Nutr Res Pract.  2020 Aug;14(4):299-308. 10.4162/nrp.2020.14.4.299.

Effect of probiotics Lactobacillus paracasei GKS6, L. plantarum GKM3, and L. rhamnosus GKLC1 on alleviating alcohol-induced alcoholic liver disease in a mouse model

Affiliations
  • 1Biotech Research Institute, Grape King Bio Ltd, Taoyuan 32542, Taiwan
  • 2Institute of Food Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
  • 3Department of Food Science, Nutrition and Nutraceutical Biotechnology, Shih Chien University, Taipei 10462, Taiwan
  • 4Department of Bioscience Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 32023, Taiwan

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
Heavy alcohol consumption causes the development of alcoholic liver disease (ALD), a neglected but important public health problem. Many studies have pointed out that probiotics could improve gut health, which is also considered to be a cause of ALD. Therefore, this study screened the probiotics, Lactobacillus casei GKC1 (GKC1), L. fermentum GKF3 (GKF3), Bifidobacterium lactis GKK2 (GKK2), L. rhamnosus GKLC1 (GKLC1), L. paracasei GKS6 (GKS6), and L. plantarum GKM3 (GKM3), for their potential benefits in alleviating ALD for applications to disease prevention.
SUBJECTS/METHODS
C57BL/6N mice were divided into 8 groups (n = 6 in each): normal control, positive control (alcohol-diet fed), and treatments of feeding probiotics GKC1, GKF3, GKK2, GKLC1, GKS6, and GKM3 under an oral dose 0.82 g/kg B.W. per day by oral gavage. The experiment was conducted for 8 weeks, and the concentrations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase, triglyceride (TG), and total cholesterol (TC) in mice were measured. The glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), and histology were analyzed after sacrifice.
RESULTS
The results showed a decrease in the serum ALT, liver TG, and liver TC levels in the GKS6, GKM3, and GKLC1 groups compared to the positive control. In addition, the decreasing GSH and CAT levels were inhibited in the GKS6 and GKM3 groups. The histopathological results showed that all probiotics could reduce the accumulation of liver fat. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in GKLC1 with lower stomach damage compared to the alcohol-fed mice without any addition of probiotics.
CONCLUSIONS
GKLC1, GKS6, and GKM3 can be used as supplements for alleviating the development of ALD.

Keyword

Alanine transaminase; catalase, gastrointestinal tract; glutathione; fatty liver

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Results of AST (A) and ALT (B) analysis at week 8. The results are expressed as mean ± SD. An unpaired t-test was applied (n = 6).AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; GKLC1, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GKLC1; GKM3, Lactobacillus plantarum GKM3; GKS6, Lactobacillus paracasei GKS6.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared with positive control.

  • Fig. 2 Effect of probiotics GKLC1, GKM3, and GKS6 on the change in the serum TG (A) and TC (B) levels in ethanol-fed C57BL/6 mice at the 8th week. Each value is represented as the mean ± SD (n = 6).TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; GKLC1, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GKLC1; GKS6, Lactobacillus paracasei GKS6; GKM3, Lactobacillus plantarum GKM3.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 when compared to the positive control (Duncan's multiple range test).

  • Fig. 3 Effects of probiotics GKLC1, GKM3, and GKS6 on liver TG and TC in ethanol-fed C57BL/6 mice. Each value is represented as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Duncan's multiple range test was applied.TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; GKS6, Lactobacillus paracasei GKS6; GKM3, Lactobacillus plantarum GKM3; GKLC1, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GKLC1.*P < 0.05, †P < 0.01, ‡P < 0.05, §P < 0.01 compared to the positive control.

  • Fig. 4 Effect of probiotics GKLC1, GKM3, and GKS6 on the GSH (A) and CAT (B) activities in the liver of ethanol-fed C57BL/6 mice. Each value is represented as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Duncan's multiple range test was applied.GSH, glutathione; CAT, catalase; GKLC1, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GKLC1; GKM3, Lactobacillus plantarum GKM3; GKS6, Lactobacillus paracasei GKS6.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 when compared to the positive control.

  • Fig. 5 (A) Histopathological score in the liver fat, leaky gut, and stomach of the ethanol-fed C57BL/6 mice with supplements of probiotics GKLC1, GKM3, and GKS6, respectively. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Different letters indicate a significant difference according to an analysis of variance (P < 0.05). (B) Histopathological analysis of mice in the liver, gut, and stomach of the mice tissue. The gray arrow indicates the accumulation of liver fat. The black arrow shows the location of the stomach or gut necrosis. GKLC1, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GKLC1; GKM3, Lactobacillus plantarum GKM3; GKS6, Lactobacillus paracasei GKS6.


Reference

1. Dey A, Cederbaum AI. Alcohol and oxidative liver injury. Hepatology. 2006; 43:S63–S74. PMID: 16447273.
Article
2. Nagata K, Suzuki H, Sakaguchi S. Common pathogenic mechanism in development progression of liver injury caused by non-alcoholic or alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Toxicol Sci. 2007; 32:453–468. PMID: 18198478.
Article
3. Ceni E, Mello T, Galli A. Pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease: role of oxidative metabolism. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:17756–17772. PMID: 25548474.
Article
4. Ringseis R, Muschick A, Eder K. Dietary oxidized fat prevents ethanol-induced triacylglycerol accumulation and increases expression of PPARalpha target genes in rat liver. J Nutr. 2007; 137:77–83. PMID: 17182804.
5. Masella R, Di Benedetto R, Varì R, Filesi C, Giovannini C. Novel mechanisms of natural antioxidant compounds in biological systems: involvement of glutathione and glutathione-related enzymes. J Nutr Biochem. 2005; 16:577–586. PMID: 16111877.
Article
6. Nanji AA. Role of Kupffer cells in alcoholic hepatitis. Alcohol. 2002; 27:13–15. PMID: 12062631.
Article
7. Wheeler MD. Endotoxin and Kupffer cell activation in alcoholic liver disease. Alcohol Res Health. 2003; 27:300–306. PMID: 15540801.
8. Cesaro C, Tiso A, Del Prete A, Cariello R, Tuccillo C, Cotticelli G, Del Vecchio Blanco C, Loguercio C. Gut microbiota and probiotics in chronic liver diseases. Dig Liver Dis. 2011; 43:431–438. PMID: 21163715.
Article
9. Gao B, Bataller R. Alcoholic liver disease: pathogenesis and new therapeutic targets. Gastroenterology. 2011; 141:1572–1585. PMID: 21920463.
Article
10. Nanji AA, Khettry U, Sadrzadeh SM. Lactobacillus feeding reduces endotoxemia and severity of experimental alcoholic liver (disease). Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1994; 205:243–247. PMID: 8171045.
11. Wang Y, Kirpich I, Liu Y, Ma Z, Barve S, McClain CJ, Feng W. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG treatment potentiates intestinal hypoxia-inducible factor, promotes intestinal integrity and ameliorates alcohol-induced liver injury. Am J Pathol. 2011; 179:2866–2875. PMID: 22093263.
12. Kirpich IA, Solovieva NV, Leikhter SN, Shidakova NA, Lebedeva OV, Sidorov PI, Bazhukova TA, Soloviev AG, Barve SS, McClain CJ, Cave M. Probiotics restore bowel flora and improve liver enzymes in human alcohol-induced liver injury: a pilot study. Alcohol. 2008; 42:675–682. PMID: 19038698.
Article
13. Gareau MG, Sherman PM, Walker WA. Probiotics and the gut microbiota in intestinal health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 7:503–514. PMID: 20664519.
Article
14. Hemarajata P, Versalovic J. Effects of probiotics on gut microbiota: mechanisms of intestinal immunomodulation and neuromodulation. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013; 6:39–51.
Article
15. Bull-Otterson L, Feng W, Kirpich I, Wang Y, Qin X, Liu Y, Gobejishvili L, Joshi-Barve S, Ayvaz T, Petrosino J, Kong M, Barker D, McClain C, Barve S. Metagenomic analyses of alcohol induced pathogenic alterations in the intestinal microbiome and the effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG treatment. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e53028. PMID: 23326376.
16. Forsyth CB, Farhadi A, Jakate SM, Tang Y, Shaikh M, Keshavarzian A. Lactobacillus GG treatment ameliorates alcohol-induced intestinal oxidative stress, gut leakiness, and liver injury in a rat model of alcoholic steatohepatitis. Alcohol. 2009; 43:163–172. PMID: 19251117.
17. Wang Y, Liu Y, Sidhu A, Ma Z, McClain C, Feng W. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG culture supernatant ameliorates acute alcohol-induced intestinal permeability and liver injury. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012; 303:G32–41. PMID: 22538402.
18. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957; 226:497–509. PMID: 13428781.
Article
19. Ryu JE, Jo W, Choi HJ, Jang S, Lee HJ, Woo DC, Kim JK, Kim KW, Yu ES, Son WC. Evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in C57BL/6J mice by using MRI and histopathologic analyses. Comp Med. 2015; 65:409–415. PMID: 26473344.
20. Shackelford C, Long G, Wolf J, Okerberg C, Herbert R. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of nonneoplastic lesions in toxicology studies. Toxicol Pathol. 2002; 30:93–96. PMID: 11890482.
Article
21. Osna NA, Donohue TM Jr, Kharbanda KK. Alcoholic liver disease: pathogenesis and current management. Alcohol Res. 2017; 38:147–161. PMID: 28988570.
22. Ahmed M. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in 2015. World J Hepatol. 2015; 7:1450–1459. PMID: 26085906.
Article
23. Horton JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J Clin Invest. 2002; 109:1125–1131. PMID: 11994399.
Article
24. Clugston RD, Jiang H, Lee MX, Piantedosi R, Yuen JJ, Ramakrishnan R, Lewis MJ, Gottesman ME, Huang LS, Goldberg IJ, Berk PD, Blaner WS. Altered hepatic lipid metabolism in C57BL/6 mice fed alcohol: a targeted lipidomic and gene expression study. J Lipid Res. 2011; 52:2021–2031. PMID: 21856784.
Article
25. Sun JR. Antiobesity effects of lactic acid bacteria supplements on high-fat diet-induced obese rats and their molecular mechanisms [master's thesis]. Taichung: Chung Shan Medical University;2017.
26. Salvaggio A, Periti M, Miano L, Tavanelli M, Marzorati D. Body mass index and liver enzyme activity in serum. Clin Chem. 1991; 37:720–723. PMID: 1674452.
Article
27. Ewaschuk J, Endersby R, Thiel D, Diaz H, Backer J, Ma M, Churchill T, Madsen K. Probiotic bacteria prevent hepatic damage and maintain colonic barrier function in a mouse model of sepsis. Hepatology. 2007; 46:841–850. PMID: 17659579.
Article
28. Gutiérrez-Ruiz MC, Quiroz SC, Souza V, Bucio L, Hernández E, Olivares IP, Llorente L, Vargas-Vorácková F, Kershenobich D. Cytokines, growth factors, and oxidative stress in HepG2 cells treated with ethanol, acetaldehyde, and LPS. Toxicology. 1999; 134:197–207. PMID: 10403637.
Article
29. Clark VL, Kruse JA. Clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations. JAMA. 1990; 264:2808–2809.
Article
30. Giannini EG, Testa R, Savarino V. Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians. CMAJ. 2005; 172:367–379. PMID: 15684121.
Article
31. Segawa S, Wakita Y, Hirata H, Watari J. Oral administration of heat-killed Lactobacillus brevis SBC8803 ameliorates alcoholic liver disease in ethanol-containing diet-fed C57BL/6N mice. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008; 128:371–377. PMID: 18976829.
32. Rao R. Endotoxemia and gut barrier dysfunction in alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology. 2009; 50:638–644. PMID: 19575462.
Article
33. Patel D, Patel F, Mandal P. Potential molecular mechanism of probiotics in alcoholic liver disease. J Alcohol Drug Depend. 2017; 5:278.
Article
34. Ohland CL, Macnaughton WK. Probiotic bacteria and intestinal epithelial barrier function. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010; 298:G807–19. PMID: 20299599.
Article
35. Chen X, Zhang J, Yi R, Mu J, Zhao X, Yang Z. Hepatoprotective effects of Lactobacillus on carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury in mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19:2212.
36. Leung TM, Nieto N. CYP2E1 and oxidant stress in alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2013; 58:395–398. PMID: 22940046.
Article
37. Salvi M, Battaglia V, Brunati AM, La Rocca N, Tibaldi E, Pietrangeli P, Marcocci L, Mondovì B, Rossi CA, Toninello A. Catalase takes part in rat liver mitochondria oxidative stress defense. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282:24407–24415. PMID: 17576767.
Article
Full Text Links
  • NRP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr