Korean J Leg Med.  2014 Nov;38(4):155-166. 10.7580/kjlm.2014.38.4.155.

A Qualitative Study of Psychological State of Suicide Victims through Suicide Notes

Affiliations
  • 1Psychological Forensics Division, National Forensic Service, Wonju, Korea. greey@sogang.ac.kr
  • 2Medical Examiner's Office, National Forensic Service, Wonju, Korea.
  • 3Forensic Medicine Division, Gwangju Institute, National Forensic Service, Jangseong, Korea.
  • 4Institute of Forensic Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. yoosh@snu.ac.kr

Abstract

Suicide notes are essential for investigating the psychological state of suicide victims and establishing suicide prevention programs. Since only a few studies have attempted to identify the causes of suicidal behavior through suicide notes, it would be worth examining suicide notes. Quantitative research on suicide has offered a limited understanding of suicide. Results showed that the suicide victims had used the suicide note as a tool for their last communication. Further, in addition to neutral contents such as directions for funeral, the note often contained information about precipitating events that caused the suicidal ideation. Writing a suicide note seemed to help the victims consider concrete plans for suicide. This study proved that qualitative research on suicide notes would be helpful for researchers to understand suicide victims in depth, which cannot be achieved by quantitative methods alone. Based on these results, several suggestions for suicide prevention programs were discussed.

Keyword

Suicide; Victims; Psychological; Qualitative research; Prevention

MeSH Terms

Qualitative Research
Suicidal Ideation
Suicide*
Writing

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Coding procedure.

  • Fig. 2. Suicide completer's paradigm: types of suicide selection presented in the suicide note.


Reference

References

1. Freuchen A, Groholt B. Characteristics of suicide notes of children and young adolescents: an examination of the notes from suicide victims 15 years and younger. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 4. [Epub].http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359104513504312.
Article
2. Leenaars AA. Suicide notes in the courtroom. J Clin Forensic Med. 1999; 6:39–48.
Article
3. Jones NJ, Bennell C. The development and validation of statistical prediction rules for discriminating between genuine and simulated suicide notes. Arch Suicide Res. 2007; 11:219–33.
Article
4. Sanger S, Veach PM. The interpersonal nature of suicide: a qualitative investigation of suicide notes. Arch Suicide Res. 2008; 12:352–65.
Article
5. Coster D, Lester D. Last words: analysis of suicide notes from an RECBT perspective: an exploratory study. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther. 2013; 31:136–51.
Article
6. Ho TP, Yip PS, Chiu CW, et al. Suicide notes: what do they tell us? Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1998; 98:467–73.
7. Ministry of Health & Welfare. Annual report 2013: national survey on suicide. Sejong: Ministry of Health & Welfare;2014.
8. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. Cross-national comparisons of death rate using OECD data. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2014.
9. Black ST. Comparing genuine and simulated suicide notes: a new perspective. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993; 61:699–702.
Article
10. Baek SK, Choi SH, Hur TK, et al. Suicidal notes, real or fake?: stereotypes on suicidal notes. Korean J Investig Psychol. 2014; 1:17–26.
11. Rogers JR, Bromley JL, McNally CJ, et al. Content analysis of suicide notes as a test of the motivational component of the existential-constructivist model of suicide. J Couns Dev. 2007; 85:182–8.
Article
12. Chavez-Hernandez AM, Leenaars AA, Chavez-de Sanchez MI, et al. Suicide notes from Mexico and the United States: a thematic analysis. Salud Publica Mex. 2009; 51:314–20.
13. Girdhar S, Leenaars AA, Dogra TD, et al. Suicide notes in India: what do they tell us? Arch Suicide Res. 2004; 8:179–85.
14. Tewksbury R. Qualitative versus quantitative methods: understanding why qualitative methods are superior for criminology and criminal justice. J Theor Philos Crim. 2009; 1:38–57.
15. Leenaars AA. In defense of the idiographic approach: studies of suicide notes and personal documents. Arch Suicide Res. 2002; 6:19–30.
16. Ro SW. A study on the adolescent suicides and ‘death-preparing education'. J Educ Dev. 2010; 26:5–26.
17. Kim HC, Sohn YM. A study on the characteristics of elderly suicide and suicidal type. Korean J Psychol Soc Issues. 2006; 12:1–19.
18. Ju YS, Lee MC. A qualitative study of the daily lives of ju-venile delinquents following a second offense. Stud Korean Youth. 2008; 19:5–31.
19. Choi HK. Usefulness and limitation for qualitative data analysis software(NVivo2): a comparison between conventional method and NVivo2. Korean J Policy Anal Eval. 2008; 18:123–51.
20. Choi JY. A qualitative study on changes in mother-child relationship through marriage process: focusing on christian family. Korea J Couns. 2009; 10:1697–725.
21. O'Connor RC, Leenaars AA. A thematic comparison of suicide notes drawn from northern Ireland and the United States. Curr Psychol Dev Learn Pers Soc. 2004; 22:339–47.
22. Shneidman ES. The suicidal mind. New York: Oxford University Press;1996.
23. Kim MJ, Son JH, Kim HJ. The actual conditioned of adolescents'use of language on the grounded theory. Forum Youth Cult. 2013; 34:8–22.
24. Psychological autopsy of completed suicide and case management services for attempted suicide. Seoul: Ministry of Health & Welfare, and Korean Association for Suicide Prevention;2009. p. 1–73.
25. Lester D. Qualitative research in suicidology: thoughts on Hjelmeland and Knizek's “why we need qualitative research in suicidology”. Suicidol Online. 2010; 1:76–8.
Full Text Links
  • KJLM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr