Korean J Transplant.  2021 Jun;35(2):130-136. 10.4285/kjt.20.0056.

Recipient hepatectomy under total hepatic vascular exclusion to prevent hepatocellular carcinoma spread in living donor liver transplantation

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

We present a case of recipient hepatectomy under total hepatic vascular exclusion (THVE) and venovenous bypass for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in a patient with multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) closely located to the retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC). A 19-year-old male patient diagnosed with multiple HCCs underwent left lateral sectionectomy 14 months before and received four sessions of transarterial chemoembolization due to post-hepatectomy tumor recurrence. These pretransplant sequences implicated high risk of posttransplant HCC recurrence. However, LDLT was performed with expectation of prolonged survival. During recipient operation, the portal vein was transected and active venovenous bypass was performed. Supra- and infra-hepatic portions of the retrohepatic IVC were then clamped. Under THVE and portal vein bypass, recipient hepatectomy was meticulously performed. A modified right liver graft recovered from his brother was implanted according to standard procedures of LDLT. The patient recovered uneventfully from LDLT operation. However, multiple pulmonary metastasis occurred. The patient has been doing well for 12 months after LDLT, with administration of chemotherapeutic agents. Although early pulmonary metastasis occurred in this patient, we suggest that recipient hepatectomy under THVE and venovenous bypass can be a feasible technical option to cope with risk of iatrogenic tumor cell spread during LDLT operation.

Keyword

Hepatectomy; Tumor recurrence; Tumor cell spread; Inferior vena cava; Pulmonary metastasis

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A-D) Pretransplant dynamic computed tomography showing lipiodol uptake of multiple viable hepatocellular carcinomas.

  • Fig. 2 Intraoperative photographs of recipient hepatectomy. (A) The hepatoduodenal ligament is meticulously dissected, and then the right hepatic artery and the bile duct are transected. (B) The supra- and infra-hepatic portions of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) are encircled with vascular tourniquets. (C) The right portal vein is transected and portal flow is diverted through the active venovenous bypass connected to the internal jugular vein pathway. (D) Under total hepatic vascular exclusion and portal vein bypass, the caudate lobe is meticulously dissected from the retrohepatic IVC and the right liver is fully mobilized.

  • Fig. 3 Photographs of the explant liver showing multiple tumors with partial necrosis.

  • Fig. 4 Posttransplant liver dynamic computed tomography findings. The unusual findings of modified right liver graft implantation are visible at the image taken at 2 weeks (A) and 6 months (B) after the transplantation.

  • Fig. 5 Posttransplant chest dynamic computed tomography findings. (A) Multiple small nodules (arrow) are identified in the image taken at 4 months after the transplantation. (B) The number and size of lung nodules are increased (arrow) in the image taken at 9 months after the transplantation.


Reference

1. Mangus RS, Fridell JA, Vianna RM, Cooper AB, Jones DT, Tector AJ. 2008; Use of the piggyback hepatectomy technique in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplantation. 85:1496–9. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31816feec0. PMID: 18497692.
Article
2. Moon DB, Lee SG, Hwang S, Kim KH, Ahn CS, Ha TY, et al. 2013; No-touch en bloc right lobe living-donor liver transplantation with inferior vena cava replacement for hepatocellular carcinoma close to retrohepatic inferior vena cava: case report. Transplant Proc. 45:3135–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.08.052. PMID: 24157050.
Article
3. Matsuda H, Sadamori H, Shinoura S, Umeda Y, Yoshida R, Satoh D, et al. 2010; Aggressive combined resection of hepatic inferior vena cava, with replacement by a ringed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft, in living-donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 17:719–24. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-010-0287-z. PMID: 20425126.
Article
4. Smyrniotis VE, Kostopanagiotou GG, Gamaletsos EL, Vassiliou JG, Voros DC, Fotopoulos AC, et al. 2002; Total versus selective hepatic vascular exclusion in major liver resections. Am J Surg. 183:173–8. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00864-9.
Article
5. Azoulay D, Lim C, Salloum C, Andreani P, Maggi U, Bartelmaos T, et al. 2015; Complex liver resection using standard total vascular exclusion, venovenous bypass, and in situ hypothermic portal perfusion: an audit of 77 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 262:93–104. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000787. PMID: 24950284.
6. Choi JU, Hwang S, Chung IJ, Kang SH, Ahn CS, Moon DB, et al. 2020; Prolonged hepatic inflow occlusion to reduce bleeding during recipient hepatectomy in living donor liver transplantation. Korean J Transplant. 34:55–61.
7. Choi JU, Hwang S, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Ha TY, Kim KH, et al. 2019; Prolonged occlusion of the hepatoduodenal ligament to reduce risk of bleeding and tumor spread during recipient hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 23:61–4. DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.1.61. PMID: 30863809. PMCID: PMC6405371.
Article
8. Hwang S, Song GW, Ahn CS, Kim KH, Moon DB, Ha TY, et al. 2020; Nov. 11. Salvage living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after hepatectomy: quantitative prediction using ADV score. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. [Epub]. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/jhbp.863. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.863. PMID: 33175453.
Article
9. Jabir MA, Hamza HM, Fakhry H, Amira G, Hatano E, Uemoto S. 2017; Anterior versus conventional approach for resection of large right lobe hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Cancer. 48:25–30. DOI: 10.1007/s12029-016-9865-x. PMID: 27506210.
Article
10. Hwang S, Lee SG, Ahn CS, Kim KH, Moon DB, Ha TY, et al. 2007; Small-sized liver graft does not increase the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 39:1526–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.03.066. PMID: 17580180.
Article
11. Liang W, Wu L, Ling X, Schroder PM, Ju W, Wang D, et al. 2012; Living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Liver Transpl. 18:1226–36. DOI: 10.1002/lt.23490. PMID: 22685095.
Article
12. Yoon YI, Lee SG, Moon DB, Ahn CS, Hwang S, Kim KH, et al. 2019; Surgical techniques and long-term outcomes of living-donor liver transplantation with inferior vena cava replacement using atriocaval synthetic interposition graft for Budd-Chiari syndrome. Ann Surg. 269:e43–5. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002847. PMID: 30080720.
Article
13. Yoon YI, Lee SG. 2019; Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an Asian perspective. Dig Dis Sci. 64:993–1000. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05551-4. PMID: 30895483.
Article
14. Li H, Yang Z, Tian F. 2019; Clinical characteristics and risk factors for sinistral portal hypertension associated with moderate and severe acute pancreatitis: a seven-year single-center retrospective study. Med Sci Monit. 25:5969–76. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.916192. PMID: 31400275. PMCID: PMC6699198.
Article
15. Reddy K, Mallett S, Peachey T. 2005; Venovenous bypass in orthotopic liver transplantation: time for a rethink? Liver Transpl. 11:741–9. DOI: 10.1002/lt.20482. PMID: 15973707.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr