Korean J Radiol.  2022 Mar;23(3):322-332. 10.3348/kjr.2021.0483.

Diagnostic Accuracy of CT for Evaluating Circumferential Resection Margin Status in Resectable or Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer: A Prospective Study Using Axially Sliced Surgical Pathologic Correlation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 2Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 3Department of Applied Bioengineering, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 5Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 6Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 7Department of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 8Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Abstract


Objective
CT plays a central role in determining the resectability of pancreatic cancer, which directs the use of neoadjuvant therapy. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CT in predicting circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer.
Materials and Methods
Seventy-seven patients who were scheduled for upfront surgery for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer were prospectively enrolled, and 75 patients (38 male and 37 female; mean age ± standard deviation, 68 ± 11 years) were finally analyzed. The CRM status was evaluated separately for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and posterior and superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV) margins. Three independent radiologists reviewed the preoperative CT images and evaluated the resection margin status. The reference standard for CRM status was pathologic examination of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens in an axial plane perpendicular to the axis of the second portion of the duodenum. The diagnostic accuracy of CT was assessed for overall CRM involvement, defined as involvement of the SMA or posterior margins (per-patient analysis), and involvement of each of the three resection margins (per-margin analysis). The data were pooled using a crossed random effects model.
Results
Forty patients had pathologically confirmed overall CRM involvement in pancreatic cancer, while CRM involvement was not seen in 35 patients. For overall CRM involvement, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 15% (95% confidence interval: 7%–49%) and 99% (96%–100%), respectively. For each of the resection margins, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 14% (9%–54%) and 99% (38%–100%) for the SMA margin, 12% (8%–46%) and 99% (97%–100%) for the posterior margin; and 37% (29%–53%) and 96% (31%–100%) for the SMV/PV margin, respectively.
Conclusion
CT showed very high specificity but low sensitivity in predicting pathological CRM involvement in pancreatic cancer.

Keyword

Carcinoma; pancreatic ductal; Margins of excision; Multidetector computed tomography; Neoadjuvant therapy; Sensitivity and specificity
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr