KoreaMed, a service of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors (KAMJE), provides access to articles published in Korean medical, dental, nursing, nutrition and veterinary journals. KoreaMed records include links to full-text content in Synapse and publisher web sites.
Objective To evaluate the following null hypothesis: the skeletal and dentoalveolar expansion patterns in the coronal and axial planes are not different with two different types of microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) systems.
Methods Pretreatment (T0) and post-MARPE (T1) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 32 patients (14 males and 18 females; mean age, 19.37) were analyzed. We compared two different MARPE systems. One MARPE system included the maxillary first premolars, maxillary first molars, and four microimplants as anchors (U46 type, n = 16), while the other included only the maxillary first molars and microimplants as anchors (U6 type, n = 16).
Results In the molar region of the U6 and U46 groups, the transverse expansion at the midnasal, basal, alveolar, and dental levels was 2.64, 3.52, 4.46, and 6.32 mm and 2.17, 2.56, 2.73, and 5.71 mm, respectively. A significant difference was observed in the posterior alveolar-level expansion (p = 0.036) and posterior basal-bone-level expansion (p = 0.043) between the groups, with greater posterior skeletal and alveolar expansion in the U6 group.
Conclusions Compared with the U46 group, the U6 group showed greater posterior expansion at the alveolar and basal-bone levels, with an almost parallel split. Both groups showed a pyramidal expansion pattern in the coronal view.
Figure 1
MARPE appliances. A, U46 type (MSE-12; Biomaterials, Seoul, Korea). B, U6 type (MSE-12; Biomaterials).
MARPE, microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion.
Figure 2
Re-orientation A, Sagittal view: palatal plane is parallel to the axial plane. B, Coronal view: 3D image, the line joining the lower margins of the orbits is parallel to the axial plane. C, D, Axial view: Lines passing through the palatal root canals of the bilateral maxillary first premolars (C) and first molars (D).
Figure 3
Landmarks used in this study. 1, The most lateral point of the nasofrontal suture. 2, The most lateral point of the nasal cavity. 3, The most inferolateral point of the zygomaticomaxillary suture. 4, Ectocanine, the most inferolateral point on the alveolar ridge at the center of the maxillary canine. 5, Ectopremolare, the most inferolateral point on the alveolar ridge at the center of the maxillary first premolar. 6, Ectomolare, the most inferolateral point on the alveolar ridge at the center of the maxillary first molar. The measurement definitions are presented in Table 1.
Figure 4
Skeletal expansion measurement. A, The distance between the most lateral points of the nasal cavity was measured for the midnasal-level premolar width. The distance between the most medial points on the basal bone at the junction of the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus and the buccal cortex of the maxillary alveolar bone was measured for the basal-bone-level premolar width. B, The distance between the most lateral points of the nasal cavity was measured for the midnasal-level molar width. The distance between the most medial points on the basal bone at the junction of the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus and the buccal cortex of the maxillary alveolar bone was measured for the basal-bone-level molar width.
BL_PMW, basal bone level premolar width; BL_MW, basal bone level molar width; MNL_PMW, midnasal level premolar width; MNL_MW, midnasal level molar width.
Figure 5
Linear dental measurement. IPW, and IMW were measured using a 3D coordinate system.
3D, three-dimensional; IPW, inter-premolar width; IMW, inter-molar width.
Figure 6
Dental angular measurement. A, The angle between the lines joining the bilateral fossa and palatal root apices of the maxillary first premolars was measured as the inter-premolar angle. B, The angle between the lines joining the bilateral fossa and palatal root apices of the maxillary first molars was measured as the inter-molar angle.
Figure 7
Bicortical engagement at the palate and nasal floor by microimplants. A, Coronal view. B, Sagittal view.
Figure 8
Comparison of the skeletal, alveolar, and dental maxillary expansion in the premolar and molar regions between the U6 and the U46 groups.
Figure 9
A, Distance from the ANS to the posterior microimplant in the U46 group (mean, 29.26 mm), B, distance from the ANS to the posterior microimplant in the U6 group (mean, 38.91 mm).
ANS, anterior nasal spine.
9. Annarumma F, Posadino M, De Mari A, Drago S, Aghazada H, Gravina GM, et al. 2021; Skeletal and dental changes after maxillary expansion with a bone-borne appliance in young and late adolescent patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 159:e363–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.11.031. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.11.031. PMID: 33573898.
13. MacGinnis M, Chu H, Youssef G, Wu KW, Machado AW, Moon W. 2014; The effects of micro-implant assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) on the nasomaxillary complex--a finite element method (FEM) analysis. Prog Orthod. 15:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0052-y. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-014-0052-y. PMID: 25242527. PMCID: PMC4148550.
14. De Cock J, Mermuys K, Goubau J, Van Petegem S, Houthoofd B, Casselman JW. 2012; Cone-beam computed tomography: a new low dose, high resolution imaging technique of the wrist, presentation of three cases with technique. Skeletal Radiol. 41:93–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1198-z. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1198-z. PMID: 21603872.
17. Farronato M, Maspero C, Abate A, Grippaudo C, Connelly ST, Tartaglia GM. 2020; 3D cephalometry on reduced FOV CBCT: skeletal class assessment through AF-BF on Frankfurt plane-validity and reliability through comparison with 2D measurements. Eur Radiol. 30:6295–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06905-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06905-7. PMID: 32382843.
18. Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, et al. 2011; Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 140:734–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.021. PMID: 22051495.
20. Lione R, Ballanti F, Franchi L, Baccetti T, Cozza P. 2008; Treatment and posttreatment skeletal effects of rapid maxillary expansion studied with low-dose computed tomography in growing subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 134:389–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.05.011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.05.011. PMID: 18774085.
21. Lee DW, Park JH, Moon W, Seo HY, Chae JM. 2021; Effects of bicortical anchorage on pterygopalatine suture opening with microimplant-assisted maxillary skeletal expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 159:502–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.02.013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.02.013. PMID: 33495061.
23. Koo YJ, Choi SH, Keum BT, Yu HS, Hwang CJ, Melsen B, et al. 2017; Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance: comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod. 47:167–75. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.167. DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.167. PMID: 28523243. PMCID: PMC5432438.
24. Magnusson A, Bjerklin K, Kim H, Nilsson P, Marcusson A. 2012; Three-dimensional assessment of transverse skeletal changes after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion and orthodontic treatment: a prospective computerized tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 142:825–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.08.015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.08.015. PMID: 23195368.
27. Lagravère MO, Carey J, Heo G, Toogood RW, Major PW. 2010; Transverse, vertical, and anteroposterior changes from bone-anchored maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 137:304.e1–12. discussion 304–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.09.016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.09.016. PMID: 20197161.
28. Altieri F, Cassetta M. 2022; Comparison of changes in skeletal, dentoalveolar, periodontal, and nasal structures after tooth-borne or bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion: a parallel cohort study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 161:e336–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.11.007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.11.007. PMID: 34996663.
29. Carlson C, Sung J, McComb RW, Machado AW, Moon W. 2016; Microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliance to orthopedically correct transverse maxillary deficiency in an adult. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 149:716–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.043. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.043. PMID: 27131254.
34. Ramieri GA, Spada MC, Austa M, Bianchi SD, Berrone S. 2005; Transverse maxillary distraction with a bone-anchored appliance: dento-periodontal effects and clinical and radiological results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 34:357–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2004.10.011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.10.011. PMID: 16053842.