Prog Med Phys.
2020 Sep;31(S1):S65.
Development of Water-Filled Phantom and Comparision Film Dosimetry for Five Phantoms in Gamma Knife
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Accelerator Science, Korea University, Sejong , Korea
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- 3Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
Abstract
- Purpose
The objective of this study is to investigate the scattering effect of the plastic phantoms by determining FWHM and penumbra from the measurement of absorbed dose profile in Gamma Knife radiosurgery facility using EBT3 GafChromic film and three plastic phantoms and one water-filled spherical phantom.
Methods
A spherical shell water-filled phantom with the shell thickness a radius of 4 mm and, a spherical shape Polystyrene plastic phantom and PMMA plastic phantom were developed. The radius of each phantom was determined to be the same as the reference depth of water, 8 g/cm2 , recommended in IAEA TRS-483. From the element analysis of each material followed by electron density calculation, the equivalent water depth (EWD) of Polystyrene corresponding to 8 g/cm2 water depth was 7.88 cm and that of PMMA was 6.93 cm. Inner phantoms that hold the EBT3 films were designed and produced.
A commercial Solid Water Phantom was also used for the measurement of absorbed dose profile. The absorbed dose rate to water was measured with two ionization chambers PTW31010 and Exradin A16. The irradiated films were scanned in TIFF image format using a high-resolution flatbed scanner (EPSON 10000XL) with a transparency unit. The scanned images then were analyzed using appropriate software (Doselab 6.80 Version) to convert the image data into optical density distribution of the film and then to convert the optical density into absorbed energy on the film. For each phantom, the absorbed dose profile was obtained along each axis (X-, Y-, and Z-). FWHM and penumbra (≤d20 –d80 >, where d20 is the distance from the mechanical center to a position at which the intensity is 20% of the center intensity, and d 80 is to a position of 80% for the±direction of each coordinate) for each plastic phantom were determined and compared with those of the spherical shell water-filled phantom to obtain the scattering effect of the plastic phantom.
Results
Comparison of the absorbed dose profile of 20% in the maximum between the plastic phantoms and the Waterfilled phantom showed that Solid Water phantom was 3.1%, the Polystyrene was 3.7%, and the PMMA phantom was 5.8% higher than Water-filled phantom. It is the result of x-axis, and the repeated of experiments on y-axis and z-axis showed similar differences. As expected result using the Water-filled phantom, the scattering effect was less than other plastic phantoms.
Conclusions
The experiments using Water-filled phantom showed more accurate value than the result of using the plastic phantoms. In the future, more efficient and various phantom will be developed.