Ann Rehabil Med.  2020 Apr;44(2):109-116. 10.5535/arm.2020.44.2.109.

Factors Affecting Compliance With Weight-Bearing Restriction and the Amount of Weight-Bearing in the Elderly With Femur or Pelvic Fractures

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea
  • 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
  • 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea

Abstract


Objective
To determine the factors affecting the amount of weight-bearing during gait training in the elderly patients who underwent internal fixation after femur or pelvic fractures and how well they performed the weight-bearing restriction as directed by the physiatrist.
Methods
In this retrospective chart review study, we measured the amount of weight-bearing on the affected side in 50 patients undergoing internal fixation surgery and rehabilitation after femur or pelvic fracture using a force plate. Patients receiving non-weight-bearing or partial weight-bearing education were considered to perform weight-bearing restriction well when the amount of weight-bearing was <50 lb. Furthermore, regression analysis was performed to determine the effects of postoperative complications, age, cognitive function, and pain on weightbearing restriction.
Results
Variables affecting the amount of weight-bearing were age (r=0.581, p<0.001), weight-bearing education type (r=0.671, p<0.001), manual muscle strength of hip flexion on the non-affected side (r=-0.296, p=0.037), hip abduction (r=-0.326, p=0.021), knee extension (r=-0.374, p=0.007), ankle plantar flexion (r=-0.374, p=0.008), right hand grip strength (r=-0.535, p<0.001), Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (r=-0.496, p<0.001), Clinical Dementia Rating (r=0.308, p=0.03), and pain visual analog scale scores (r=0.318, p=0.024). The significant predictor of the amount of weight-bearing among these variables was age (β=0.448, p=0.001). The weight-bearing restriction adherence rate was significantly lower, at 22%, for patients aged ≥65 years as compared to 73% for those <65 years.
Conclusion
Age was a major variable affecting the amount of weight-bearing. Compliance with weight-bearing restriction was significantly lower in patients aged ≥65 years than in patients <65 years.

Keyword

Weight-bearing; Femoral fractures; Aged; Gait; Rehabilitation

Figure

  • Fig. 1. The maximum peak force on the affected side of the patient is measured through the force plate. (A) Real-time peak force measurement and (B) image of a patient walking.


Reference

1. Roberts KC, Brox WT, Jevsevar DS, Sevarino K. Management of hip fractures in the elderly. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23:131–7.
Article
2. Lee KH, Kim JY, Yim SJ, Moon DH, Choi GH, Moon KH. Incidence and risk factors of subsequent hip fractures in Korea: multicenter study. J Korean Med Sci. 2014; 29:992–4.
Article
3. Kim SR, Park YG, Kang SY, Nam KW, Park YG, Ha YC. Undertreatment of osteoporosis following hip fractures in jeju cohort study. J Bone Metab. 2014; 21:263–8.
Article
4. Ha YC, Park YG, Nam KW, Kim SR. Trend in hip fracture incidence and mortality in Korea: a prospective cohort study from 2002 to 2011. J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30:483–8.
Article
5. Park YG, Jang S, Ha YC. Incidence, morbidity and mortality in patients older than 50 years with second hip fracture in a Jeju cohort study. Hip Pelvis. 2014; 26:250–5.
Article
6. Miyamoto RG, Kaplan KM, Levine BR, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD. Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. I: femoral neck fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008; 16:596–607.
Article
7. Murphy NM, Carroll P. The effect of physical activity and its interaction with nutrition on bone health. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003; 62:829–38.
Article
8. Kim CS, Maekawa Y, Fujita M, Sato N, Nishimuta M, Ishizaki Y, et al. Immobilization on the day 14th does not disrupts the basic diurnal rhythm of bone resorption. J Gravit Physiol. 2000; 7:P125–6.
9. Ariza-Vega P, Kristensen MT, Martin-Martin L, Jimenez-Moleon JJ. Predictors of long-term mortality in older people with hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96:1215–21.
Article
10. Kalmet PH, Meys G, Horn YY, Evers SM, Seelen HA, Hustinx P, et al. Permissive weight bearing in trauma patients with fracture of the lower extremities: prospective multicenter comparative cohort study. BMC Surg. 2018; 18:8.
Article
11. Hoyt BW, Pavey GJ, Pasquina PF, Potter BK. Rehabilitation of lower extremity trauma: a review of principles and military perspective on future directions. Curr Trauma Rep. 2015; 1:50–60.
Article
12. Vasarhelyi A, Baumert T, Fritsch C, Hopfenmuller W, Gradl G, Mittlmeier T. Partial weight bearing after surgery for fractures of the lower extremity: is it achievable? Gait Posture. 2006; 23:99–105.
13. Damm P, Schwachmeyer V, Dymke J, Bender A, Bergmann G. In vivo hip joint loads during three methods of walking with forearm crutches. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013; 28:530–5.
Article
14. Kubiak EN, Beebe MJ, North K, Hitchcock R, Potter MQ. Early weight bearing after lower extremity fractures in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013; 21:727–38.
Article
15. Braun BJ, Veith NT, Rollmann M, Orth M, Fritz T, Herath SC, et al. Weight-bearing recommendations after operative fracture treatment-fact or fiction? Gait results with and feasibility of a dynamic, continuous pedobarography insole. Int Orthop. 2017; 41:1507–12.
Article
16. Beaupre LA, Jones CA, Saunders LD, Johnston DW, Buckingham J, Majumdar SR. Best practices for elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic overview of the evidence. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20:1019–25.
Article
17. Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, McQueen MM, Ricci WM, Tornetta P, McKee MD. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health;2014.
18. Elliott DS, Newman KJ, Forward DP, Hahn DM, Ollivere B, Kojima K, et al. A unified theory of bone healing and nonunion: BHN theory. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98B:884–91.
19. Kammerlander C, Pfeufer D, Lisitano LA, Mehaffey S, Bocker W, Neuerburg C. Inability of older adult patients with hip fracture to maintain postoperative weight-bearing restrictions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100:936–41.
Article
20. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Appropriate use criteria for postoperative rehabilitation of low energy hip fractures in the elderly. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons;2015.
21. Kressig RW, Beauchet O. Gait analysis and tailored exercise prescription in older adults. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2004; 37:15–9.
22. Hurkmans HL, Bussmann JB, Selles RW, Benda E, Stam HJ, Verhaar JA. The difference between actual and prescribed weight bearing of total hip patients with a trochanteric osteotomy: long-term vertical force measurements inside and outside the hospital. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88:200–6.
Article
23. Mills LA, Aitken SA, Simpson AH. The risk of nonunion per fracture: current myths and revised figures from a population of over 4 million adults. Acta Orthop. 2017; 88:434–9.
Article
24. Austin PC, Steyerberg EW. The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68:627–36.
Article
25. Choi SH, Na DL, Lee BH, Hahm DS, Jeong JH, Yoon SJ, et al. Estimating the validity of the Korean version of expanded clinical dementia rating (CDR) scale. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2001; 19:585–91.
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr