Ann Clin Microbiol.  2023 Dec;26(4):125-137. 10.5145/ACM.2023.26.4.125.

Performance evaluation of 4-day versus 5-day blood cultures using the BD BACTEC FX system

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
Blood culture (BC) systems have evolved to increase sensitivity and reduce turnaround times. This study compared the performance of a 4-day versus a 5-day BC incubation period using the BD BACTEC™ FX (Becton, Dickinson and Company, USA).
Methods
A total of 37,379 consecutive sets of BC were evaluated over a 3-month period in a 2,700-bed tertiary care hospital. Positive BC results were reviewed to assess time-to-positivity (TTP) and species identification of the isolates. The BCs were performed in pairs of vials, utilizing either BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F or Peds Plus/F with BD BACTEC Lytic Anaerobic media.
Results
A total of 14,899 episodes, averaging 2.51 sets per episode, were analyzed. Of these, 1,398 (9.38%) were positive, yielding 1,465 isolates. TTP (hours) were < 12 in 48.87%, 12-24 in 31.40%, 24-48 in 13.38%, 48-72 in 3.28%, 72-96 in 1.43%, and >96 in 1.64%. The two most prevalent organisms, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. were detected within 12 hours in 88.75% and 78.90%, respectively. The respective median TTP (T50) values for E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterococcus faecalis/E. faecium, and Staphylococcus aureus were 9.24, 9.60, 13.75, and 14.20. T50 values for these species were significantly shorter in anaerobic bottles than in aerobic bottles. Of 24 BCs with TTP > 96, only 4 containing anaerobic bacteria or molds were first detected after 96 hours.
Conclusion
A 4-day incubation has demonstrated excellent sensitivity. However, a 5-day incubation may be beneficial for hospitals caring for patients at high risk for infections with slow-growing fungi or fastidious bacteria.

Keyword

Anaerobic bacteria; Blood culture; Fungi; Incubation; Times to positivity

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Cumulative percentages of positive blood cultures according to time-to-positivity.

  • Fig. 2. Number of isolates by time to positivity in aerobic and anaerobic bottles. The white, black, and gray arrow head denoted T50 of aerobic bottles, anaerobic bottles, both bottles, respectively. T50, median time-to-positivity.

  • Fig. 3. The time to positivity (TTP) of aerobic and anaerobic bottles among six most frequent organisms. Each of the white and black arrow heads denoted T50 of aerobic bottles and anaerobic bottles, respectively. The TTP for P. aeruginosa displayed only for aerobic bottles. CNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; T50, median time-to-positivity.


Reference

1. Goto M, Al-Hasan MN. Overall burden of bloodstream infection and nosocomial bloodstream infection in North America and Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19:501-9. .
2. Pien BC, Sundaram P, Raoof N, Costa SF, Mirrett S, Woods CW, et al. The clinical and prognostic importance of positive blood cultures in adults. Am J Med 2010;123:819-28. .
3. Hardy DJ, Hulbert BB, Migneault PC. Time to detection of positive BacT/Alert blood cultures and lack of need for routine subculture of 5- to 7-day negative cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:2743-5. .
4. Seo EJ and Pai CH. BACTEC NR-730 blood culture. Korean J Clin Pathol 1993;13:601-6. .
5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Principles and procedures for blood cultures. 2nd ed. CLSI guideline M47. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2022. .
6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Principle and procedures for blood cultures; approved guideline. CLSI document M47-A. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2007. .
7. Sung H, Kim MN, Pai CH. The clinical relevance of four-day blood cultures with the BACTEC 9240 system. Korean J Clin Pathol 2001:193-8. .
8. Ransom EM, Alipour Z, Wallace MA, Burnham CA. Evaluation of optimal blood culture incubation time to maximize clinically relevant results from a contemporary blood culture instrument and media system. J Clin Microbiol 2021;59:e02459-20. .
9. Doern GV, Brueggemann AB, Dunne WM, Jenkins SG, Halstead DC, McLaughlin JC. Fourday incubation period for blood culture bottles processed with the Difco ESP blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:1290-2. .
10. Bourbeau PP and Pohlman JK. Three days of incubation may be sufficient for routine blood cultures with BacT/Alert FAN blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:2079-82. .
11. Park SH, Shim H, Yoon NS, Kim MN. Clinical relevance of time-to-positivity in BACTEC9240 blood culture system. Korean J Lab Med 2010;30:276-83. .
12. Pardo J, Klinker KP, Borgert SJ, Trikha G, Rand KH, Ramphal R. Time to positivity of blood cultures supports antibiotic de-escalation at 48 hours. Ann Pharmacother 2014;48:33-40. .
13. Barenfanger J, Graham DR, Kolluri L, Sangwan G, Lawhorn J, Drake CA, et al. Decreased mortality associated with prompt Gram staining of blood cultures. Am J Clin Pathol 2008;130:870-6. .
14. López-Pintor JM, Sánchez-López J, Navarro-San Francisco C, Sánchez-Díaz AM, Loza E, Cantón R. Real life clinical impact of antimicrobial stewardship actions on the blood culture workflow from a microbiology laboratory. Antibiotics 2021;10:1511. .
15. Park HJ, Na S, Park SY, Moon SM, Cho OH, Park KH, et al. Clinical significance of Propionibacterium acnes recovered from blood cultures: analysis of 524 episodes. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:1598-601. .
16. Tusgul S, Prod'hom G, Senn L, Meuli R, Bochud PY, Giulieri SG. Bacillus cereus bacteraemia: comparison between haematologic and nonhaematologic patients. New Microbes New Infect 2017;15:65-71. .
17. Song SA, Kim JH, Shin JH, Kim SH, Lee NY, Kim MN, et al. Clinical usefulness of routine use of anaerobic blood culture bottle. Ann Clin Microbiol 2014;17:35-41. .
18. Ransom EM and Burnham CA. Routine use of anaerobic blood culture bottles for specimens collected from adults and children enhances microorganism recovery and improves time to positivity. J Clin Microbiol 2022;60:e00500-22. .
19. Viganò EF, Vasconi E, Agrappi C, Clerici P. Use of simulated blood cultures for time to detection comparison between BacT/ALERT™ and BACTEC™ 9240 blood culture systems. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;44:235-40. .
20. Cobos-Trigueros N, Zboromyrska Y, Morata L, Alejo-Cancho I, Calle CD, Vergara Gómez A, et al. Time-to-positivity, type of culture media and oxidase test performed on positive blood culture vials to predict Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with Gram-negative bacilli bacteraemia. Rev Esp Quimioter 2017;30:9-13. .
21. Klaerner HG, Eschenbach U, Kamereck K, Lehn N, Wagner H, Miethke T. Failure of an automated blood culture system to detect nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:1036-41. .
22. Aloush V, Navon-Venezia S, Seigman-Igra Y, Cabili S, Carmeli Y. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: risk factors and clinical impact. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006;50:43-8. .
23. Lee JY, Hong JH, Lee M. Comparison of BACTEC Plus aerobic/F media and BacT/Alert FA media to detect bacteria in blood culture bottles containing peak therapeutic levels of antimicrobials. Korean J Clin Microbiol 2010;13:151-6. .
24. Doern GV. Detection of selected fastidious bacteria. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:166-73. .
25. Reisner BS and Woods GL. Times to detection of bacteria and yeasts in BACTEC 9240 blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:2024-6. .
26. Baron EJ, Scott JD, Tompkins LS. Prolonged incubation and extensive subculturing do not increase recovery of clinically significant microorganisms from standard automated blood cultures. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:1677-80. .
27. Petti CA, Bhally HS, Weinstein MP, Joho K, Wakefield T, Reller LB, et al. Utility of extended blood culture incubation for isolation of Haemophilus, Actinobacillus, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, and Kingella organisms: a retrospective multicenter evaluation. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:257-9. .
28. Weinstein MP. Emerging data indicating that extended incubation of blood cultures has little clinical value. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:1681-2.
Full Text Links
  • ACM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr