1. NIH Consensus Development Conference. NIH consensus development panel on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy, March 7–29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J. 2001; 94:569–573. PMID:
11440324.
2. Choi YJ, Oh HJ, Kim DJ, et al. The prevalence of osteoporosis in Korean adults aged 50 years or older and the higher diagnosis rates in women who were beneficiaries of a national screening program: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2009. J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27:1879–1886. PMID:
22532494.
Article
3. Jung Y, Ko Y, Kim HY, et al. Gender differences in anti-osteoporosis drug treatment after osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Metab. 2019; 37:134–141. PMID:
29536198.
Article
4. Lee YK, Ha YC, Choi HJ, et al. Bisphosphonate use and subsequent hip fracture in South Korea. Osteoporos Int. 2013; 24:2887–2892. PMID:
23681088.
Article
5. Lee YK, Ha YC, Yoon BH, et al. Incidence of second hip fracture and compliant use of bisphosphonate. Osteoporos Int. 2013; 24:2099–2104. PMID:
23247329.
Article
6. Merlijn T, Swart KM, van Schoor NM, et al. The effect of a screening and treatment program for the prevention of fractures in older women: A randomized pragmatic trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2019; 34:1993–2000. PMID:
31220365.
Article
7. Curtis JR, Silverman SL. Commentary: the five Ws of a Fracture Liaison Service: why, who, what, where, and how? In osteoporosis, we reap what we sow. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013; 11:365–368. PMID:
24104520.
Article
8. Wu CH, Tu ST, Chang YF, et al. Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Bone. 2018; 111:92–100. PMID:
29555309.
Article
9. Leal J, Gray AM, Hawley S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of orthogeriatric and fracture liaison service models of care for hip fracture patients: A population-based study. J Bone Miner Res. 2017; 32:203–211. PMID:
27632945.
Article
10. Yong JH, Masucci L, Hoch JS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service--a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision. Osteoporos Int. 2016; 27:231–240. PMID:
26275439.
11. Chadha M, Shingare A, Prasanth A, et al. Fracture liaison service: Prevention by coordination. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 22:719–721. PMID:
30766806.
Article
12. Bogoch ER, Elliot-Gibson V, Beaton D, et al. Fracture prevention in the orthopaedic environment: Outcomes of a coordinator-based fracture liaison service. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99:820–831. PMID:
28509822.
Article
13. Nho JH, Lee YK, Ha YC, et al. Can alarming improve compliance with weekly bisphosphonate in patients with osteoporosis? J Bone Metab. 2016; 23:51–54. PMID:
27294076.
Article
14. Mugnier B, Daumas A, Couderc AL, et al. Clinical effectiveness of osteoporosis treatment in older patients: A fracture liaison service-based prospective study. J Women Aging. 2019; 31:553–565. PMID:
30295566.
Article
15. Kim JY, Yoo JH, Kim JW, et al. Pop-up messages in order communication systems can increase awareness of osteoporosis among physicians and improve osteoporosis treatment. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016; 22:887–891. PMID:
27151774.
Article
16. Judge A, Javaid MK, Leal J, et al. Models of care for the delivery of secondary fracture prevention after hip fracture: a health service cost,clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness study within a region of England. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2016; DOI:
10.3310/hsdr04280.
17. Yoo JH, Moon SH, Ha YC, et al. Osteoporotic fracture: 2015 Position statement of the Korean society for bone and mineral research. J Bone Metab. 2015; 22:175–181. PMID:
26713308.
Article