Healthc Inform Res.  2020 Jan;26(1):42-49. 10.4258/hir.2020.26.1.42.

Prediction of Drug–Drug Interactions by Using Profile Fingerprint Vectors and Protein Similarities

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Computer Engineering, Bahcesehir University, Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • 2Department of Software Engineering, Bahcesehir University, Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey. serkan.ayvaz@eng.bau.edu.tr

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
Drug-drug interaction (DDI) is a vital problem that threatens people's health. However, the prediction of DDIs through in-vivo experiments is not only extremely costly but also difficult as many serious side effects are hard to detect in in-vivo and in-vitro settings. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of similarity-based in-silico computational DDI prediction approaches and to provide a cost effective and scalable solution to predict potential DDIs.
METHODS
In this study, widely known similarity-based computational DDI prediction methods were utilized to discover novel potential DDIs. More specifically, known interactions, drug targets, adverse effects, and protein similarities of drug pairs were used to construct drug fingerprints for the prediction of DDIs.
RESULTS
Using the drug interaction profile, our approach achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.975 in the prediction of a potential DDI. The drug adverse effect profile and protein profile similarity-based methods resulted in AUC values of 0.685 and 0.895, respectively, in the prediction of DDIs.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we developed a computational approach to the prediction of potential drug interactions. The performance of the similarity-based computational methods was comparatively evaluated using a comprehensive real-world DDI dataset. The evaluations showed that the drug interaction profile information is a better predictor of DDIs compared to drug adverse effects and protein similarities among DDI pairs.

Keyword

Drug Interactions; Knowledge Discovery; Computing Methodologies; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Pharmaceutical Databases

MeSH Terms

Area Under Curve
Computing Methodologies
Databases, Pharmaceutical
Dataset
Dermatoglyphics*
Drug Interactions
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

Figure

  • Figure 1 Prediction matrix M3 calculation.

  • Figure 2 Carrier target enzyme transporter (CTET) vector representation of drugs. Adapted from Ferdousi R, et al. J Biomed Inform 2017;70:54–64 [6].

  • Figure 3 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for interaction profile fingerprint test data. AUC: area under the curve.

  • Figure 4 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for adverse effect profile fingerprint test data. AUC: area under the curve.

  • Figure 5 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for protein test data. AUC: area under the curve.


Cited by  1 articles

Estimating the Optimal Dexketoprofen Pharmaceutical Formulation with Machine Learning Methods and Statistical Approaches
Atakan Başkor, Yağmur Pirinçci Tok, Burcu Mesut, Yıldız Özsoy, Tamer Uçar
Healthc Inform Res. 2021;27(4):279-286.    doi: 10.4258/hir.2021.27.4.279.


Reference

1. Vilar S, Uriarte E, Santana L, Lorberbaum T, Hripcsak G, Friedman C, et al. Similarity-based modeling in large-scale prediction of drug-drug interactions. Nat Protoc. 2014; 9(9):2147–2163.
Article
2. US Food and Drug Administration [Internet]. White Oak (MD): Food and Drug Administration;c2019. cited at 2020 Jan 19. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/.
3. Cheng F, Zhao Z. Machine learning-based prediction of drug-drug interactions by integrating drug phenotypic, therapeutic, chemical, and genomic properties. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014; 21(e2):e278–e286.
Article
4. Fowler S, Zhang H. In vitro evaluation of reversible and irreversible cytochrome P450 inhibition: current status on methodologies and their utility for predicting drug-drug interactions. AAPS J. 2008; 10(2):410–424.
Article
5. Jonker DM, Visser SA, van der Graaf PH, Voskuyl RA, Danhof M. Towards a mechanism-based analysis of pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions in vivo. Pharmacol Ther. 2005; 106(1):1–18.
Article
6. Ferdousi R, Safdari R, Omidi Y. Computational prediction of drug-drug interactions based on drugs functional similarities. J Biomed Inform. 2017; 70:54–64.
Article
7. Tatonetti NP, Ye PP, Daneshjou R, Altman RB. Datadriven prediction of drug effects and interactions. Sci Transl Med. 2012; 4(125):125ra31.
Article
8. Vilar S, Uriarte E, Santana L, Tatonetti NP, Friedman C. Detection of drug-drug interactions by modeling interaction profile fingerprints. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e58321.
Article
9. Zhang W, Zou H, Luo L, Liu Q, Wu W, Xiao W. Predicting potential side effects of drugs by recommender methods and ensemble learning. Neurocomputing. 2016; 173:979–987.
Article
10. Ayvaz S, Horn J, Hassanzadeh O, Zhu Q, Stan J, Tatonetti NP, et al. Toward a complete dataset of drug-drug interaction information from publicly available sources. J Biomed Inform. 2015; 55:206–217.
Article
11. Noor A, Assiri A, Ayvaz S, Clark C, Dumontier M. Drug-drug interaction discovery and demystification using Semantic Web technologies. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 24(3):556–564.
Article
12. Vilar S, Harpaz R, Uriarte E, Santana L, Rabadan R, Friedman C. Drug-drug interaction through molecular structure similarity analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012; 19(6):1066–1074.
Article
13. Vilar S, Uriarte E, Santana L, Friedman C, Tatonetti NP. State of the art and development of a drug-drug interaction large scale predictor based on 3D pharmacophoric similarity. Curr Drug Metab. 2014; 15(5):490–501.
Article
14. Liu M, Wu Y, Chen Y, Sun J, Zhao Z, Chen XW, et al. Large-scale prediction of adverse drug reactions using chemical, biological, and phenotypic properties of drugs. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012; 19(e1):e28–e35.
Article
15. Tatonetti NP, Fernald GH, Altman RB. A novel signal detection algorithm for identifying hidden drug-drug interactions in adverse event reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012; 19(1):79–85.
Article
16. Harpaz R, Haerian K, Chase HS, Friedman C. Statistical mining of potential drug interaction adverse effects in FDA's spontaneous reporting system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010; 2010:281–285.
17. Ibrahim H, Saad A, Abdo A, Sharaf Eldin A. Mining association patterns of drug-interactions using post marketing FDA's spontaneous reporting data. J Biomed Inform. 2016; 60:294–308.
Article
18. Hudelson MG, Ketkar NS, Holder LB, Carlson TJ, Peng CC, Waldher BJ, et al. High confidence predictions of drug-drug interactions: predicting affinities for cytochrome P450 2C9 with multiple computational methods. J Med Chem. 2008; 51(3):648–654.
Article
19. Percha B, Garten Y, Altman RB. Discovery and explanation of drug-drug interactions via text mining. In : Altman RB, Dunker AK, Hunter L, Murrey TA, Klein TE, editors. Biocomputing 2012. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing;2011. p. 410–421.
20. Tari L, Anwar S, Liang S, Cai J, Baral C. Discovering drug-drug interactions: a text-mining and reasoning approach based on properties of drug metabolism. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(18):i547–i553.
Article
21. Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf. 1999; 20(2):109–117.
Article
22. Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Shrivastava S, Hassanali M, Stothard P, et al. DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(Database issue):D668–D672.
Article
23. Fligner MA, Verducci JS, Blower PE. A modification of the Jaccard–Tanimoto similarity index for diverse selection of chemical compounds using binary strings. Technometrics. 2002; 44(2):110–119.
Article
24. Willett P. Similarity-based approaches to virtual screening. Biochem Soc Trans. 2003; 31(Pt 3):603–606.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr