Korean J Radiol.  2020 Jan;21(1):108-116. 10.3348/kjr.2019.0215.

Concordance of Three International Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules Classified by Ultrasonography and Diagnostic Performance of Biopsy Criteria

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea.
  • 2Department of Radiology, GangNeung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea. nndgna@gmail.com
  • 3Department of Radiology, Ajou University, School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 4Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Radiology, Thyroid Center, Daerim St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To investigate the concordance of three international guidelines: the Korean Thyroid Association/Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology, American Thyroid Association, and American College of Radiology for thyroid nodules classified by ultrasonography (US) and the diagnostic performance of simulated size criteria for malignant biopsies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 2586 thyroid nodules (≥ 1 cm) were collected from two multicenter study datasets. The classifications of the thyroid nodules were based on three different guidelines according to US categories for malignancy risk, and the concordance rate between the different guidelines was calculated for the classified nodules. In addition, the diagnostic performance of criteria related to four different simulated biopsy sizes was evaluated.
RESULTS
The concordance rate of nodules classified as high- or intermediate-suspicion was high (84.1-100%), but low-suspicion or mildly-suspicious nodules exhibited relatively low concordance (63.8-83.8%) between the three guidelines. The differences in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy between the guidelines were 0.7-19.8%, 0-40.9%, and 0.1-30.5%, respectively, when the original biopsy criteria were applied. The differences decreased to 0-5.9%, 0-10.9%, and 0.1-8.2%, respectively, when simulated, similar biopsy size criteria were applied. The unnecessary biopsy rate calculated with the original criteria (0-33.8%), decreased with the simulated biopsy size criteria (0-8.7%).
CONCLUSION
We found a high concordance between the three guidelines for high- or intermediate-suspicion nodules, and the diagnostic performance of the biopsy criteria was approximately equivalent for each simulated size criterion. The difference in diagnostic performance between the three guidelines is mostly influenced by the various size thresholds for biopsies.

Keyword

Thyroid nodules; Thyroid cancer; Thyroid imaging reporting and data system; Ultrasonography; Size threshold; Guidelines

MeSH Terms

Biopsy*
Classification
Dataset
Sensitivity and Specificity
Thyroid Gland*
Thyroid Neoplasms
Thyroid Nodule*
Ultrasonography*
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
    DB Error: unknown error