Anesth Pain Med.  2023 Jul;18(3):315-324. 10.17085/apm.23013.

Removing knotted or stuck epidural catheters: a systematic review of case reports

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Nepal Mediciti, Lalitpur, Nepal

Abstract

Background
The knotting or in vivo entrapment of epidural catheters is an uncommon but challenging issue for anesthesiologists. This study aimed to identify the possible causes behind entrapped epidural catheters and the effective methods for their removal.
Methods
A systematic review of relevant case reports and series was conducted using the patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcome framework and keywords such as “epidural,” “catheter,” “knotting,” “stuck,” “entrapped,” and “entrapment.” The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was followed, and the review protocol was registered with International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (CRD42021291266).
Results
The analysis included 59 cases with a mean depth of catheter insertion from the skin of 11.825 cm and an average duration of 8.17 h for the detection of non-functioning catheters. In 27 cases (45.8%), a radiological knot was found, with an average length of 2.59 cm from the tip. The chi-squared test revealed a significant difference between the initial and final positions of catheter insertion (P = 0.049).
Conclusions
Deep insertion was the primary cause of epidural catheter entrapment. To remove the entrapped catheters, the lateral decubitus position should be attempted first, followed by the position used during insertion. Based on these findings, recommendations for the prevention and removal of entrapped catheters have been formulated.

Keyword

Catheter; Device removal; Entrapment; Epidural anesthesia; Pain management; Patient positioning

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Flowchart of publications selected/rejected for the systematic review study.


Reference

1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2700.
2. Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, et al. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 69:225–34.
Article
3. Chang PY, Hu J, Lin YT, Chan KH, Tsou MY. Butterfly-like knotting of a lumbar epidural catheter. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2010; 48:45–8.
Article
4. Macfarlane J, Paech MJ. Another knotted epidural catheter. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2002; 30:240–3.
Article
5. Browne RA, Politi VL. Knotting of an epidural catheter: a case report. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1979; 26:142–4.
Article
6. Holladay J, Sage K. Epidural catheter. StatPearls [Internet]. 2022 Jun 11 [(updated 2023 Jan) cited 2023 Apr 24]. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559115/.
7. Molina-García RA, Muñoz-Martínez AC, Hoyos-Pescador R, De la Torre-Espinosa R. Retained epidural catheter: a rare complication: report of two cases. Colomb J Anesthesiol. 2017; 45 Suppl 1:4–7.
Article
8. Muneyuki M, Shirai K, Inamoto A. Roentgenographic analysis of the positions of catheters in the epidural space. Anesthesiology. 1970; 33:19–24.
Article
9. Mizota T, Kimura K, Takeda C. Knot formation in a thoracic epidural catheter: a case report. JA Clin Rep. 2021; 7:45.
Article
10. Bougher RJ, Corbett AR, Ramage DT. The effect of tunnelling on epidural catheter migration. Anaesthesia. 1996; 51:191–4.
Article
11. Lim YJ, Bahk JH, Ahn WS, Lee SC. Coiling of lumbar epidural catheters. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002; 46:603–6.
Article
12. Brichant JF, Bonhomme V, Hans P. On knots in epidural catheters: a case report and a review of the literature. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006; 15:159–62.
Article
13. Blomberg RG. Technical advantages of the paramedian approach for lumbar epidural puncture and catheter introduction. A study using epiduroscopy in autopsy subjects. Anaesthesia. 1988; 43:837–43.
Article
14. Morris G, Warren B, Hanson E, Mazzeo F, DiBenedetto D. Influence of patient position on withdrawal forces during removal of lumbar extradural catheters. Br J Anaesth. 1996; 77:419–20.
Article
15. Lala PS, Langar V, Rai A, Singh R. A rare complication of epidural anaesthesia a case report with brief review of literature. Indian J Anaesth. 2011; 55:629–30.
Article
16. Collier CB. Why obstetric epidurals fail: a study of epidurograms. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1996; 5:19–31.
Article
17. Hajnour MS, Khokhar RS, Ejaz AA, Al Zahrani T, Kanchi NU. Difficulty in the removal of epidural catheter for labor analgesia. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017; 11:117–9.
Article
18. Blackshear RH, Gravenstein N, Radson E. Tension applied to lumbar epidural catheters during removal is much greater with patient sitting versus lying. Anesthesiology. 1991; 75:A833.
Article
19. Boey SK, Carrie LE. Withdrawal forces during removal of lumbar extradural catheters. Br J Anaesth. 1994; 73:833–5.
Article
20. Asai T, Yamamoto K, Hirose T, Taguchi H, Shingu K. Breakage of epidural catheters: a comparison of an arrow reinforced catheter and other nonreinforced catheters. Anesth Analg. 2001; 92:246–8.
Article
21. Blum SL, Sosis MB. A comparison of the tensile strengths of six types of 20 gauge epidural catheters. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1996; 21(Suppl 2):81.
22. Mcgregor PJ. Knotting of the Theracath™ after an Uneventful Epidural Insertion for Cesarean Delivery. Anesthesiology. 1990; 73:1293.
Article
23. Jongleux EF, Miller R, Freeman A. An entrapped epidural catheter in a postpartum patient. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998; 23:615–7.
24. Brenier G, Salces A, Maguès JP, Fuzier R. Peripheral nerve catheter entrapment is not always related to knotting. Can J Anaesth. 2010; 57:183–4.
Article
25. Mitra R, Fleischmann K. Management of the sheared epidural catheter: is surgical extraction really necessary? J Clin Anesth. 2007; 19:310–4.
Article
26. Bréget JM, Fischer C, Ben Meftah R, Tabary N. [Impossible withdrawal of an epidural catheter]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008; 27:1016–8. French.
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr