J Korean Soc Matern Child Health.  2019 Oct;23(4):241-249. 10.21896/jksmch.2019.23.4.241.

Expansion of Health Insurance Coverage for Prenatal Care and Its Association with Low Birth Weight and Premature Birth

• Kim EJ
• Park HJ

• KMID: 2465145
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2019.23.4.241

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the cost of medical care for pregnancy and childbirth and the birth outcome.
METHODS
Using the Korean National Health Insurance Corporation cohort data, we compared the birth outcome of 2,198 subjects before policy (2005-2008) and after policy (2009-2012) costs related to pregnancy and childbirth.
RESULTS
After the rate of application of the maternity care fee increased by 2.3%, the cesarean section rate increased by 15%. The incidence of low birth weight was significantly lower in women under 35 years of age, as well as in women over 35 years of age who had delivered a child through cesarean section.
CONCLUSION
After the policy implementation, the rates of low birth weight and premature childbirth decreased at all ages, for second or subsequent births. Considering the purpose of the pregnancy and childbirth care support policy, implemented to reduce the burden of medical expenses and to create a favorable environment for childbirth, it is necessary to expand coverage by converting nonpayment items, and to develop diverse and comprehensive policies that consider pregnant women's characteristics.

Keyword

Health policy; Program evaluation; Prenatal care; Low birth weight; Premature birth

MeSH Terms

Cesarean Section
Child
Cohort Studies
Fees and Charges
Female
Health Policy
Humans
Incidence
Infant, Low Birth Weight*
Infant, Newborn
Insurance, Health*
National Health Programs
Parturition
Pregnancy
Premature Birth*
Prenatal Care*
Program Evaluation

Reference

Ahmed S., Khan MM. Is demand-side financing equity enhancing? Lessons from a maternal health voucher scheme in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med. 2011. 72:1704–10.

Anum EA., Retchin SM., Strauss JF 3rd. Medicaid and preterm birth and low birth weight: the last two decades. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010. 19:443–51.

Bae CW., Kim KS., Kim BI., Shin SM., Lee SL., Lim BK, et al. Patient distribution and hospital admission costs in neonatal intensive care unit: collective study of 7 hospitals in Korea during 2006. J Korean Soc Neonatol. 2009. 16:25–35.

Betrán AP., Torloni MR., Zhang JJ., Gülmezoglu AM; WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG. 2016. 123:667–70.

Bhatt CB., Beck-Sagué CM. Medicaid expansion and infant mortality in the united states. Am J Public Health. 2018. 108:565–7.

Currie J., Grogger J. Medicaid expansions and welfare contractions: offsetting effects on prenatal care and infant health? J Health Econ. 2002. 21:313–35.

Dubay L., Joyce T., Kaestner R., Kenney GM. Changes in prenatal care timing and low birth weight by race and socioeconomic status: implications for the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women. Health Serv Res. 2001. 36:373–98.

Hong JR. The effects of the health insurance coverage expansion for prenatal care on health care utilization and health outcomes. J Korean Home Econ Assoc. 2016. 22:67–98.

Howell EM., Dubay L., Kenney G., Sommers AS. The impact of Medicaid managed care on pregnant women in Ohio: a cohort analysis. Health Serv Res. 2004. 39(4 Pt 1):825–46.

Ir P., Horemans D., Souk N., Van Damme W. Using targeted vouchers and health equity funds to improve access to skilled birth attendants for poor women: a case study in three rural health districts in Cambodia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010. 10:1.

Kang H., Son Y. Experience of Korean pregnant women for the use of medical expense aid service (KoEunMom card). J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2011. 15:175–85.

Kim H., Lim S., Lee R., Park S., Go D., Na H, et al. The survey research on pregnant Woman’s recognition about GOUN-MAM CARD of childbirth promotion policy. J Digit Converg. 2012. 10:241–50.

Kim HJ. Status and measures of pregnancy support policy. In : Proceedings of KSLP conference; Seoul. In : The Korean Society of Maternal and Child Health; 2014. 29–52.

Kim K., Hwang R., Yun J., Kim J. Prenatal care utilization and expenditure among pregnant women. Health Policy Manag. 2009. 19:53–65.

Kozhimannil KB., Hardeman RR., Attanasio LB., Blauer-Peterson C., O'Brien M. Doula care, birth outcomes, and costs among Medicaid beneficiaries. Am J Public Health. 2013. 103:e113–21.

Lee N. Ways to improve prenatal care in a low-fertility. In : Korea Health Welf Forum; 2014. 217:67–74.

Lee S. Status and direction of healthcare policy for pregnancy and childbirth support. In : Health Welf Forum; 2017. 34–44.

Lee S., Choe I. Policy support for medical expenses on pregnancy and delivery: the kookmin haengbok card program report. Report No.:2016. 12. Sejong (Korea): Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2016.

Lee S., Kim E., Park J., Byeon S., Oh M., Lee S. National birth and family health and welfare survey Report. Report No.: 2018-37. Sejong (Korea): Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2018.

Lin S. Assessing the effect of prenatal care on birth outcome in Taiwan. Soc Sci J. 2004. 41:493–501.

NHS England. Understanding the New NHS: a guide for everyone working and training within the NHS. London: NHS;2014.

Nobuya U. The perinatal care system in japan. Japan Med Assoc J. 2011. 54:234–40.

Park S., Park J., Lee J. Comparison of the prenatal care utilization indices in relationship to the pregnancy outcomes. J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2000. 4:255–70.

Roman L., Raffo JE., Zhu Q., Meghea CI. A statewide Medicaid enhanced prenatal care program: impact on birth outcomes. JAMA Pediatr. 2014. 168:220–7.

Statistics Korea. Birth and death statistics interim results in 2018 [Internet]. Sejong (Korea): Statistics Korea;2019. [cited 2019 Jun 5]. Available from: http://kosis.kr/index/index.do.

The Lancet. Stemming the global caesarean section epidemic. Lancet. 2018. 392:1279.