Health Policy Manag.  2020 Dec;30(4):493-504. 10.4332/KJHPA.2020.30.4.493.

Does the Obesity Paradox Exist in Cognitive Function?: Evidence from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing, 2006–2016

Affiliations
  • 1AbbVie Korea Ltd., Seoul, Korea
  • 2Departments of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Departments Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Departments of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
There have been many studies on the associations between body mass index (BMI) and cognitive function. However, no study has ever compared the associations across the methods of categorizing BMI. In this study, we aimed to fill the gap in the previous studies and examine whether the obesity paradox is valid in the risk of cognitive function.
Methods
Of the 10,254 people aged 45 and older from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing from 2006 to 2016, 8,970 people were finalized as the study population. The dependent variable was whether a person has a normal cognitive function or not, and the independent variables of interest were BMI categorized by the World Health Organization Western Pacific Regional Office (WHO-WPRO) method, the WHO method, and a 10-group method. Covariates included sociodemographic factors, health behavior factors, and health status factors. A generalized linear mixed model analysis with a logit link was used.
Results
In the adjusted model with all covariates, first, in the case of BMI categories of the WHO-WPRO method, underweight (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–1.17), overweight (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.35–1.36), and obese (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.33–1.34) groups were more likely to have a normal cognitive function than a normal-weight group. Next, in the case of BMI categories of the WHO method, compared to a normal-weight group, underweight (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.14–1.16) and overweight (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.06–1.07) groups were more likely to have a normal cognitive function; however, obese (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.61–0.63) group was less likely to have it. Lastly, in the case of the 10-group method, as BMI increased, the likelihood to have a normal cognitive function changed like a wave, reaching a global top at group-7 (26.5 kg/㎡ ≤ BMI <28.0 kg/㎡ ).
Conclusion
The associations between BMI and cognitive function differed according to how BMI was categorized among people aged 45 and older in Korea, which suggests that cognitive function may be positively associated with BMI in some categories of BMI but negatively in its other categories. Health policies to reduce cognitive impairment need to consider this association between BMI and cognitive function.

Keyword

Obesity paradox; Body mass index; Obesity; Cognitive dysfunction; Cognition; Middle aged and older people; Longitudinal studies; Republic of Korea
Full Text Links
  • HPM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr