Asian Spine J.  2023 Aug;17(4):721-728. 10.31616/asj.2022.0443.

Utility of Seated Lateral Radiographs in the Diagnosis and Classification of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

• Issa TZ
• Lee Y
• Berthiaume E
• Lambrechts MJ
• Zaworski C
• Qadiri QS
• Spracklen H
• Padovano R
• Weber J
• Mangan JJ
• Canseco JA
• Woods BI
• Kaye ID
• Hilibrand AS
• Kepler CK
• Vaccaro AR
• Schroeder GD
• Lee JK

• KMID: 2545390
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2022.0443

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Purpose: Our goal was to determine which radiographic images are most essential for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) classification and instability detection. Overview of Literature: The heterogeneity in DS requires multiple imaging views to evaluate vertebral translation, disc space, slip angle, and instability. However, there are several restrictions on frequently used imaging perspectives such as flexion-extension and upright radiography.
Methods
We assessed baseline neutral upright, standing flexion, seated lateral radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients identified with spondylolisthesis from January 2021 to May 2022 by a single spine surgeon. DS was classified by Meyerding and Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis classifications. A difference of >10° or >8% between views, respectively, was used to characterize angular and translational instability. Analysis of variance and paired chi-square tests were utilized to compare modalities.
Results
A total of 136 patients were included. Seated lateral and standing flexion radiographs showed the greatest slip percentage (16.0% and 16.7%), while MRI revealed the lowest (12.2%, p <0.001). Standing flexion and lateral radiographs when seated produced more kyphosis (4.66° and 4.97°, respectively) than neutral upright and MRI (7.19° and 7.20°, p <0.001). Seated lateral performed similarly to standing flexion in detecting all measurement parameters and categorizing DS (all p >0.05). Translational instability was shown to be more prevalent when associated with seated lateral or standing flexion than when combined with neutral upright (31.5% vs. 20.2%, p =0.041; and 28.1% vs. 14.6%, p =0.014, respectively). There were no differences between seated lateral or standing flexion in the detection of instability (all p >0.20).
Conclusions
Seated lateral radiographs are appropriate alternatives for standing flexion radiographs. Films taken when standing up straight do not offer any more information for DS detection. Rather than standing flexion-extension radiographs, instability can be detected using an MRI, which is often performed preoperatively, paired with a single seated lateral radiograph.

Keyword

Lumbar spine; Spondylolisthesis; Radiography; Seated lateral; Flexion-extension