J Korean Med Sci.  2023 Sep;38(37):e291. 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e291.

Conducting and Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research

• Barroga E
• Matanguihan GJ
• Furuta A
• Arima M
• Tsuchiya S
• Kawahara C
• Takamiya Y
• Izumi M

• KMID: 2546201
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e291

Abstract

Comprehensive knowledge of quantitative and qualitative research systematizes scholarly research and enhances the quality of research output. Scientific researchers must be familiar with them and skilled to conduct their investigation within the frames of their chosen research type. When conducting quantitative research, scientific researchers should describe an existing theory, generate a hypothesis from the theory, test their hypothesis in novel research, and re-evaluate the theory. Thereafter, they should take a deductive approach in writing the testing of the established theory based on experiments. When conducting qualitative research, scientific researchers raise a question, answer the question by performing a novel study, and propose a new theory to clarify and interpret the obtained results. After which, they should take an inductive approach to writing the formulation of concepts based on collected data. When scientific researchers combine the whole spectrum of inductive and deductive research approaches using both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies, they apply mixed-method research. Familiarity and proficiency with these research aspects facilitate the construction of novel hypotheses, development of theories, or refinement of concepts.

Keyword

Deductive Reasoning; Inductive Reasoning; Qualitative Research; Quantitative Research; Study design

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Schematic diagrams of qualitative and quantitative research methodologies.

Reference

1. Developing a hypothesis. Updated 2023. Accessed March 5, 2023. https://opentext.wsu.edu/carriecuttler/chapter/developing-a-hypothesis/ .

2. Chigbu UE. Visually hypothesising in scientific paper writing: Confirming and refuting qualitative research hypotheses using diagrams. Publications. 2019; 7(1):22.

3. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Mukanova U, Yessirkepov M, Kitas GD. Scientific hypotheses: writing, promoting, and predicting implications. J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34(45):e300. PMID: 31760713.

4. Young M, Varpio L, Uijtdehaage S, Paradis E. The spectrum of inductive and deductive research approaches using quantitative and qualitative data. Acad Med. 2020; 95(7):1122. PMID: 31833855.

5. Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ. Correcting language mistakes in qualitative research articles. Cent Asian J Med Hypotheses Ethics. 2020; 1(2):146–151.

6. De Carlo M. Scientific inquiry in social work: Inductive and deductive reasoning (Pressbooks). Updated 2023. Accessed March 6, 2023. https://scientificinquiryinsocialwork.pressbooks.com/chapter/6-3-inductive-and-deductive-reasoning/ .

7. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2011; 31(11):1409–1417. PMID: 21800117.

8. Hong ST. Ten tips for authors of scientific articles. J Korean Med Sci. 2014; 29(8):1035–1037. PMID: 25120310.

9. Gu X, Xu Z. Sustainable development of EFL learners’ research writing competence and their identity construction: Chinese novice writer-researchers’ metadiscourse use in English research articles. Sustainability (Basel). 2021; 13(17):9523.

10. Elnathan R. English is the language of science - but precision is tough as a non-native speaker. Nature. Forthcoming. 2021; DOI: . DOI: 10.1038/d41586-021-00899-y.

11. Yakhontova T. English writing of non-Anglophone researchers. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(26):e216. PMID: 32627440.

12. Shpit EI, McCarthy PM. Addressing discourse differences in the writing of Russian engineering students and international researchers. Lang Teach Res. Forthcoming. 2022; DOI: . DOI: 10.1177/13621688221109809.

13. Aspers P, Corte U. What is qualitative in qualitative research? Qual Sociol. 2019; 42(2):139–160. PMID: 31105362.

14. Munthe-Kaas HM, Glenton C, Booth A, Noyes J, Lewin S. Systematic mapping of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: first stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19(1):113. PMID: 31164084.

15. Noyes J, Booth A, Moore G, Flemming K, Tunçalp Ö, Shakibazadeh E. Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods. BMJ Glob Health. 2019; 4(Suppl 1):e000893.

16. Ryba TV, Wiltshire G, North J, Ronkainen NJ. Developing mixed methods research in sport and exercise psychology: potential contributions of a critical realist perspective. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2022; 20(1):147–167.

17. Das AK, Datta B. Open science in addressing responsible research and innovation: Evidence from India and other countries. J Scientometr Res. 2020; 9(2s):s14–s23.

18. Christensen MV, Nieminen M, Altenhofer M, Tancoigne E, Mejlgaard N, Griessler E, et al. What’s in a name? Perceptions and promotion of responsible research and innovation practices across Europe. Sci Public Policy. 2020; 47(3):360–370.

19. Resnik DB. International standards for research integrity: An idea whose time has come? Account Res. 2009; 16(4):218–228. PMID: 20183162.

20. Cutri J, Freya A, Karlina Y, Patel SV, Moharami M, Zeng S, et al. Academic integrity at doctoral level: the influence of the imposter phenomenon and cultural differences on academic writing. IJEI. 2021; 17(1):8.

21. Types of research within qualitative and quantitative. Updated 2023. Accessed March 6, 2023. https://libguides.rutgers.edu/c.php?g=337288&p=2273209 .

22. Misra DP, Gasparyan AY, Zimba O, Yessirkepov M, Agarwal V, Kitas GD. Formulating hypotheses for different study designs. J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36(50):e338. PMID: 34962112.

23. Tenny S, Brannan JM, Brannan GD. Qualitative Study. StatPearls. Updated 2023. Accessed April 15, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/?report=printable .

24. Borgstede M, Scholz M. Quantitative and qualitative Approaches to generalization and replication: a representationalist view. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:605191. PMID: 33613387.

25. Das MK. An Introduction to qualitative and mixed methods study designs in Health. Indian Pediatr. 2022; 59(5):416–423. PMID: 34338218.

26. Bhangu S, Provost F, Caduff C. Introduction to qualitative research methods - Part I. Perspect Clin Res. 2023; 14(1):39–42. PMID: 36909216.

27. Chai HH, Gao SS, Chen KJ, Duangthip D, Lo EC, Chu CH. A concise review on qualitative research in dentistry. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(3):942. PMID: 33499023.

28. Baghlaf K. Necessity and relevance of qualitative research in pediatric dentistry. A literature review. Saudi Dent J. 2023; 35(1):31–38. PMID: 36817030.

29. Busetto L, Wick W, Gumbinger C. How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurol Res Pract. 2020; 2(1):14. PMID: 33324920.

30. Finn GM, Dueñas AN, Kehoe A, Brown ME. A novice’s guide to qualitative health professions education research. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022; 47(12):2090–2095. PMID: 35978555.

31. Östlund AS, Kristofferzon ML, Häggström E, Wadensten B. Primary care nurses’ performance in motivational interviewing: a quantitative descriptive study. BMC Fam Pract. 2015; 16(1):89. PMID: 26205692.

32. Díaz-García O, Herranz Aguayo I, Fernández de Castro P, Ramos JL. Lifestyles of Spanish elders from supervened SARS-CoV-2 variant onwards: A correlational research on life satisfaction and social-relational praxes. Front Psychol. 2022; 13:948745. PMID: 36248522.

33. Sharma MK, Adhikari R. Effect of school water, sanitation, and hygiene on health status among basic level students in Nepal. Environ Health Insights. 2022; 16:11786302221095030. PMID: 35495174.

34. Tuna F, Tunçer B, Can HB, Süt N, Tuna H. Immediate effect of Kinesio taping® on deep cervical flexor endurance: a non-controlled, quasi-experimental pre-post quantitative study. Cranio. 2022; 40(6):528–535. PMID: 32883188.

35. Hyun C, Kim K, Lee S, Lee HH, Lee J. Quantitative evaluation of the consciousness level of patients in a vegetative state using virtual reality and an eye-tracking system: a single-case experimental design study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022; 32(10):2628–2645. PMID: 34486951.

36. Silva Lima R, Silva MA, de Andrade LS, Mello MA, Goncalves MF. Construction of professional identity in nursing students: qualitative research from the historical-cultural perspective. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020; 28:e3284. PMID: 32520240.

37. Gammeltoft TM, Huyền Diệu BT, Kim Dung VT, Đức Anh V, Minh Hiếu L, Thị Ái N. Existential vulnerability: an ethnographic study of everyday lives with diabetes in Vietnam. Anthropol Med. 2022; 29(3):271–288. PMID: 34844468.

38. Oeljeklaus L, Schmid HL, Kornfeld Z, Hornberg C, Norra C, Zerbe S, et al. Therapeutic landscapes and psychiatric care facilities: a qualitative meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(3):1490. PMID: 35162518.

39. Anderson H, Stocker R, Russell S, Robinson L, Hanratty B, Robinson L, et al. Identity construction in the very old: a qualitative narrative study. PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0279098. PMID: 36520876.

40. Amini R, Shahboulaghi FM, Tabrizi KN, Forouzan AS. Social participation among Iranian community-dwelling older adults: a grounded theory study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022; 11(6):2311–2319. PMID: 36119239.

41. Green G, Sharon C, Gendler Y. The communication challenges and strength of nurses’ intensive corona care during the two first pandemic waves: a qualitative descriptive phenomenology study. Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(5):837. PMID: 35627974.

42. Horton A, Nugus P, Fortin MC, Landsberg D, Cantarovich M, Sandal S. Health system barriers and facilitators to living donor kidney transplantation: a qualitative case study in British Columbia. CMAJ Open. 2022; 10(2):E348–E356.

43. Buus N, Moensted M. Collectively learning to talk about personal concerns in a peer-led youth program: a field study of a community of practice. Health Soc Care Community. 2022; 30(6):e4425–e4432. PMID: 35608005.

44. Pyo J, Lee W, Choi EY, Jang SG, Ock M. Qualitative research in healthcare: necessity and characteristics. J Prev Med Public Health. 2023; 56(1):12–20. PMID: 36746418.

45. Introduction to qualitative research. Updated 2023. Accessed March 6, 2023. https://fdocuments.in/document/introduction-to-qualitative-research-powering-to-qualitative-research-scwk.html .

46. Bozhkova T, Musurlieva N, Slavchev D. Comparative study qualitative and quantitative techniques in the study of occlusion. BioMed Res Int. 2021; 2021:1163874. PMID: 34604379.

47. Price PC, Jhangiani R, Chiang IC, Leighton DC, Cuttler C. Correlational Research. Updated 2023. Accessed March 10, 2023. https://opentext.wsu.edu/carriecuttler/chapter/correlational-research/ .

48. Causal-Comparative Research. Updated 2023. Accessed March 10, 2023. https://www.academia.edu/35295194/Chapter_16_Causal_Comparative_Research_How_to_Design_and_Evaluate_Research_in_Education_8th?auto=download .

49. Andrade C. The limitations of quasi-experimental studies, and methods for data analysis when a quasi-experimental research design is unavoidable. Indian J Psychol Med. 2021; 43(5):451–452. PMID: 34584313.

50. Harris AD, McGregor JC, Perencevich EN, Furuno JP, Zhu J, Peterson DE, et al. The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 13(1):16–23. PMID: 16221933.

51. Alaofè H, Okechukwu A, Yeo S, Magrath P, Amoussa Hounkpatin W, Ehiri J, et al. Formative qualitative research: design considerations for a self-directed lifestyle intervention for type-2 diabetes patients using human-centered design principles in Benin. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18):11552. PMID: 36141824.

52. Bareiss W. Editorial tips on publishing qualitative research in medicine & healthcare. Qual Res Med Healthc. 2023; 6(3):11170. PMID: 37440989.

53. Stickley T, O’Caithain A, Homer C. The value of qualitative methods to public health research, policy and practice. Perspect Public Health. 2022; 142(4):237–240. PMID: 35362352.

54. Githaiga JN, Späth C, Sicwebu N, Perera S, Tolla T, Leon N. Critical reflections on conducting qualitative health research during COVID-19: The lived experiences of a cohort of postgraduate students in a South African university. Int J Qual Methods. 2023; 22:16094069221148406. PMID: 36628133.

55. Gaur PS, Zimba O, Agarwal V, Gupta L. Reporting survey based studies-a primer for authors. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(45):e398. PMID: 33230988.

56. Barisone M, Busca E, Bassi E, De Luca E, Profenna E, Suardi B, et al. The family and community nurses cultural model in the times of the COVID outbreak: a focused ethnographic study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3):1948. PMID: 36767312.

57. Loizeau V, Kilpatrick K, Bertrand DP, Rothan-Tondeur M. Exploring strategies for developing enabling environments for people with chronic heart disease: an ethnographic study protocol. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3):2680. PMID: 36768045.

58. Ladislav T, Creaner M. Essentials of Qualitative Meta-Analysis. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association;2022.

59. Ballantine C. The reaffirming of self? Narrative inquiry for researching violence against women and stigma. Violence Against Women. 2022; 28(9):2231–2253. PMID: 34424079.

60. Lavall E, Susin P, Reif KS, Schneider JF, Camatta MW. Narrative interview and reconstruction of biographic case: methodological alternative in nursing research. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2023; 43:e20220188. PMID: 36921142.

61. Introducing qualitative hypothesis-generating research (The Yeshiva University Fatherhood Project). Updated 2023. Accessed March 7, 2023. https://pdf4pro.com/download/introducing-qualitative-hypothesis-generating-research-4548b6.html .

62. Amaral G, Figueiredo AS. How to choose a preceptor: aspects to consider based on a grounded theory study. BMC Nurs. 2023; 22(1):90. PMID: 37004086.

63. Neubauer BE, Witkop CT, Varpio L. How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspect Med Educ. 2019; 8(2):90–97. PMID: 30953335.

64. Kamper SJ. Types of research questions: descriptive, predictive, or causal. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020; 50(8):468–469. PMID: 32736498.

65. Venkatesh Aravindh R, Thirupathi S. Data analysis in social sciences: comparison between quantitative and qualitative research. IJMRSS. 2019; 6(1):5–6.

66. Quantitative and qualitative research-difference. Updated 2023. Accessed March 7, 2023. https://www.studyandexam.com/quantitative-qualitative.html .

67. Kotronoulas G, Miguel S, Dowling M, Fernández-Ortega P, Colomer-Lahiguera S, Bağçivan G, et al. An overview of the fundamentals of data management, analysis, and interpretation in quantitative research. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2023; 39(2):151398. PMID: 36868925.

68. What is research hypothesis? Updated 2023. Accessed March 7, 2023. http://researcharticles.com/index.php/what-is-research-hypothesis/ .

69. Bates G, Le Gouais A, Barnfield A, Callway R, Hasan MN, Koksal C, et al. Balancing autonomy and collaboration in large-scale and disciplinary diverse teams for successful qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2023; 2:1–15.

70. Schoonenboom J. The fundamental difference between qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2023; 24(1):11.

71. Hammersley M. Are there assessment criteria for qualitative findings? A challenge facing mixed methods research. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2023; 24(1):1.