Oral Biol Res.  2022 Dec;46(4):150-157. 10.21851/obr.46.04.202212.150.

Case series of maxillary anterior bone augmentation with a novel biphasic calcium phosphate: a clinical and radiographic pilot study

Affiliations
  • 1Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology, Institute of Wonkwang Dental Research, Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University College of Dentistry, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • 2Resident, Department of Periodontology, Institute of Wonkwang Dental Research, Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University College of Dentistry, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • 3Director, Research & Development Center, MEGAGEN Implant Co., Ltd., Daegu, Republic of Korea
  • 4Senior Research Engineer, Research & Development Center, MEGAGEN Implant Co., Ltd., Daegu, Republic of Korea
  • 5Professor, Department of Periodontology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 6Professor, Department of Periodontology, Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
  • 7Professor, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot case series was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of employing newly developed alloplastic biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) in guided bone regeneration (GBR) for maxillary anterior peri-implant defects. Six peri-implant dehiscence defects were grafted with BCP. For all included treatment sites, clinical (defect width [DW] and defect height [DH]), radiographic (horizontal hard tissue thickness [HT]), patient discomfort, and early wound healing outcomes were evaluated. At reentry surgery, all surgical sites indicated a change in DW, DH, HT0, HT1, HT2, and HT3 from 4.08±1.39 mm to 1.13±1.76 mm, 3.57±1.42 mm to 0.58±1.09 mm, 2.18±0.66 mm to 1.50±0.53 mm, 2.11±0.57 mm to 1.73±0.28 mm, 2.22±0.54 mm to 1.75±0.26 mm, and 2.63±0.87 mm to 1.83±0.46 mm, respectively. Significant differences were discovered between paired DW and DH (p<0.05), whereas radiographic parameters had no significant differences. The severity of pain and swelling was 4.8±1.9 and 6.5±1.9, respectively, and the duration of pain and swelling was 4.5±3.8 and 5.8±2.9 days, respectively, according to early postoperative discomfort assessment. No adverse reactions occurred at any treatment site. In terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes, the newly developed BCP is acceptable biocompatible and suitable for the GBR of maxillary anterior peri-implant dehiscence defects within the limitations of this study.

Keyword

Allografts; Bone regeneration; Bone substitutes; Dental implants
Full Text Links
  • OBR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr