, Schmitz U. The application of long-read sequencing in clinical settings. Hum Genomics. 2023; 17:73.
Article
8. Miller DE, Sulovari A, Wang T, Loucks H, Hoekzema K, Munson KM, et al. Targeted long-read sequencing identifies missing disease-causing variation. Am J Hum Genet. 2021; 108:1436–49.
Article
9. Conlin LK, Aref-Eshghi E, McEldrew DA, Luo M, Rajagopalan R. Long-read sequencing for molecular diagnostics in constitutional genetic disorders. Hum Mutat. 2022; 43:1531–44.
Article
10. Mastrorosa FK, Miller DE, Eichler EE. Applications of longread sequencing to Mendelian genetics. Genome Med. 2023; 15:42.
Article
11. Sharp AJ, Cheng Z, Eichler EE. Structural variation of the human genome. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2006; 7:407–42.
Article
12. Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR. The genomic basis of disease, mechanisms and assays for genomic disorders. Genome Dyn. 2006; 1:1–16.
Article
13. Miller DE, Hanna P, Galey M, Reyes M, Linglart A, Eichler EE, et al. Targeted long-read sequencing identifies a retrotransposon insertion as a cause of altered GNAS exon A/B methylation in a family with autosomal dominant pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1b (PHP1B). J Bone Miner Res. 2022; 37:1711–9.
Article
14. Taşkesen M, Collin GB, Evsikov AV, Güzel A, Özgül RK, Marshall JD, et al. Novel Alu retrotransposon insertion leading to Alström syndrome. Hum Genet. 2012; 131:407–13.
Article
15. Del Gobbo GF, Wang X, Couse M, Mackay L, Goldsmith C, Marshall AE, et al. Long-read genome sequencing reveals a novel intronic retroelement insertion in NR5A1 associated with 46,XY differences of sexual development. Am J Med Genet A. 2024; 194:e63522.
Article
16. Pfaff AL, Singleton LM, Kõks S. Mechanisms of diseaseassociated SINE-VNTR-Alus. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2022; 247:756–64.
17. Stevanovski I, Chintalaphani SR, Gamaarachchi H, Ferguson JM, Pineda SS, Scriba CK, et al. Comprehensive genetic diagnosis of tandem repeat expansion disorders with programmable targeted nanopore sequencing. Sci Adv. 2022; 8:e. abm5386.
Article
18. Kekou K, Sofocleous C, Papadimas G, Petichakis D, Svingou M, Pons RM, et al. A dynamic trinucleotide repeat (TNR) expansion in the DMD gene. Mol Cell Probes. 2016; 30:254–60.
Article
19. Miyatake S, Koshimizu E, Fujita A, Doi H, Okubo M, Wada T, et al. Rapid and comprehensive diagnostic method for repeat expansion diseases using nanopore sequencing. NPJ Genom Med. 2022; 7:62.
Article
20. Liu P, Erez A, Nagamani SC, Dhar SU, Kołodziejska KE, Dharmadhikari AV, et al. Chromosome catastrophes involve replication mechanisms generating complex genomic rearrangements. Cell. 2011; 146:889–903.
Article
21. Kloosterman WP, Guryev V, van Roosmalen M, Duran KJ, de Bruijn E, Bakker SC, et al. Chromothripsis as a mechanism driving complex de novo structural rearrangements in the germline. Hum Mol Genet. 2011; 20:1916–24.
Article
22. Hattori A, Fukami M. Established and novel mechanisms leading to de novo genomic rearrangements in the human germline. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2020; 160:167–76.
Article
23. Lei M, Liang D, Yang Y, Mitsuhashi S, Katoh K, Miyake N, et al. Long-read DNA sequencing fully characterized chromothripsis in a patient with Langer-Giedion syndrome and Cornelia de Lange syndrome-4. J Hum Genet. 2020; 65:667–74.
Article
24. Mantere T, Kersten S, Hoischen A. Long-read sequencing emerging in medical genetics. Front Genet. 2019; 10:426.
Article
25. Stephens Z, Milosevic D, Kipp B, Grebe S, Iyer RK, Kocher JA. PB-Motif-A method for identifying gene/pseudogene rearrangements with long reads: an application to CYP21A2 genotyping. Front Genet. 2021; 12:716586.
Article
26. Zhang R, Cui D, Song C, Ma X, Cai N, Zhang Y, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of a long-read sequencingbased approach in the clinical diagnosis of neonatal congenital adrenocortical hyperplasia. Clin Chim Acta. 2024; 555:117820.
Article
27. Adachi E, Nakagawa R, Tsuji-Hosokawa A, Gau M, Kirino S, Yogi A, et al. A MinION-based long-read sequencing application with one-step PCR for the genetic diagnosis of 21-hydroxylase deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024; 109:750–60.
Article
28. Soellner L, Begemann M, Mackay DJ, Grønskov K, Tümer Z, Maher ER, et al. Recent advances in imprinting disorders. Clin Genet. 2017; 91:3–13.
Article
29. Yamada M, Okuno H, Okamoto N, Suzuki H, Miya F, Takenouchi T, et al. Diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome by targeted nanopore long-read sequencing. Eur J Med Genet. 2023; 66:104690.
Article
Full Text Links
  • APEM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr