Korean J Pain.  2024 Jan;37(1):59-72. 10.3344/kjp.23268.

Postoperative analgesic effects of the quadratus lumborum block in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 2Department of Radiology, The Armed Forces Daejeon Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
  • 3Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicines, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
This study assessed the postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in pediatric patients.
Methods
Electronic databases were searched for studies comparing the QLB to conventional analgesic techniques in pediatric patients. The primary outcome was the need for rescue analgesia 12 and 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes covered the Face-Legs-Activity-Cry-Consolability Scale (FLACC) scores at various time points; parental satisfaction; time to the first rescue analgesia; hospitalization time; block execution time; block failure rates, and adverse events.
Results
Sixteen randomized controlled trials were analyzed involving 1,061 patients. The QLB significantly reduced the need for rescue analgesia both at 12 and 24 hours after surgery (12 hours, relative risk [RR]: 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01, 0.88; 24 hours, RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.70). In case of 24 hours after surgery, type 1 QLB significantly reduced the need for rescue analgesia (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.76). The QLB also exhibited lower FLACC scores at 1 hour (standardized mean difference [SMD]: –0.87; 95% CI: –1.56, –0.18) and 6 hours (SMD: 1.27; 95% CI: –2.33, –0.21) following surgery when compared to non-QLB. Among QLBs, type 2 QLB significantly extended the time until the first rescue analgesia (SMD: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.67). No significant differences were observed in terms of parental satisfaction, hospitalization time, block execution time, block failure, or adverse events between QLB and non-QLB groups.
Conclusions
The QLB provides non-inferior analgesic efficacy and safety to conventional methods in pediatric patients.

Keyword

Analgesia; Meta-Analysis; Nerve Block; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pain; Postoperative; Pediatrics; Systematic Review

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses flow diagram of study selection. A total of 302 articles were identified through searches of the electronic databases. After excluding 124 duplicate studies, 156 articles were removed from the article pool based on the fitness of the title and abstract. The full texts of 22 eligible studies were then reviewed, and six studies were excluded. Finally, 16 RCTs were included in the final analysis. RCT: randomized controlled trial, QLB: quadratus lumborum block, TFB: transversalis fascia block.

  • Fig. 2 Forest plots for the number of patients needing rescue analgesia (A) 12 hr and (B) 24 hr after surgery. QLB reduced the need for rescue analgesia at both 12 hr (P value < 0.001) and 24 hr (P value < 0.001, Egger’s P value = 0.506) after surgery. QLB: quadratus lumborum block, TFB: transversalis fascia block, IO: intravenous opioid, TAP: transversus abdominis plane block, II/IH: ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block, ESPB: erector spinae plane block, CB: caudal block, II: incision line injection, CI: confidence interval, FE: fixed effects, RE: random effects. aDifferent study by the same author published at a different year (patient enrollment periods do not overlap).

  • Fig. 3 Forest plots for the number of patients needing rescue analgesia 24 hr after surgery depending on the type of QLB: (A) type 1 QLB; (B) type 2 QLB; and (C) type 3 QLB. Type 1 QLB reduced the need for rescue analgesia at 24 hr post-surgery (P value < 0.001), but type 2 QLB and type 3 QLB showed no difference in the need for rescue analgesia compared on non-QLB (P value = 0.071 and P value =0.243, respectively). QLB: quadratus lumborum block, IO, intravenous opioid, TAP: transversus abdominis plane block, CB: caudal block, ESPB: erector spinae plane block, II/IH: ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block, II: incision line injection, CI: confidence interval, RE: random effects, FE: fixed effects. aDifferent study by the same author published at a different year (patient enrollment periods do not overlap).

  • Fig. 4 Forest plots for (A) parental satisfaction score; (B) time to first rescue analgesia; and (C) total hospitalization time between the QLB and non-QLB groups. Parental satisfaction score did not differ between QLB and non-QLB (P = 0.360). There was a weak association between QLB and extended time to first rescue analgesia (P = 0.049). No difference in total hospitalization time was observed between the two groups (P = 0.547). QLB: quadratus lumborum block, SD: standard deviation, SMD: standardized mean difference, CI: confidence interval, ESPB: erector spinae plane block, CB: caudal block, TFB: transversalis fascia block, TAP: transversus abdominis plane block, IO: intravenous opioid, II/IH: ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block.


Reference

1. Groenewald CB, Rabbitts JA, Schroeder DR, Harrison TE. 2012; Prevalence of moderate-severe pain in hospitalized children. Paediatr Anaesth. 22:661–8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03807.x. PMID: 22332912.
2. Rove KO, Edney JC, Brockel MA. 2018; Enhanced recovery after surgery in children: promising, evidence-based multidisciplinary care. Paediatr Anaesth. 28:482–92. DOI: 10.1111/pan.13380. PMID: 29752858.
3. Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. 2012; Good practice in postoperative and procedural pain management, 2nd edition. Paediatr Anaesth. 22 Suppl 1:1–79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03838.x.
4. Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C. 2007; Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 35:616–7. DOI: 10.26226/morressier.5b519f6ab1b87b000ecf1822. PMID: 18020088.
5. Blanco R. 2007; 271. Tap block under ultrasound guidance: the description of a "no pops" technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 32:130. DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.06.268.
6. Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Barrington M. 2019; Quadratus lumborum block: anatomical concepts, mechanisms, and techniques. Anesthesiology. 130:322–35. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002524. PMID: 30688787.
7. Jin Z, Liu J, Li R, Gan TJ, He Y, Lin J. 2020; Single injection Quadratus Lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in adult surgical population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 62:109715. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109715. PMID: 31968297.
8. Liu X, Song T, Chen X, Zhang J, Shan C, Chang L, et al. 2020; Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 20:53. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-00967-2. PMID: 32122319. PMCID: PMC7053127. PMID: 3928122383fa410a84baebf64deab23e.
9. Xu M, Tang Y, Wang J, Yang J. 2020; Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth. 42:87–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.02.005. PMID: 32173221.
10. Zhao WL, Li SD, Wu B, Zhou ZF. 2021; Quadratus lumborum block is an effective postoperative analgesic technique in pediatric patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis. Pain Physician. 24:E555–63. DOI: 10.36076/ppj.2024.24.E555. PMID: 34323442.
11. Huang C, Zhang X, Dong C, Lian C, Li J, Yu L. 2021; Postoperative analgesic effects of the quadratus lumborum block III and transversalis fascia plane block in paediatric patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip undergoing open reduction surgeries: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 11:e038992. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038992. PMID: 33542037. PMCID: PMC7925863.
12. Oral Ahiskalioglu E, Ahiskalioglu A, Selvitopi K, Peksoz U, Aydin ME, Ates I, et al. 2021; Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block in congenital hip dislocation surgery: a randomized controlled study. Anaesthesist. 70(Suppl 1):53–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00101-021-00913-y. PMID: 33507315.
13. Alansary AM, Badawy A, Elbeialy MAK. 2023; Ultrasound-guided trans-incisional quadratus lumborum block versus ultrasound-guided caudal analgesia in pediatric open renal surgery: a randomized trial. Korean J Anesthesiol. 76:471–80. DOI: 10.4097/kja.22774. PMID: 36704815. PMCID: PMC10562062. PMID: ea89a31f98954c76b75f43b56fbaac97.
14. Koster G, Wetterslev J, Gluud C, Zijlstra JG, Scheeren TW, van der Horst IC, et al. 2015; Effects of levosimendan for low cardiac output syndrome in critically ill patients: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Intensive Care Med. 41:203–21. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3604-1. PMID: 25518953.
15. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. Alonso-Coello P; GRADE Working Group. 2008; GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 336:924–6. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. PMID: 18436948. PMCID: PMC2335261.
16. Furukawa TA, Barbui C, Cipriani A, Brambilla P, Watanabe N. 2006; Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results. J Clin Epidemiol. 59:7–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.06.006. PMID: 16360555.
17. IntHout J, Ioannidis JP, Borm GF. 2014; The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol. 14:25. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-25. PMID: 24548571. PMCID: PMC4015721.
18. Abdelbaser I, Salah DM, Ateyya AA, Abdo MI. 2023; Ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block versus lateral quadratus lumborum plane block for analgesia after inguinal herniotomy in children: a randomized controlled non-inferiority study. BMC Anesthesiol. 23:82. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02043-x. PMID: 36932317. PMCID: PMC10022034. PMID: 573fab4fc5c14edc84613bed5d53b077.
19. Aksu C, Şen MC, Akay MA, Baydemir C, Gürkan Y. 2019; Erector spinae plane block vs quadratus lumborum block for pediatric lower abdominal surgery: a double blinded, prospective, and randomized trial. J Clin Anesth. 57:24–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.03.006. PMID: 30851499.
20. Genç Moralar D, Tok Cekmecelioglu B, Aslan M, Hergünsel GO. 2020; Effect of quadratus lumborum block on postoperative analgesic requirements in pediatric patients: a randomized controlled double-blinded study. Minerva Anestesiol. 86:150–6. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13361-5. PMID: 31808656.
21. Ashoor TM, Zain EM, Reyad MK, Hasseb AM, Esmat IM. 2023; Ultrasound-guided techniques for perioperative analgesia in pediatric lower abdominal surgeries: quadratus lumborum block with bupivacaine versus caudal bupivacaine and neostigmine. Pain Physician. 26:137–47. PMID: 36988360.
22. İpek CB, Kara D, Yılmaz S, Yeşiltaş S, Esen A, Dooply SSSL, et al. 2019; Comparison of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block, quadratus lumborum block, and caudal epidural block for perioperative analgesia in pediatric lower abdominal surgery. Turk J Med Sci. 49:1395–402. DOI: 10.3906/sag-1812-59. PMID: 31648515. PMCID: PMC7018333.
23. Öksüz G, Arslan M, Urfalıoğlu A, Güler AG, Tekşen Ş, Bilal B, et al. 2020; Comparison of quadratus lumborum block and caudal block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair and orchiopexy surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 45:187–91. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101027. PMID: 31907294.
24. Öksüz G, Bilal B, Gürkan Y, Urfalioğlu A, Arslan M, Gişi G, et al. 2017; Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block in children undergoing low abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 42:674–9. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000645. PMID: 28759502.
25. Priyadarshini K, Behera BK, Tripathy BB, Misra S. 2022; Ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block, ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block, and quadratus lumborum block for elective open inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 47:217–21. Erratum in: Reg Anesth Pain Med 2022; 47: e2. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103201. PMID: 35039439.
26. Ragab SG, El Gohary MM, Abd El Baky DL, Nawwar KMA. 2022; Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block versus caudal block for pain relief in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries: a randomized, double-blind comparative study. Anesth Pain Med. 12:e126602. DOI: 10.5812/aapm-126602. PMID: 36937088. PMCID: PMC10016135.
27. Samerchua A, Leurcharusmee P, Panichpichate K, Bunchungmongkol N, Wanvoharn M, Tepmalai K, et al. 2020; A prospective, randomized comparative study between ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block and ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block for pediatric inguinal herniotomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 30:498–505. DOI: 10.1111/pan.13837. PMID: 32030845.
28. Taman H, Saber HIES, Farid AM, Elawady MM. 2022; Bilateral erector spinae plane block vs quadratus lumborum block for pediatric postoperative pain management after laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a double blinded randomized study. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. 26:602–7. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i5.2017.
29. Zhang Y, Wang YP, Wang HT, Xu YC, Lv HM, Yu Y, et al. 2022; Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block provided more effective analgesia for children undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 36:9046–53. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09370-z. PMID: 35764836.
30. Sato M. 2019; Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block compared to caudal ropivacaine/morphine in children undergoing surgery for vesicoureteric reflex. Paediatr Anaesth. 29:738–43. DOI: 10.1111/pan.13650. PMID: 31034730.
31. Wiegele M, Marhofer P, Lönnqvist PA. 2019; Caudal epidural blocks in paediatric patients: a review and practical considerations. Br J Anaesth. 122:509–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.030. PMID: 30857607. PMCID: PMC6435837.
32. Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Kolli S, Esa WAS, DeGrande S, Soliman LM, et al. 2017; Injectate spread following anterior sub-costal and posterior approaches to the quadratus lumborum block: a comparative cadaveric study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 34:587–95. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000680. PMID: 28731927.
33. Carline L, McLeod GA, Lamb C. 2016; A cadaver study comparing spread of dye and nerve involvement after three different quadratus lumborum blocks. Br J Anaesth. 117:387–94. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew224. PMID: 27543534.
34. Børglum J, Moriggl B, Jensen K, Lønnqvist PA, Christensen AF, Sauter A, et al. 2013; Ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum blockade. Br J Anaesth. 111:DOI: 10.1093/bja/el_9919.
35. Blanco R, Ansari T, Girgis E. 2015; Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 32:812–8. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000299. PMID: 26225500.
36. Mannion S, Barrett J, Kelly D, Murphy DB, Shorten GD. 2005; A description of the spread of injectate after psoas compartment block using magnetic resonance imaging. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 30:567–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.08.004. PMID: 16326342.
37. Tamura T, Yokota S, Ito S, Shibata Y, Nishiwaki K. 2019; Local anesthetic spread into the paravertebral space with two types of quadratus lumborum blocks: a crossover volunteer study. J Anesth. 33:26–32. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-018-2578-5. PMID: 30413879.
38. Wikner M. 2017; Unexpected motor weakness following quadratus lumborum block for gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesthesia. 72:230–2. DOI: 10.1111/anae.13754. PMID: 27891579.
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr