Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2019 Nov;62(6):438-444. 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.6.438.

A survey on the awareness and knowledge about elective oocyte cryopreservation among unmarried women of reproductive age visiting a private fertility center

• Hong YH
• Park JW
• Kim H
• Kim SK
• Choo CW
• Jee BC
• Suh CS
• Kim SH

• KMID: 2462122
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2019.62.6.438

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to investigate the level of awareness and knowledge regarding elective oocyte cryopreservation (OC) among unmarried women of reproductive age in Korea.
METHODS
A survey was conducted among 86 women who visited a fertility preservation clinic for counseling about elective OC between December 2016 and May 2018. Participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire regarding their awareness and knowledge of fertility and OC.
RESULTS
The questionnaire was completed by 71 women. Among them, 73% decided to undergo OC after counseling. The main reason for making this decision was that they wished to maintain their fertility in the future (70.6%). Conversely, the high cost for the procedure was the main reason given by those who chose to forego this procedure. Regarding fertility and OC, the participants' knowledge was poor. Most women expected greater financial support from the government or from their place of employment.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrated that the awareness and knowledge about elective OC were relatively poor among the female Korean population. These findings may help clinicians in better counselling of their patients.

Keyword

Cryopreservation; Oocytes; Fertility preservation; Surveys and questionnaires; Awareness

MeSH Terms

Counseling
Cryopreservation*
Employment
Female
Fertility Preservation
Fertility*
Financial Support
Humans
Korea
Oocytes*
Single Person*
Surveys and Questionnaires

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Awareness of participants about oocyte cryopreservation. (A) Time interval between hearing about to the decision to execute oocyte cryopreservation; (B) Reason for the decision to execute oocyte cryopreservation (plural answers were allowed); (C) Attitudes of women towards oocyte donation (plural answers were allowed).

Reference

1. Herbert M, Kalleas D, Cooney D, Lamb M, Lister L. Meiosis and maternal aging: insights from aneuploid oocytes and trisomy births. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015; 7:a017970.

2. Pellestor F, Andréo B, Arnal F, Humeau C, Demaille J. Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes. Hum Genet. 2003; 112:195–203.

3. Battaglia DE, Goodwin P, Klein NA, Soules MR. Influence of maternal age on meiotic spindle assembly in oocytes from naturally cycling women. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11:2217–2222.

4. Cobo A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Domingo J, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Is vitrification of oocytes useful for fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline and in cancer patients? Fertil Steril. 2013; 99:1485–1495.

5. Rudick B, Opper N, Paulson R, Bendikson K, Chung K. The status of oocyte cryopreservation in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94:2642–2646.

6. Practice Committees of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99:37–43.

7. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110:1022–1028.

8. Stoop D, Nekkebroeck J, Devroey P. A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26:655–661.

9. Lallemant C, Vassard D, Nyboe Andersen A, Schmidt L, Macklon N. Medical and social egg freezing: internet-based survey of knowledge and attitudes among women in Denmark and the UK. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 95:1402–1410.

10. Daniluk JC, Koert E. Childless women's beliefs and knowledge about oocyte freezing for social and medical reasons. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31:2313–2320.

11. Tan SQ, Tan AW, Lau MS, Tan HH, Nadarajah S. Social oocyte freezing: a survey among Singaporean female medical students. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014; 40:1345–1352.

12. Cobo A, García-Velasco JA, Coello A, Domingo J, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2016; 105:755–764.e8.

13. Cil AP, Bang H, Oktay K. Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100:492–499.e3.

14. Milman LW, Senapati S, Sammel MD, Cameron KD, Gracia C. Assessing reproductive choices of women and the likelihood of oocyte cryopreservation in the era of elective oocyte freezing. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107:1214–1222.e3.

15. Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Smith M, Noyes N. What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertil Steril. 2013; 100:1343–1349.

16. Ter Keurst A, Boivin J, Gameiro S. Women's intentions to use fertility preservation to prevent age-related fertility decline. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016; 32:121–131.

17. Kim R, Yoon TK, Kang IS, Koong MK, Kim YS, Kim MJ, et al. Decision making processes of women who seek elective oocyte cryopreservation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35:1623–1630.