Clin Endosc.  2024 May;57(3):317-328. 10.5946/ce.2023.205.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • 3Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Orlando Gastroenterology PA, Orlando, FL, USA
  • 4Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
  • 5Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
  • 6Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
  • 7Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Abstract

Background/Aims
In this meta-analysis, we studied the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Methods
Multiple databases were searched, and studies were retrieved based on pre-specified criteria until October 2022. The outcomes assessed were resection rates, procedural complications, local recurrence, metachronous tumors, and the need for surgery after ESD in IBD. Standard meta-analysis methods were followed using the random-effects model, and I2% was used to assess heterogeneity.
Results
Twelve studies comprising 291 dysplastic lesions in 274 patients were included with a median follow-up of 25 months. The pooled en-bloc resection, R0 resection, and curative resection rates were 92.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.9%–95.4%; I2=0%), 81.5% (95% CI, 72.5%–88%; I2=43%), and 48.9% (95% CI, 32.1%–65.9%; I2=87%), respectively. The local recurrence rate was 3.9% (95% CI, 2%–7.5%; I2=0%). The pooled rates of bleeding and perforation were 7.7% (95% CI, 4.5%–13%; I2=10%) and 5.3% (95% CI, 3.1%–8.9%; I2=0%), respectively. The rates of metachronous recurrence and additional surgery following ESD were 10% (95% CI, 5.2%–18.2%; I2=55%) and 13% (95% CI, 8.5%–19.3%; I2=54%), respectively.
Conclusions
ESD is safe and effective for the resection of dysplastic lesions in IBD with an excellent pooled rate of en-bloc and R0 resection.

Keyword

Dysplasia; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Inflammatory bowel diseases

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Forest plot for en-bloc resection. IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; CI, confidence interval; UC, ulcerative colitis; CD, Crohn’s disease.

  • Fig. 2. Forest plot for R0 resection. IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; CI, confidence interval; UC, ulcerative colitis; CD, Crohn’s disease.

  • Fig. 3. Forest plot for curative resection. IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; CI, confidence interval; UC, ulcerative colitis; CD, Crohn’s disease.


Reference

1. Jess T, Simonsen J, Jørgensen KT, et al. Decreasing risk of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 30 years. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143:375–381.
Article
2. Eaden JA, Abrams KR, Mayberry JF. The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2001; 48:526–535.
Article
3. Choi CH, Rutter MD, Askari A, et al. Forty-year analysis of colonoscopic surveillance program for neoplasia in ulcerative colitis: an updated overview. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110:1022–1034.
Article
4. Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015; 47:829–854.
Article
5. Laine L, Kaltenbach T, Barkun A, et al. SCENIC international consensus statement on surveillance and management of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2015; 148:639–651.
Article
6. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Standards of Practice Committee, Shergill AK, Lightdale JR, et al. The role of endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81:1101–1121.
Article
7. Rutter MD, Riddell RH. Colorectal dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: a clinicopathologic perspective. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 12:359–367.
Article
8. Draganov PV, Wang AY, Othman MO, et al. AGA institute clinical practice update: endoscopic submucosal dissection in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 17:16–25.
Article
9. Uraoka T, Parra-Blanco A, Yahagi N. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan and Western countries. Dig Endosc. 2012; 24 Suppl 1:80–83.
Article
10. Hurlstone DP, Sanders DS, Atkinson R, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for flat neoplasia in chronic ulcerative colitis: can we change the endoscopic management paradigm? Gut. 2007; 56:838–846.
Article
11. Wang J, Zhang XH, Ge J, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:8282–8287.
Article
12. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021; 10:89.
Article
13. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000; 283:2008–2012.
Article
14. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010; 25:603–605.
Article
15. Iacopini F, Saito Y, Yamada M, et al. Curative endoscopic submucosal dissection of large nonpolypoid superficial neoplasms in ulcerative colitis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82:734–738.
Article
16. Kasuga K, Yamada M, Shida D, et al. Treatment outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for colorectal neoplasms in patients with ulcerative colitis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2021; 9:964–972.
Article
17. Kochhar G, Steele S, Sanaka M, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat colonic polyps in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a single-center experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018; 24:e14–e15.
Article
18. Kinoshita S, Nishizawa T, Yahagi N, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with ulcerative colitis. Digestion. 2019; 99:27–32.
Article
19. Lightner AL, Vaidya P, Allende D, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is safe and feasible, allowing for ongoing surveillance and organ preservation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23:2100–2107.
Article
20. Matsumoto K, Oka S, Tanaka S, et al. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for ulcerative colitis-associated dysplasia. Digestion. 2021; 102:205–215.
Article
21. Manta R, Zullo A, Telesca DA, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for visible dysplasia treatment in ulcerative colitis patients: cases series and systematic review of literature. J Crohns Colitis. 2021; 15:165–168.
Article
22. Matsui A, Hoteya S, Hayasaka J, et al. Real-world experience of endoscopic submucosal dissection for ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasia. Inflamm Intest Dis. 2021; 6:70–77.
Article
23. Ngamruengphong S, Aihara H, Friedland S, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: a US multicenter study. Endosc Int Open. 2022; 10:E354–E360.
Article
24. Nishio M, Hirasawa K, Ozeki Y, et al. An endoscopic treatment strategy for superficial tumors in patients with ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 36:498–506.
Article
25. Suzuki N, Toyonaga T, East JE. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colitis-related dysplasia. Endoscopy. 2017; 49:1237–1242.
Article
26. Yang DH, Kim J, Song EM, et al. Outcomes of ulcerative colitis-associated dysplasia patients referred for potential endoscopic submucosal dissection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 34:1581–1589.
Article
27. Puhan MA, Schünemann HJ, Murad MH, et al. A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014; 349:g5630.
Article
28. Alkandari A, Thayalasekaran S, Bhandari M, et al. Endoscopic re­sections in inflammatory bowel disease: a multicentre European outcomes study. J Crohns Colitis. 2019; 13:1394–1400.
Article
29. Yadav S, Loftus EV Jr, Harmsen WS, et al. Outcome of endoscopic resection of colonic polyps larger than 10 mm in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Endosc Int Open. 2019; 7:E994–E1001.
Article
30. Yu JX, Lin JL, Oliver M, et al. Trends in EMR for nonmalignant colorectal polyps in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 91:124–131.
Article
31. Akintoye E, Kumar N, Aihara H, et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2016; 4:E1030–E1044.
Article
32. Patel N, Patel K, Ashrafian H, et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: systematic review of mid-term clinical outcomes. Dig Endosc. 2016; 28:405–416.
Article
33. Mohapatra S, Sankaramangalam K, Lopimpisuth C, et al. Advanced endoscopic resection for colorectal dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2022; 10:E593–E601.
Article
34. Chen W, Zhang YL, Zhao Y, et al. Endoscopic resection for non-polypoid dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2021; 35:1534–1543.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr