Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2022 Feb;26(1):1-16. 10.14701/ahbps.22-009.

Korean Surgical Practice Guideline for Pancreatic Cancer 2021: A summary of evidence-based surgical approaches

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
  • 3Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 6Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 7Department of Surgery, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
  • 8Department of Surgery, Soon Chun Hyang University School of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
  • 9Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is the eighth most common cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in Korea. Despite the increasing incidence and high mortality rate of pancreatic cancer, there are no appropriate surgical practice guidelines for the current domestic medical situation. To enable standardization of management and facilitate improvements in surgical outcome, a total of 10 pancreatic surgical experts who are members of Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery have developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date, evidence-based research findings and expert opinions. This is an English version of the Korean Surgical Practice Guideline for Pancreatic Cancer 2021. This guideline includes 13 surgical questions and 15 statements. Due to the lack of high-level evidence, strong recommendation is almost impossible. However, we believe that this guideline will help surgeons understand the current status of evidence and suggest what to investigate further to establish more solid recommendations in the future.

Keyword

Pancreatic carcinoma; Surgery; Practice guideline

Reference

1. Hong S, Won YJ, Park YR, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Lee ES. 2020; Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2017. Cancer Res Treat. 52:335–350. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2020.206. PMID: 32178489. PMCID: PMC7176962.
Article
2. Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C, Hollebecque A, Burtin P, Goéré D, et al. 2015; Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 26 Suppl 5:v56–v68. Erratum in: Ann Oncol 2017;28 Suppl 4:iv167-iv168. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv295. PMID: 26314780.
Article
3. Okusaka T, Nakamura M, Yoshida M, Kitano M, Uesaka K, Ito Y, et al. 2020; Clinical Practice Guidelines for pancreatic cancer 2019 from the Japan Pancreas Society: a synopsis. Pancreas. 49:326–335. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001513. PMID: 32132516. PMCID: PMC7077959.
Article
4. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, Behrman SW, Benson AB, Cardin DB, et al. 2021; Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 19:439–457. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0017. PMID: 33845462.
5. Committee of the Korean clinical practice guideline for pancreatic cancer and National Cancer Center, Korea. Korean clinical practice guideline for pancreatic cancer 2021: a summary of evidence-based, multi-disciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Pancreatology. 2021; 21:1326–1341. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.05.004. PMID: 34148794.
6. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. 2011; The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 343:d5928. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5928. PMID: 22008217. PMCID: PMC3196245.
Article
7. Kim SY, Park JE, Lee YJ, Seo HJ, Sheen SS, Hahn S, et al. 2013; Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 66:408–414. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.016. PMID: 23337781.
Article
8. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, et al. 2009; AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 62:1013–1020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009. PMID: 19230606.
Article
9. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. 2011; QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 155:529–536. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. PMID: 22007046.
Article
10. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. 2010; Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement. CMAJ. 182:1045–1052. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091714. PMID: 20513780. PMCID: PMC2900328.
Article
11. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. 2010; Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ. 182:E472–E478. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091716. PMID: 20513779. PMCID: PMC2900368.
Article
12. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. 2008; GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 336:924–926. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. PMID: 18436948. PMCID: PMC2335261.
Article
13. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ. 2008; What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 336:995–998. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE. PMID: 18456631. PMCID: PMC2364804.
Article
14. Sell NM, Fong ZV, Del Castillo CF, Qadan M, Warshaw AL, Chang D, et al. 2018; Staging laparoscopy not only saves patients an incision, but may also help them live longer. Ann Surg Oncol. 25:1009–1016. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6317-1. PMID: 29388123.
Article
15. Schnelldorfer T, Gagnon AI, Birkett RT, Reynolds G, Murphy KM, Jenkins RL. 2014; Staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer: a potential role for advanced laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg. 218:1201–1206. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.018. PMID: 24698487.
Article
16. Ahmed SI, Bochkarev V, Oleynikov D, Sasson AR. 2006; Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma benefit from staging laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 16:458–463. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.458. PMID: 17004868.
Article
17. Contreras CM, Stanelle EJ, Mansour J, Hinshaw JL, Rikkers LF, Rettammel R, et al. 2009; Staging laparoscopy enhances the detection of occult metastases in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 100:663–669. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21402. PMID: 19780095.
Article
18. Paracha M, Van Orden K, Patts G, Tseng J, McAneny D, Sachs T. 2019; Opportunity lost? Diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with pancreatic cancer in the national surgical quality improvement program database. World J Surg. 43:937–943. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4855-8. PMID: 30478680.
Article
19. Yamamura K, Yamashita YI, Yamao T, Kuroda D, Eto T, Kitano Y, et al. 2020; Efficacy of staging laparoscopy for pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 40:1023–1027. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14037. PMID: 32014948.
Article
20. Ta R, O'Connor DB, Sulistijo A, Chung B, Conlon KC. 2019; The role of staging laparoscopy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg. 36:251–260. DOI: 10.1159/000488372. PMID: 29649825.
Article
21. De Rosa A, Cameron IC, Gomez D. 2016; Indications for staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 18:13–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.10.004. PMID: 26776846. PMCID: PMC4750228.
Article
22. Pisters PW, Lee JE, Vauthey JN, Charnsangavej C, Evans DB. 2001; Laparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 88:325–337. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01695.x. PMID: 11260096.
Article
23. Choi M, Hwang HK, Rho SY, Lee WJ, Kang CM. 2020; Comparing laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic head cancer: oncologic outcomes and inflammatory scores. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 27:124–131. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.697. PMID: 31705719.
Article
24. Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, et al. 2014; Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg. 260:633–638. discussion 638–640. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000937. PMID: 25203880.
25. Girgis MD, Zenati MS, King JC, Hamad A, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, et al. 2021; Oncologic outcomes after robotic pancreatic resections are not inferior to open surgery. Ann Surg. 274:e262–e268. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003615. PMID: 31663967. PMCID: PMC8683907.
Article
26. Kuesters S, Chikhladze S, Makowiec F, Sick O, Fichtner-Feigl S, Hopt UT, et al. 2018; Oncological outcome of laparoscopically assisted pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 55:162–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.026. PMID: 29807171.
Article
27. Stauffer JA, Coppola A, Villacreses D, Mody K, Johnson E, Li Z, et al. 2017; Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution. Surg Endosc. 31:2233–2241. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5222-1. PMID: 27604369.
Article
28. Zhou W, Jin W, Wang D, Lu C, Xu X, Zhang R, et al. 2019; Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis. Cancer Commun (Lond). 39:66. DOI: 10.1186/s40880-019-0410-8. PMID: 31661036. PMCID: PMC6819395.
Article
29. Adam MA, Choudhury K, Dinan MA, Reed SD, Scheri RP, Blazer DG 3rd, et al. 2015; Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: practice patterns and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients. Ann Surg. 262:372–377. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001055. PMID: 26158612.
30. Jiang YL, Zhang RC, Zhou YC. 2019; Comparison of overall survival and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 19:781. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6001-x. PMID: 31391085. PMCID: PMC6686510.
Article
31. Peng L, Zhou Z, Cao Z, Wu W, Xiao W, Cao J. 2019; Long-term oncological outcomes in laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 29:759–769. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0683. PMID: 30835156.
Article
32. Yin Z, Jian Z, Hou B, Jin H. 2019; Surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 48:861–867. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001363. PMID: 31306305.
Article
33. Chen K, Zhou Y, Jin W, Zhu Q, Lu C, Niu N, et al. 2020; Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic outcomes and long-term survival. Surg Endosc. 34:1948–1958. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06968-8. PMID: 31317331.
Article
34. Lee SH, Kang CM, Hwang HK, Choi SH, Lee WJ, Chi HS. 2014; Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria: long-term (>median 3 years) oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 28:2848–2855. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3537-3. PMID: 24853839.
Article
35. Sulpice L, Farges O, Goutte N, Bendersky N, Dokmak S, Sauvanet A, et al. 2015; Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: time for a randomized controlled trial? Results of an all-inclusive national observational study. Ann Surg. 262:868–873. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001479. PMID: 26583678.
36. van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, Rawashdeh M, Aleotti F, Al-Sarireh B, et al. 2019; Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg. 269:10–17. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002561. PMID: 29099399.
37. Zhang M, Fang R, Mou Y, Chen R, Xu X, Zhang R, et al. 2015; LDP vs ODP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a case matched study from a single-institution. BMC Gastroenterol. 15:182. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-015-0411-2. PMID: 26695506. PMCID: PMC4687064.
Article
38. Anderson KL Jr, Adam MA, Thomas S, Roman SA, Sosa JA. 2017; Impact of minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy on use of adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 213:601–605. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.005. PMID: 28093119.
Article
39. Kantor O, Bryan DS, Talamonti MS, Lutfi W, Sharpe S, Winchester DJ, et al. 2017; Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for cancer provides oncologic outcomes and overall survival identical to open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 21:1620–1625. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3506-y. PMID: 28766272.
Article
40. Riviere D, Gurusamy KS, Kooby DA, Vollmer CM, Besselink MG, Davidson BR, et al. 2016; Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 4:CD011391. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011391.pub2. PMID: 27043078. PMCID: PMC7083263.
Article
41. Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, DiMagno EP, Burgart LJ, Dahl TR, et al. 2005; A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery. 138:618–628. discussion 628–630. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.044. PMID: 16269290.
Article
42. Nimura Y, Nagino M, Takao S, Takada T, Miyazaki K, Kawarada Y, et al. 2012; Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 19:230–241. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-011-0466-6. PMID: 22038501.
Article
43. Jang JY, Kang MJ, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW, Park SJ, et al. 2014; A prospective randomized controlled study comparing outcomes of standard resection and extended resection, including dissection of the nerve plexus and various lymph nodes, in patients with pancreatic head cancer. Ann Surg. 259:656–664. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000384. PMID: 24368638.
Article
44. Jang JY, Kang JS, Han Y, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW, et al. 2017; Long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of standard versus extended pancreatectomy for pancreatic head cancer: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 24:426–433. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.465. PMID: 28514000.
Article
45. Ignjatovic I, Knezevic S, Knezevic D, Dugalic V, Micev M, Matic S, et al. 2017; Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical surgical treatment for pancreatic head carcinoma. J BUON. 22:232–238. PMID: 28365959.
46. Svoronos C, Tsoulfas G, Katsourakis A, Noussios G, Chatzitheoklitos E, Marakis NG. 2014; Role of extended lymphadenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 84:706–711. DOI: 10.1111/ans.12423. PMID: 24165093.
Article
47. Wang W, He Y, Wu L, Ye L, Yao L, Tang Z. 2019; Efficacy of extended versus standard lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. An update meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 19:1074–1080. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.10.003. PMID: 31668841.
Article
48. Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN, Diener MK, Büchler MW, Friess H. 2007; Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 94:265–273. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5716. PMID: 17318801.
Article
49. Giovinazzo F, Turri G, Katz MH, Heaton N, Ahmed I. 2016; Meta-analysis of benefits of portal-superior mesenteric vein resection in pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 103:179–191. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9969. PMID: 26663252.
Article
50. Peng C, Zhou D, Meng L, Cao Y, Zhang H, Pan Z, et al. 2019; The value of combined vein resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma: a meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 19:84. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0540-6. PMID: 31286916. PMCID: PMC6615269.
Article
51. Bell R, Ao BT, Ironside N, Bartlett A, Windsor JA, Pandanaboyana S. 2017; Meta-analysis and cost effective analysis of portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatoduodenectomy: impact on margin status and survival. Surg Oncol. 26:53–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2016.12.007. PMID: 28317585.
Article
52. Yu XZ, Li J, Fu DL, Di Y, Yang F, Hao SJ, et al. 2014; Benefit from synchronous portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 40:371–378. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.01.010. PMID: 24560302.
Article
53. Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Li B, Xu D. 2012; Pancreatectomy combined with superior mesenteric vein-portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg. 36:884–891. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1461-z. PMID: 22350478.
Article
54. Amano H, Miura F, Toyota N, Wada K, Katoh K, Hayano K, et al. 2009; Is pancreatectomy with arterial reconstruction a safe and useful procedure for locally advanced pancreatic cancer? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 16:850–857. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0190-7. PMID: 19844653.
Article
55. Bockhorn M, Burdelski C, Bogoevski D, Sgourakis G, Yekebas EF, Izbicki JR. 2011; Arterial en bloc resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Surg. 98:86–92. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7270. PMID: 21136564.
56. Bachellier P, Rosso E, Lucescu I, Oussoultzoglou E, Tracey J, Pessaux P, et al. 2011; Is the need for an arterial resection a contraindication to pancreatic resection for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma? A case-matched controlled study. J Surg Oncol. 103:75–84. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21769. PMID: 21105000.
Article
57. Mollberg N, Rahbari NN, Koch M, Hartwig W, Hoeger Y, Büchler MW, et al. 2011; Arterial resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 254:882–893. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823ac299. PMID: 22064622.
58. Małczak P, Sierżęga M, Stefura T, Kacprzyk A, Droś J, Skomarovska O, et al. 2020; Arterial resections in pancreatic cancer - systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 22:961–968. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.04.005. PMID: 32360186.
Article
59. Haines M, Chua TC, Jamieson NB, Mittal A, Gill AJ, Samra JS. 2020; Pancreatoduodenectomy with arterial resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer of the head: a systematic review. Pancreas. 49:621–628. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001551. PMID: 32433398.
Article
60. Wu X, Tao R, Lei R, Han B, Cheng D, Shen B, et al. 2010; Distal pancreatectomy combined with celiac axis resection in treatment of carcinoma of the body/tail of the pancreas: a single-center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 17:1359–1366. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0840-7. PMID: 20198445.
Article
61. Beane JD, House MG, Pitt SC, Kilbane EM, Hall BL, Parmar AD, et al. 2015; Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection: what are the added risks? HPB (Oxford). 17:777–784. DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12453. PMID: 26201994. PMCID: PMC4557651.
Article
62. Yamamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Ban D, Shimada K, Esaki M, Nara S, et al. 2012; Is celiac axis resection justified for T4 pancreatic body cancer? Surgery. 151:61–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.030. PMID: 22088810.
Article
63. Peters NA, Javed AA, Cameron JL, Makary MA, Hirose K, Pawlik TM, et al. 2016; Modified Appleby procedure for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does improved neoadjuvant therapy warrant such an aggressive approach? Ann Surg Oncol. 23:3757–3764. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5303-3. PMID: 27328946.
Article
64. Gong H, Ma R, Gong J, Cai C, Song Z, Xu B. 2016; Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 95:e3061. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003061. PMID: 26962836. PMCID: PMC4998917.
65. Nigri G, Petrucciani N, Belloni E, Lucarini A, Aurello P, D'Angelo F, et al. 2021; Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 13:1967. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081967. PMID: 33921838. PMCID: PMC8073522.
Article
66. Storkholm JH, Burgdorf SK, Hansen CP. 2020; Distal pancreas-coeliac axis resection with preoperative selective embolization of the coeliac axis: a single high-volume centre experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 405:635–645. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01919-7. PMID: 32683485.
Article
67. Kawabata Y, Tanaka T, Nishi T, Monma H, Yano S, Tajima Y. 2012; Appraisal of a total meso-pancreatoduodenum excision with pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 38:574–579. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.04.007. PMID: 22575529.
Article
68. Xu J, Tian X, Chen Y, Ma Y, Liu C, Tian L, et al. 2017; Total mesopancreas excision for the treatment of pancreatic head cancer. J Cancer. 8:3575–3584. DOI: 10.7150/jca.21341. PMID: 29151943. PMCID: PMC5687173.
Article
69. Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Nakazato T, Yokoyama M, Kogure M, Abe N, et al. 2016; Intestinal derotation procedure for facilitating pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery. 159:1325–1332. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.014. PMID: 26767309.
Article
70. Aimoto T, Mizutani S, Kawano Y, Matsushita A, Yamashita N, Suzuki H, et al. 2013; Left posterior approach pancreaticoduodenectomy with total mesopancreas excision and circumferential lymphadenectomy around the superior mesenteric artery for pancreatic head carcinoma. J Nippon Med Sch. 80:438–445. DOI: 10.1272/jnms.80.438. PMID: 24419715.
Article
71. Srinarmwong C, Luechakiettisak P, Prasitvilai W. 2008; Standard whipple's operation versus pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial study. J Med Assoc Thai. 91:693–698.
72. Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S, Ina S, Miyazawa M, Fujita Y, et al. 2009; Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surg Today. 39:219–224. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-008-3847-y. PMID: 19280281.
Article
73. Kawai M, Tani M, Hirono S, Okada K, Miyazawa M, Yamaue H. 2014; Pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy offers long-term outcomes similar to those of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective study. World J Surg. 38:1476–1483. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2420-z. PMID: 24370543.
Article
74. Iqbal N, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, Abraham AT, Bhattacharya S, Tekkis PP, et al. 2008; A comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of 2822 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 34:1237–1245. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.12.004. PMID: 18242943.
Article
75. Yang C, Wu HS, Chen XL, Wang CY, Gou SM, Xiao J, et al. 2014; Pylorus-preserving versus pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 9:e90316. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090316. PMID: 24603478. PMCID: PMC3946060.
Article
76. Hüttner FJ, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Büchler MW, et al. 2016; Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2:CD006053. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006053.pub6. PMID: 26905229. PMCID: PMC8255094.
Article
77. Klaiber U, Probst P, Hüttner FJ, Bruckner T, Strobel O, Diener MK, et al. 2020; Randomized trial of pylorus-preserving vs. pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy: long-term morbidity and quality of life. J Gastrointest Surg. 24:341–352. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-04102-y. PMID: 30671796.
Article
78. Fatima J, Schnelldorfer T, Barton J, Wood CM, Wiste HJ, Smyrk TC, et al. 2010; Pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: implications of positive margin on survival. Arch Surg. 145:167–172. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.282. PMID: 20157085.
79. Pang TC, Wilson O, Argueta MA, Hugh TJ, Chou A, Samra JS, et al. 2014; Frozen section of the pancreatic neck margin in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is of limited utility. Pathology. 46:188–192. DOI: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000072. PMID: 24614707.
Article
80. Mathur A, Ross SB, Luberice K, Kurian T, Vice M, Toomey P, et al. 2014; Margin status impacts survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy but negative margins should not be pursued. Am Surg. 80:353–360. DOI: 10.1177/000313481408000416. PMID: 24887665.
Article
81. Nitschke P, Volk A, Welsch T, Hackl J, Reissfelder C, Rahbari M, et al. 2017; Impact of intraoperative re-resection to achieve R0 status on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a single-center experience with 483 patients. Ann Surg. 265:1219–1225. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001808. PMID: 27280512.
Article
82. Dikmen K, Kerem M, Bostanci H, Sare M, Ekinci O. 2018; Intra-operative frozen section histology of the pancreatic resection margins and clinical outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Med Sci Monit. 24:4905–4913. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.910279. PMID: 30007990. PMCID: PMC6067030.
Article
83. Crippa S, Guarneri G, Belfiori G, Partelli S, Pagnanelli M, Gasparini G, et al. 2020; Positive neck margin at frozen section analysis is a significant predictor of tumour recurrence and poor survival after pancreatodudenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 46:1524–1531. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.013. PMID: 32098733.
Article
84. Barreto SG, Pandanaboyana S, Ironside N, Windsor JA. 2017; Does revision of resection margins based on frozen section improve overall survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 19:573–579. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.03.006. PMID: 28420560.
Article
85. Petrucciani N, Nigri G, Debs T, Giannini G, Sborlini E, Antolino L, et al. 2016; Frozen section analysis of the pancreatic margin during pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: Does extending the resection to obtain a secondary R0 provide a survival benefit? Results of a systematic review. Pancreatology. 16:1037–1043. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.09.004. PMID: 27697467.
Article
86. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D. 2003; Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery. 133:521–527. DOI: 10.1067/msy.2003.146. PMID: 12773980.
Article
87. Zhou Q, Fengwei-Gao , Gong J, Xie Q, Liu Y, Wang Q, et al. 2019; Assessement of postoperative long-term survival quality and complications associated with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Surg. 19:12. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0476-x. PMID: 30691444. PMCID: PMC6348671.
Article
88. Sham JG, Guo S, Ding D, Shao Z, Wright M, Jing W, et al. 2020; Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer, a dual-institutional analysis. Chin Clin Oncol. 9:54. Erratum in: Chin Clin Oncol 2020;9:72. DOI: 10.21037/cco-20-6. PMID: 32576018.
Article
89. Abe T, Ohuchida K, Miyasaka Y, Ohtsuka T, Oda Y, Nakamura M. 2016; Comparison of surgical outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for left-sided pancreatic cancer. World J Surg. 40:2267–2275. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3526-x. PMID: 27138881.
Article
90. Grossman JG, Fields RC, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM. 2016; Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 23:432–441. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.362. PMID: 27207482.
Article
91. Kim EY, You YK, Kim DG, Hong TH. 2016; Initial experience with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy in a single institution. Ann Surg Treat Res. 91:29–36. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2016.91.1.29. PMID: 27433462. PMCID: PMC4942536.
Article
92. Kawabata Y, Hayashi H, Kaji S, Fujii Y, Nishi T, Tajima Y. 2020; Laparoscopic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with artery-first approach in pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 405:647–656. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01887-y. PMID: 32524466.
Article
93. Kim HS, Hong TH, You YK, Park JS, Yoon DS. 2021; Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: findings of a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score matching study. Surg Today. 51:1775–1786. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02280-y. PMID: 33830293.
Article
94. Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Hardacre JM, Sohn TA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, et al. 1999; Is prophylactic gastrojejunostomy indicated for unresectable periampullary cancer? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 230:322–328. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00005. PMID: 10493479. PMCID: PMC1420877.
Article
95. Wong YT, Brams DM, Munson L, Sanders L, Heiss F, Chase M, et al. 2002; Gastric outlet obstruction secondary to pancreatic cancer: surgical vs endoscopic palliation. Surg Endosc. 16:310–312. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9061-2. PMID: 11967685.
Article
96. Gurusamy KS, Kumar S, Davidson BR. 2013; Prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013:CD008533. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008533.pub3. PMID: 23450583. PMCID: PMC7173743.
Article
97. Upchurch E, Ragusa M, Cirocchi R. 2018; Stent placement versus surgical palliation for adults with malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 5:CD012506. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012506.pub2. PMID: 29845610. PMCID: PMC6494580.
Article
98. Williamsson C, Wennerblom J, Tingstedt B, Jönsson C. 2016; A wait-and-see strategy with subsequent self-expanding metal stent on demand is superior to prophylactic bypass surgery for unresectable periampullary cancer. HPB (Oxford). 18:107–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.08.009. PMID: 26776858. PMCID: PMC4750237.
Article
99. Doi R, Kami K, Ito D, Fujimoto K, Kawaguchi Y, Wada M, et al. 2007; Prognostic implication of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic cancer. World J Surg. 31:147–154. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-0730-5. PMID: 17171496.
Article
100. Schwarz L, Lupinacci RM, Svrcek M, Lesurtel M, Bubenheim M, Vuarnesson H, et al. 2014; Para-aortic lymph node sampling in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 101:530–538. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9444. PMID: 24633831.
Article
101. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Yuasa Y, Sueda T. 2010; Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Surg. 34:1900–1907. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0577-2. PMID: 20376442.
Article
102. Sho M, Murakami Y, Motoi F, Satoi S, Matsumoto I, Kawai M, et al. 2015; Postoperative prognosis of pancreatic cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a multicenter study on 822 patients. J Gastroenterol. 50:694–702. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-014-1005-4. PMID: 25341657.
Article
103. Hempel S, Plodeck V, Mierke F, Distler M, Aust DE, Saeger HD, et al. 2017; Para-aortic lymph node metastases in pancreatic cancer should not be considered a watershed for curative resection. Sci Rep. 7:7688. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08165-w. PMID: 28794500. PMCID: PMC5550512.
Article
104. Agalianos C, Gouvas N, Papaparaskeva K, Dervenis C. 2016; Positive para-aortic lymph nodes following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Systematic review and meta-analysis of impact on short term survival and association with clinicopathologic features. HPB (Oxford). 18:633–641. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.04.007. PMID: 27485057. PMCID: PMC4972380.
Article
105. Paiella S, Sandini M, Gianotti L, Butturini G, Salvia R, Bassi C. 2016; The prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 42:616–624. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.003. PMID: 26916137.
Article
106. Asaoka T, Miyamoto A, Maeda S, Hama N, Tsujie M, Ikeda M, et al. 2018; CA19-9 level determines therapeutic modality in pancreatic cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 17:75–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.01.004. PMID: 29428109.
Article
107. Hackert T, Niesen W, Hinz U, Tjaden C, Strobel O, Ulrich A, et al. 2017; Radical surgery of oligometastatic pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 43:358–363. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.023. PMID: 27856064.
Article
108. Zanini N, Lombardi R, Masetti M, Giordano M, Landolfo G, Jovine E. 2015; Surgery for isolated liver metastases from pancreatic cancer. Updates Surg. 67:19–25. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-015-0283-6. PMID: 25702263.
Article
109. Dünschede F, Will L, von Langsdorf C, Möhler M, Galle PR, Otto G, et al. 2010; Treatment of metachronous and simultaneous liver metastases of pancreatic cancer. Eur Surg Res. 44:209–213. DOI: 10.1159/000313532. PMID: 20571276.
Article
110. Yu X, Gu J, Fu D, Jin C. 2017; Dose surgical resection of hepatic metastases bring benefits to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 48:149–154. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.066. PMID: 29081375.
Article
111. Marthey L, Sa-Cunha A, Blanc JF, Gauthier M, Cueff A, Francois E, et al. 2015; FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of an AGEO multicenter prospective observational cohort. Ann Surg Oncol. 22:295–301. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3898-9. PMID: 25037971.
Article
112. Habermehl D, Kessel K, Welzel T, Hof H, Abdollahi A, Bergmann F, et al. 2012; Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with Gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Radiat Oncol. 7:28. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-28. PMID: 22385572. PMCID: PMC3338091.
Article
113. Polistina F, Di Natale G, Bonciarelli G, Ambrosino G, Frego M. 2014; Neoadjuvant strategies for pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 20:9374–9383. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9374. PMID: 25071332. PMCID: PMC4110569.
114. Nanda RH, El-Rayes B, Maithel SK, Landry J. 2015; Neoadjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer improves resectability. J Surg Oncol. 111:1028–1034. DOI: 10.1002/jso.23921. PMID: 26073887.
Article
115. Gemenetzis G, Groot VP, Blair AB, Laheru DA, Zheng L, Narang AK, et al. 2019; Survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection. Ann Surg. 270:340–347. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002753. PMID: 29596120. PMCID: PMC6985003.
Article
116. Murphy JE, Wo JY, Ryan DP, Clark JW, Jiang W, Yeap BY, et al. 2019; Total neoadjuvant therapy With FOLFIRINOX in combination with losartan followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 5:1020–1027. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0892. PMID: 31145418. PMCID: PMC6547247.
Article
117. Doi R, Imamura M, Hosotani R, Imaizumi T, Hatori T, Takasaki K, et al. 2008; Surgery versus radiochemotherapy for resectable locally invasive pancreatic cancer: final results of a randomized multi-institutional trial. Surg Today. 38:1021–1028. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-007-3745-8. PMID: 18958561.
Article
118. Gurusamy KS, Kumar S, Davidson BR, Fusai G. Resection versus other treatments for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 2:CD010244. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010244.pub2. PMID: 24578248.
Article
119. Hirono S, Kawai M, Okada KI, Miyazawa M, Shimizu A, Kitahata Y, et al. 2017; Mesenteric approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 1:208–218. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12013. PMID: 29863125. PMCID: PMC5881370.
Article
120. Wang M, Zhang H, Zhu F, Peng F, Wang X, Shen M, et al. 2017; Pancreaticoduodenectomy for borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer with a modified artery-first approach technique. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 16:215–221. DOI: 10.1016/S1499-3872(16)60171-6. PMID: 28381388.
Article
121. Kurosaki I, Minagawa M, Takano K, Takizawa K, Hatakeyama K. 2011; Left posterior approach to the superior mesenteric vascular pedicle in pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the pancreatic head. JOP. 12:220–229. PMID: 21546696.
122. Pędziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Małczak P, Major P, Wierdak M, Radkowiak D, et al. 2017; Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy-feasibility study of a modified 'artery first' approach to pancreatic head cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 402:917–923. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-017-1597-2. PMID: 28699023. PMCID: PMC5563330.
Article
123. Sabater L, Cugat E, Serrablo A, Suarez-Artacho G, Diez-Valladares L, Santoyo-Santoyo J, et al. 2019; Does the artery-first approach improve the rate of R0 resection in pancreatoduodenectomy?: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg. 270:738–746. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003535. PMID: 31498183.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr