Korean J Pain.  2020 Jan;33(1):3-12. 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.3.

Pregabalin and gabapentin in neuropathic pain management after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 2Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 3Department of Health Administration and Public Health, John G. Rangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • 4Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) has a significant negative impact on the patients’ quality of life. The objective of this systematic review is to examine the safety and efficacy of pregabalin (PGB) and gabapentin (GBP) in the treatment of neuropathic pain due to SCI. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and the Web of Science were searched up to December 2018. The reference lists of key and review studies were reviewed for additional citations. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tools for assessing the risk of bias. A meta-analysis was performed for primary and secondary outcomes. Eight studies were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis of PGB vs. placebo showed that PGB was effective for neuropathic pain (standardized mean difference [SMD] = –0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –0.78, –0.01), anxiety (MD = –0.68; 95% CI:–0.77, –0.59), depression (mean difference [MD] = –0.99; 95% CI: –1.08, –0.89), and sleep interference (MD = –1.08; 95% CI: –1.13, –1.02). Also, GBP was more effective than a placebo for reducing pain. No significant difference was observed between the efficacy of the two drugs (MD = –0.37; 95% CI: –1.67, 0.93). There was no significant difference between the two drugs for discontinuation due to adverse events (risk ratio = 3.00; 95% CI: 0.81, 11.15). PGB and GBP were effective vs. placebos in decreasing neuropathic pain after SCI. Also, there was no significant difference between the two drugs for decreasing pain and adverse events.

Keyword

Anxiety; Depression; Gabapentin; Meta-Analysis; Neuralgia; Pain; Pregabalin; Spinal Cord Injuries; Systematic Review

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Study flow diagram preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA).

  • Fig. 2 Risk of bias.

  • Fig. 3 Pooled mean difference (MD) of pregabalin (PGB) vs. gabapentin (GBP) for pain outcome. There was no significant difference between two drugs for reducing pain. SD: standard deviation, CI: confidence interval, df: degree of freedom.

  • Fig. 4 Pooled mean difference (MD) of pregabalin (PGB) vs. placebo (PBO) for outcomes of pain (A), anxiety (B), depression (C), and sleep interference (D). PGB is effective vs. PBO for all outcomes. SD: standard deviation, CI: confidence interval, df: degree of freedom.

  • Fig. 5 Pooled risk ratio (RR) of pregabalin (PGB) vs. gabapentin (GBP) for adverse events (AEs). There was no significant difference between two drugs for AEs. CI: confidence interval, df: degree of freedom.

  • Fig. 6 Pooled risk ratio (RR) of pregabalin (PGB) vs. placebo (PBO) for adverse events. There was no significant difference between PGB and PBO for discontinuation, somnolence, and peripheral edema. The incidence of dizziness was higher for PGB. CI: confidence interval, df: degree of freedom.


Cited by  1 articles

Transcranial direct current stimulation for spinal cord injury-associated neuropathic pain
Caixia Li, Sukunya Jirachaipitak, Paul Wrigley, Hua Xu, Pramote Euasobhon
Korean J Pain. 2021;34(2):156-164.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.2.156.


Reference

1. Kamble SV, Motlekar SA, D’souza LL, Kudrigikar VN, Rao SE. Low doses of amitriptyline, pregabalin, and gabapentin are preferred for management of neuropathic pain in India: is there a need for revisiting dosing recommendations? Korean J Pain. 2017; 30:183–91. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2017.30.3.183. PMID: 28757918. PMCID: 5532525.
Article
2. Werhagen L, Budh CN, Hultling C, Molander C. Neuropathic pain after traumatic spinal cord injury--relations to gender, spinal level, completeness, and age at the time of injury. Spinal Cord. 2004; 42:665–73. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101641. PMID: 15289801.
Article
3. Castro MM, Daltro C. Sleep patterns and symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with chronic pain. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2009; 67:25–8. DOI: 10.1590/S0004-282X2009000100007. PMID: 19330205.
Article
4. Gore M, Brandenburg NA, Dukes E, Hoffman DL, Tai KS, Stacey B. Pain severity in diabetic peripheral neuropathy is associated with patient functioning, symptom levels of anxiety and depression, and sleep. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005; 30:374–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.04.009. PMID: 16256902.
Article
5. Gormsen L, Rosenberg R, Bach FW, Jensen TS. Depression, anxiety, health-related quality of life and pain in patients with chronic fibromyalgia and neuropathic pain. Eur J Pain. 2010; 14:127.e1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.03.010. PMID: 19473857.
Article
6. McDermott AM, Toelle TR, Rowbotham DJ, Schaefer CP, Dukes EM. The burden of neuropathic pain: results from a cross-sectional survey. Eur J Pain. 2006; 10:127–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.01.014. PMID: 16310716.
Article
7. Gustorff B, Dorner T, Likar R, Grisold W, Lawrence K, Schwarz F, et al. Prevalence of self-reported neuropathic pain and impact on quality of life: a prospective representative survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008; 52:132–6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01486.x. PMID: 17976220.
Article
8. Hassanijirdehi M, Khak M, Afshari-Mirak S, Holakouie-Naieni K, Saadat S, Taheri T, et al. Evaluation of pain and its effect on quality of life and functioning in men with spinal cord injury. Korean J Pain. 2015; 28:129–36. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.129. PMID: 25852835. PMCID: 4387458.
Article
9. Lude P, Kennedy P, Elfström ML, Ballert CS. Quality of life in and after spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a longitudinal multicenter study. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014; 20:197–207. DOI: 10.1310/sci2003-197. PMID: 25484566. PMCID: 4257147.
Article
10. Dermanovic Dobrota V, Hrabac P, Skegro D, Smiljanic R, Dobrota S, Prkacin I, et al. The impact of neuropathic pain and other comorbidities on the quality of life in patients with diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014; 12:171. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-014-0171-7. PMID: 25468384. PMCID: 4264315.
Article
11. Geyh S, Ballert C, Sinnott A, Charlifue S, Catz A, D’Andrea Greve JM, et al. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a comparison across six countries. Spinal Cord. 2013; 51:322–6. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2012.128. PMID: 23147129.
Article
12. Leem YJ, Joh JW, Joeng KW, Suh JH, Shin JW, Leem JG. Central pain from excitotoxic spinal cord injury induced by intraspinal NMDA injection: a pilot study. Korean J Pain. 2010; 23:109–15. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2010.23.2.109. PMID: 20556212. PMCID: 2886245.
Article
13. Wollaars MM, Post MW, van Asbeck FW, Brand N. Spinal cord injury pain: the influence of psychologic factors and impact on quality of life. Clin J Pain. 2007; 23:383–91. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31804463e5. PMID: 17515736.
Article
14. Smith BH, Torrance N, Bennett MI, Lee AJ. Health and quality of life associated with chronic pain of predominantly neuropathic origin in the community. Clin J Pain. 2007; 23:143–9. DOI: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000210956.31997.89. PMID: 17237663.
Article
15. Gálvez R, Marsal C, Vidal J, Ruiz M, Rejas J. Cross-sectional evaluation of patient functioning and health-related quality of life in patients with neuropathic pain under standard care conditions. Eur J Pain. 2007; 11:244–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.02.002. PMID: 16563819.
Article
16. Davies M, Brophy S, Williams R, Taylor A. The prevalence, severity, and impact of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29:1518–22. DOI: 10.2337/dc05-2228. PMID: 16801572.
Article
17. Teasell RW, Mehta S, Aubut JA, Foulon B, Wolfe DL, Hsieh JT, et al. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Research Team. A systematic review of pharmacologic treatments of pain after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91:816–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.022. PMID: 20434623. PMCID: 3218077.
Article
18. DeFrates S, Cook AM. Pharmacologic treatment of neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. Orthopedics. 2011; 34:203. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20110124-19. PMID: 21410102.
Article
19. Hagen EM, Rekand T. Management of neuropathic pain associated with spinal cord injury. Pain Ther. 2015; 4:51–65. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-015-0033-y. PMID: 25744501. PMCID: 4470971.
Article
20. Rowbotham M, Harden N, Stacey B, Bernstein P, Magnus-Miller L. Gabapentin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998; 280:1837–42. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.21.1837. PMID: 9846778.
Article
21. Rice AS, Maton S. Postherpetic Neuralgia Study Group. Gabapentin in postherpetic neuralgia: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study. Pain. 2001; 94:215–24. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00407-9. PMID: 11690735.
Article
22. Sabatowski R, Gálvez R, Cherry DA, Jacquot F, Vincent E, Maisonobe P, et al. 1008-045 Study Group. Pregabalin reduces pain and improves sleep and mood disturbances in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia: results of a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Pain. 2004; 109:26–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.01.001. PMID: 15082123.
Article
23. van Seventer R, Feister HA, Young JP Jr, Stoker M, Versavel M, Rigaudy L. Efficacy and tolerability of twice-daily pregabalin for treating pain and related sleep interference in postherpetic neuralgia: a 13-week, randomized trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006; 22:375–84. DOI: 10.1185/030079906X80404. PMID: 16466610.
Article
24. Moon DE, Lee DI, Lee SC, Song SO, Yoon DM, Yoon MH, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of pregabalin using a flexible, optimized dose schedule in Korean patients with peripheral neuropathic pain: a 10-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Clin Ther. 2010; 32:2370–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.014. PMID: 21353106.
Article
25. Xochilcal-Morales M, Castro EM, Guajardo-Rosas J, Obregón TN, Acevedo JC, Chucan JM, et al. A prospective, open-label, multicentre study of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain in Latin America. Int J Clin Pract. 2010; 64:1301–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02389.x. PMID: 20487048.
Article
26. Guan Y, Ding X, Cheng Y, Fan D, Tan L, Wang Y, et al. Efficacy of pregabalin for peripheral neuropathic pain: results of an 8-week, flexible-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in China. Clin Ther. 2011; 33:159–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.02.007. PMID: 21444113.
Article
27. Backonja M, Beydoun A, Edwards KR, Schwartz SL, Fonseca V, Hes M, et al. Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998; 280:1831–6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.21.1831. PMID: 9846777.
Article
28. Sandercock D, Cramer M, Wu J, Chiang YK, Biton V, Heritier M. Gabapentin extended release for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: efficacy and tolerability in a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32:e20. DOI: 10.2337/dc08-1450. PMID: 19171730. PMCID: 6905491.
29. Tölle T, Freynhagen R, Versavel M, Trostmann U, Young JP Jr. Pregabalin for relief of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind study. Eur J Pain. 2008; 12:203–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.05.003. PMID: 17631400.
Article
30. Guay DR. Pregabalin in neuropathic pain: a more “pharmaceutically elegant” gabapentin? Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2005; 3:274–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2005.12.008.
Article
31. Turner JA, Cardenas DD, Warms CA, McClellan CB. Chronic pain associated with spinal cord injuries: a community survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82:501–9. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.21855. PMID: 11295011.
Article
32. Tzellos TG, Papazisis G, Amaniti E, Kouvelas D. Efficacy of pregabalin and gabapentin for neuropathic pain in spinal-cord injury: an evidence-based evaluation of the literature. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 64:851–8. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-008-0523-5. PMID: 18607580.
Article
33. Attal N, Mazaltarine G, Perrouin-Verbe B, Albert T. SOFMER French Society for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Chronic neuropathic pain management in spinal cord injury patients. What is the efficacy of pharmacological treatments with a general mode of administration? (oral, transdermal, intravenous). Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009; 52:124–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2008.12.011. PMID: 19909703.
Article
34. Snedecor SJ, Sudharshan L, Cappelleri JC, Sadosky A, Desai P, Jalundhwala YJ, et al. Systematic review and comparison of pharmacologic therapies for neuropathic pain associated with spinal cord injury. J Pain Res. 2013; 6:539–47. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S45966. PMID: 23874121. PMCID: 3712802.
Article
35. Guy S, Mehta S, Leff L, Teasell R, Loh E. Anticonvulsant medication use for the management of pain following spinal cord injury: systematic review and effectiveness analysis. Spinal Cord. 2014; 52:89–96. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2013.146. PMID: 24296804.
Article
36. Mehta S, McIntyre A, Dijkers M, Loh E, Teasell RW. Gabapentinoids are effective in decreasing neuropathic pain and other secondary outcomes after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95:2180–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.010. PMID: 24992021.
Article
37. Song F, Altman DG, Glenny AM, Deeks JJ. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 326:472. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7387.472. PMID: 12609941. PMCID: 150178.
Article
38. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151:264–9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. PMID: 19622511.
Article
39. Tai Q, Kirshblum S, Chen B, Millis S, Johnston M, DeLisa JA. Gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. J Spinal Cord Med. 2002; 25:100–5. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2002.11753609. PMID: 12137213.
Article
40. Levendoglu F, Ogün CO, Ozerbil O, Ogün TC, Ugurlu H. Gabapentin is a first line drug for the treatment of neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29:743–51. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000112068.16108.3A. PMID: 15087796.
Article
41. Siddall PJ, Cousins MJ, Otte A, Griesing T, Chambers R, Murphy TK. Pregabalin in central neuropathic pain associated with spinal cord injury: a placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 2006; 67:1792–800. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000244422.45278.ff. PMID: 17130411.
Article
42. Rintala DH, Holmes SA, Courtade D, Fiess RN, Tastard LV, Loubser PG. Comparison of the effectiveness of amitriptyline and gabapentin on chronic neuropathic pain in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88:1547–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.038. PMID: 18047869.
Article
43. Vranken JH, Dijkgraaf MG, Kruis MR, van der Vegt MH, Hollmann MW, Heesen M. Pregabalin in patients with central neuropathic pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a flexible-dose regimen. Pain. 2008; 136:150–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.06.033. PMID: 17703885.
Article
44. Cardenas DD, Nieshoff EC, Suda K, Goto S, Sanin L, Kaneko T, et al. A randomized trial of pregabalin in patients with neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury. Neurology. 2013; 80:533–9. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318281546b. PMID: 23345639. PMCID: 3589291.
Article
45. Kaydok E, Levendoglu F, Ozerbil MO, Karahan AY. Comparison of the efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin for neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a crossover study. Acta Med Mediterranea. 2014; 30:1343.
46. Yilmaz B, Yaşar E, Köroğlu Omaç Ö, Göktepe AS, Tan AK. Gabapentin vs. pregabalin for the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a crossover study. Turk J Phys Med Rehab. 2014; 61:1–5. DOI: 10.5152/tftrd.2015.79069.
Article
47. Ghosh AK, Ghosh A, Kundu A, Das AK, Bhattacharya KB. Comparative study of efficacy and safety of pregabalin and gabapentin in neuropathic pain. Asian J Pharm Life Sci. 2012; 2:64–71.
48. Donegan S, Williamson P, Gamble C, Tudur-Smith C. Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality. PLoS One. 2010; 5:e11054. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011054. PMID: 21085712. PMCID: 2978085.
Article
49. Dworkin RH, O’Connor AB, Backonja M, Farrar JT, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS, et al. Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: evidence-based recommendations. Pain. 2007; 132:237–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.033. PMID: 17920770.
Article
50. Putzke JD, Richards JS, Kezar L, Hicken BL, Ness TJ. Long-term use of gabapentin for treatment of pain after traumatic spinal cord injury. Clin J Pain. 2002; 18:116–21. DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200203000-00007. PMID: 11882775.
Article
51. To TP, Lim TC, Hill ST, Frauman AG, Cooper N, Kirsa SW, et al. Gabapentin for neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2002; 40:282–5. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101300. PMID: 12037709.
Article
52. Ahn SH, Park HW, Lee BS, Moon HW, Jang SH, Sakong J, et al. Gabapentin effect on neuropathic pain compared among patients with spinal cord injury and different durations of symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28:341–6. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000048464.57011.00. PMID: 12590206.
Article
53. Song F, Loke YK, Walsh T, Glenny AM, Eastwood AJ, Altman DG. Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews. BMJ. 2009; 338:b1147. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b1147. PMID: 19346285. PMCID: 2665205.
Article
54. Onouchi K, Koga H, Yokoyama K, Yoshiyama T. An open-label, long-term study examining the safety and tolerability of pregabalin in Japanese patients with central neuropathic pain. J Pain Res. 2014; 7:439–47. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S63028. PMID: 25114584. PMCID: 4122555.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr