2. Alpert JM, McCarty LP, Bach BR Jr. 2008; The direct posterior approach to the knee: surgical and anatomic approach. J Knee Surg. 21:44–9. DOI:
10.1055/s-0030-1247791. PMID:
18300671.
Article
4. Landis JR, Koch GG. 1977; The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33:159–74. DOI:
10.2307/2529310. PMID:
843571.
Article
5. Chen H, Wu L. 2015; Surgical options for posterior tibial plateau fracture. Int J Clin Exp Med. 8:21421–7. PMID:
26885086. PMCID:
PMC4723931.
6. Thi C, Van Huy N, Nguyen NC, Thanh TH. 2018; Applied anatomy of common peroneal nerve: a cadaveric study. Int J Med Pharm. 6:6–10. DOI:
10.15640/ijmp.v6n1a2.
Article
7. Hyland S, Sinkler MA, Varacallo M. 2020. Anatomy, bony pelvis and lower limb, popliteal region. StatPearls Publishing;Treasure Island:
9. Sora MC, Dresenkamp J, Gabriel A, Matusz P, Wengert GJ, Bartl R. 2015; The relationship of neurovascular structures to the posterior medial aspect of the knee: an anatomic study using plastinated cross-sections. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 56:1035–41. PMID:
26662136.
10. Byun S, Gordon J, Morris S, Jacob T, Pather N. 2019; A computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging study of the variations of the sciatic nerve branches of the pediatric knee: implications for peripheral nerve blockade. Clin Anat. 32:836–50. DOI:
10.1002/ca.23412. PMID:
31125132.
Article
11. Aktan Ikiz ZA, Uçerler H, Bilge O. 2005; The anatomic features of the sural nerve with an emphasis on its clinical importance. Foot Ankle Int. 26:560–7. DOI:
10.1177/107110070502600712. PMID:
16045849.
14. Hafez MA, Sheikhedrees SM, Saweeres ES. 2016; Anthropometry of Arabian arthritic knees: comparison to other ethnic groups and implant dimensions. J Arthroplasty. 31:1109–16. DOI:
10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.017. PMID:
26791047.
Article
15. Miyatake N, Sugita T, Aizawa T, Sasaki A, Maeda I, Kamimura M, Fujisawa H, Takahashi A. 2016; Comparison of intraoperative anthropometric measurements of the proximal tibia and tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 21:635–9. DOI:
10.1016/j.jos.2016.06.003. PMID:
27380729.
Article
17. Hohmann E, Keough N, Glatt V, Tetsworth K, Putz R, Imhoff A. 2019; The mechanical properties of fresh versus fresh/frozen and preserved (thiel and formalin) long head of biceps tendons: a cadaveric investigation. Ann Anat. 221:186–91. DOI:
10.1016/j.aanat.2018.05.002. PMID:
29879483.
Article
18. Eisma R, Lamb C, Soames RW. 2013; From formalin to thiel embalming: what changes? One anatomy department's experiences. Clin Anat. 26:564–71. DOI:
10.1002/ca.22222. PMID:
23408386.
Article
19. Kennel L, Martin DMA, Shaw H, Wilkinson T. 2018; Learning anatomy through thiel- vs. formalin-embalmed cadavers: student perceptions of embalming methods and effect on functional anatomy knowledge. Anat Sci Educ. 11:166–74. DOI:
10.1002/ase.1715. PMID:
28719722.
Article