Clin Exp Emerg Med.  2021 Dec;8(4):289-295. 10.15441/ceem.20.145.

A comparison of scoring systems for predicting mortality and sepsis in the emergency department patients with a suspected infection

• Thodphetch M
• Chenthanakij B
• Wittayachamnankul B
• Sruamsiri K
• Tangsuwanaruk T

• KMID: 2523849
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.20.145

Abstract

Objective
We aimed to compare the modified National Early Warning Score (mNEWS), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, modified Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (mSIRS) score, and modified Search Out Severity (mSOS) score in predicting mortality and sepsis among patients suspected of first observed infections in the emergency department. The modified scores were created by removing variables for simplicity.
Methods
This was a prospective cohort study that enrolled adult patients presenting at the emergency department with signs and symptoms suggesting infection. The mNEWS, qSOFA score, mSIRS score, and mSOS score were calculated using triage data. The SOFA score was a reference standard for sepsis diagnosis. All patients were monitored for up to 30 days after the initial visit to measure each scoring system’s ability to predict 30-day mortality and sepsis.
Results
There were 260 patients included in the study. The 30-day mortality prediction with mNEWS ≥5 had the highest sensitivity (91.18%). The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the 30-day mortality prediction was mNEWS (0.607), followed by qSOFA (0.605), mSOS (0.550), and mSIRS (0.423). The sepsis prediction with mNEWS ≥5 had the highest sensitivity (96.48%). The highest AUC for the sepsis prediction was also mNEWS (0.685), followed by qSOFA (0.605), mSOS (0.480), and mSIRS (0.477).
Conclusion
mNEWS was an acceptable scoring system screening tool for predicting mortality and sepsis in patients with a suspected infection.

Keyword

Emergency service, hospital; Mortality; Clincal decision rule; Prognosis; Sepsis