J Korean Med Sci.  2021 May;36(21):e158. 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e158.

Positivity of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies among Korean Healthy Healthcare Workers 1 and 2 Weeks after Second Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech Vaccination

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

The antibody titer of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was observed in 289 healthy healthcare workers who had completed the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. Antibody tests were performed using both the automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) and the chromatographic lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA). All subjects had antibodies against the receptor binding domain of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 only one week after completing the vaccination, and the antibody titer became significantly higher after another week (P < 0.001). Since there was a large amount of antibody formation within two weeks after completion of vaccination, the less sensitive method, LFIA, also showed high sensitivity. There was no significant difference between whole blood and serum in detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after vaccination. This is an early study of vaccinations among Koreans and is expected to contribute to the establishment of national guidelines on COVID-19 vaccination.

Keyword

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; mRNA Vaccine; Korean; Antibody Formation; Immunoassay

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Results of the automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay (Elecsys Anti-S assay) of the first (1 week after second dose Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination) and second sampling (2 weeks after second dose Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination). This scatter plot graph shows the antibody titer of SARS-CoV-2.SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.


Cited by  2 articles

Comparison of Antibody Response Elicited by ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine
Yu Min Kang, Dohsik Minn, Jaegyun Lim, Ki-Deok Lee, Dong Ho Jo, Kang-Won Choe, Moon Jung Kim, Jong Min Kim, Kwang Nam Kim
J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(46):e311.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e311.

Evaluation of COVID-19 Biokit IgG/IgM Clinical Effectiveness in COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals
Min Ji Kim, HwaYeon Sun, Byung Wook Yoo
Korean J Health Promot. 2022;22(2):62-67.    doi: 10.15384/kjhp.2022.22.2.62.


Reference

1. World Health Organization. The coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. Updated 2021. Accessed May 2, 2021. https://covid19.who.int/.
2. World Health Organization. The COVID-19 candidate vaccine landscape and tracker. Updated 2021. Accessed May 2, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines.
3. Krammer F. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. Nature. 2020; 586(7830):516–527. PMID: 32967006.
Article
4. Dong Y, Dai T, Wei Y, Zhang L, Zheng M, Zhou F. A systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020; 5(1):237. PMID: 33051445.
Article
5. Dai L, Gao GF. Viral targets for vaccines against COVID-19. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021; 21(2):73–82. PMID: 33340022.
Article
6. Lan J, Ge J, Yu J, Shan S, Zhou H, Fan S, et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature. 2020; 581(7807):215–220. PMID: 32225176.
Article
7. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020; 579(7798):270–273. PMID: 32015507.
8. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Drug information website. Updated 2021. Accessed May 2, 2021. https://nedrug.mfds.go.kr/index.
9. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency. COVID-19 vaccine dashboard. Updated 2021. Accessed May 2, 2021. https://ncv.kdca.go.kr/.
10. Elecsys®. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S. Insert (material number 09289267190 and 09289275190). Updated 2020. Accessed May 2, 2021. https://diagnostics.roche.com/global/en/products/params/elecsys-anti-sars-cov-2-s.html.
11. Elecsys®. Anti-SARS-CoV-2. Insert (material numbers 09203095190 and 09203079190). Updated 2020. Accessed May 2, 2021. https://diagnostics.roche.com/global/en/products/params/elecsys-anti-sars-cov-2.html.
12. Aydin S. A short history, principles, and types of ELISA, and our laboratory experience with peptide/protein analyses using ELISA. Peptides. 2015; 72:4–15. PMID: 25908411.
Article
13. Engvall E. The ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clin Chem. 2010; 56(2):319–320. PMID: 19850633.
Article
14. Nicol T, Lefeuvre C, Serri O, Pivert A, Joubaud F, Dubée V, et al. Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 through the evaluation of three immunoassays: two automated immunoassays (Euroimmun and Abbott) and one rapid lateral flow immunoassay (NG Biotech). J Clin Virol. 2020; 129:104511. PMID: 32593133.
Article
15. Lassaunière R, Frische A, Harboe ZB, Nielsen ACY, Fomsgaard A, Krogfelt KA, et al. Evaluation of nine commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays. medRxiv. Forthcoming. 2020; DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.09.20056325.
Article
16. Serrano MM, Rodríguez DN, Palop NT, Arenas RO, Córdoba MM, Mochón MD, et al. Comparison of commercial lateral flow immunoassays and ELISA for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection. J Clin Virol. 2020; 129:104529. PMID: 32659710.
Article
17. Shincy MR, Govindan V, Sudhakar HH, Venkatesha VT, Padmapriya K, Ravikumar KL. Comparison of performance characteristics between lateral flow, ELISA and electrochemiluminescence immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthcare workers. medRxiv. Forthcoming. 2021; DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.29.21256260.
Article
18. Kohmer N, Westhaus S, Rühl C, Ciesek S, Rabenau HF. Brief clinical evaluation of six high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody assays. J Clin Virol. 2020; 129:104480. PMID: 32505777.
Article
19. Barnes CO, Jette CA, Abernathy ME, Dam KA, Esswein SR, Gristick HB, et al. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody structures inform therapeutic strategies. Nature. 2020; 588(7839):682–687. PMID: 33045718.
Article
20. Zhang LX, Miao SY, Qin ZH, Wu JP, Chen HY, Sun HB, et al. Preliminary analysis of B- and T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2. Mol Diagn Ther. 2020; 24(5):601–609. PMID: 32710269.
Article
21. Sahin U, Muik A, Derhovanessian E, Vogler I, Kranz LM, Vormehr M, et al. COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and TH1 T cell responses. Nature. 2020; 586(7830):594–599. PMID: 32998157.
22. Criscuolo E, Diotti RA, Strollo M, Rolla S, Ambrosi A, Locatelli M, et al. Weak correlation between antibody titers and neutralizing activity in sera from SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects. J Med Virol. 2021; 93(4):2160–2167. PMID: 33064340.
Article
23. Mulligan MJ, Lyke KE, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Phase I/II study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults. Nature. 2020; 586(7830):589–593. PMID: 32785213.
24. Widge AT, Rouphael NG, Jackson LA, Anderson EJ, Roberts PC, Makhene M, et al. Durability of responses after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(1):80–82. PMID: 33270381.
Article
25. Doria-Rose N, Suthar MS, Makowski M, O'Connell S, McDermott AB, Flach B, et al. Antibody persistence through 6 months after the second dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine for Covid-19. N Engl J Med. Forthcoming. 2021; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2103916.
Article
26. Goel RR, Apostolidis SA, Painter MM, Mathew D, Pattekar A, Kuthuru O, et al. Distinct antibody and memory B cell responses in SARS-CoV-2 naïve and recovered individuals following mRNA vaccination. Sci Immunol. 2021; 6(58):eabi6950. PMID: 33858945.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr