J Adv Prosthodont.  2019 Aug;11(4):223-231. 10.4047/jap.2019.11.4.223.

Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of indirect resin composite to resin matrix ceramics

• Çelik E
• Åžahin SC
• Dede DO

• KMID: 2455931
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.4.223

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of an indirect resin composite (IRC) to the various resin matrix ceramic (RMC) blocks using different surface treatments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ninety-nine cubic RMC specimens consisting of a resin nanoceramic (RNC), a polymer-infiltrated hybrid ceramic (PIHC), and a flexible hybrid ceramic (FHC) were divided randomly into three surface treatment subgroups (n = 11). In the experimental groups, untreated (Cnt), tribochemical silica coating (Tbc), and Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser irradiation (Lsr) with 3 W (150 mJ/pulse, 20 Hz for 20 sec.) were used as surface treatments. An indirect composite resin (IRC) was layered with a disc-shape mold (2 × 3 mm) onto the treated-ceramic surfaces and the specimens submitted to thermal cycling (6000 cycles, 5 - 55℃). The SBS test of specimens was performed using a universal testing machine and the specimens were examined with a scanning electron microscope to determine the failure mode. Data were statistically analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD test (α=.05).
RESULTS
According to the two-way ANOVA, only the surface treatment parameter was statistically significant (P<.05) on the SBS of IRC to RMC. The SBS values of Lsr-applied RMC groups were significantly higher than Cnt groups for each RMC material, (P<.05). Significant differences were also determined between Tbc surface treatment applied and untreated (Cnt) PIHC materials (P=.039).
CONCLUSION
For promoting a reliable bond strength during characterization of RMC with IRC, Nd:YAG laser or Tbc surface treatment technique should be used, putting in consideration the microstructure and composition of RMC materials and appropriate parameters for each material.

Keyword

Ceramics; Composite resins; Laser; Shear strength

MeSH Terms

Aluminum
Ceramics*
Composite Resins
Fungi
Shear Strength
Silicon Dioxide
Yttrium
Aluminum
Composite Resins
Silicon Dioxide
Yttrium

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Schematic view of SBS testing.

• 

  Fig. 2 SEM images (× 2000 magnification) of FHC RMC groups: (A) Cnt, (B) Tbc, (C) Lsr.

• 

  Fig. 3 SEM images (× 2000 magnification) of PIHC RMC groups: (A) Cnt, (B) Tbc, (C) Lsr.

• 

  Fig. 4 SEM images (× 2000 magnification) of RNC RMC groups: (A) Cnt, (B) Tbc, (C) Lsr.

Reference

1. Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations-criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:28–50. PMID: 22867859.

2. Filho AM, Vieira LC, Araujo E, Monteiro Junior S. Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensile bond strength. J Prosthodont. 2004; 13:28–35. PMID: 15032893.

3. Kumbuloglu O, User A, Toksavul S, Vallittu PK. Intra-oral adhesive systems for ceramic repairs: a comparison. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003; 61:268–272. PMID: 14763777.

4. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34:161–167. PMID: 25736259.

5. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res. 2014; 93:1232–1234. PMID: 25344335.

6. Alt V, Hannig M, Wöstmann B, Balkenhol M. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent Mater. 2011; 27:339–347. PMID: 21176946.

7. Balkenhol M, Mautner MC, Ferger P, Wöstmann B. Mechanical properties of provisional crown and bridge materials: chemical-curing versus dual-curing systems. J Dent. 2008; 36:15–20. PMID: 18031919.

8. Göncü Başaran E, Ayna E, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Load-bearing capacity of handmade and computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated three-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite. Acta Odontol Scand. 2011; 69:144–150. PMID: 21208023.

9. Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Trottmann A, Özcan M, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16:1669–1677.

10. Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hämmerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J. 2012; 31:377–383. PMID: 22673470.

11. Barutcigil K, Barutcigil Ç, Kul E, Özarslan MM, Buyukkaplan US. Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength of resin cement to a CAD/CAM restorative material. J Prosthodont. 2019; 28:71–78. PMID: 27880028.

12. Stawarczyk B, Trottmann A, Hämmerle CH, Özcan M. Adhesion of veneering resins to polymethylmethacrylate-based CAD/CAM polymers after various surface conditioning methods. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71:1142–1148. PMID: 23351222.

13. Stawarczyk B, Özcan M, Trottmann A, Schmutz F, Roos M, Hämmerle C. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109:325–332. PMID: 23684283.

14. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Irie M, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks. Dent Mater. 2017; 33:e124–e135. PMID: 28057347.

15. Güngör MB, Nemli SK, Bal BT, Ünver S, Doğan A. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016; 8:259–266. PMID: 27555894.

16. Kurbad A, Kurbad S. A new, hybrid material for minimally invasive restorations in clinical use. Int J Comput Dent. 2013; 16:69–79. PMID: 23641665.

17. Albero A, Pascual A, Camps I, Grau-Benitez M. Comparative characterization of a novel cad-cam polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015; 7:e495–e500. PMID: 26535096.

18. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112:1141–1150. PMID: 24980740.

19. Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114:587–593. PMID: 26141648.

20. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28:227–235. PMID: 25965634.

21. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115:71–75. PMID: 26386483.

22. Duzyol M, Sagsoz O, Polat Sagsoz N, Akgul N, Yildiz M. The effect of surface treatments on the bond strength between CAD/CAM blocks and composite resin. J Prosthodont. 2016; 25:466–471. PMID: 26216441.

23. Venezia P, Torsello F, Cavalcanti R, D'Amato S. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114:506–512. PMID: 25979446.

24. Ikeda M, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Shear bond strengths of indirect resin composites to hybrid ceramic. Dent Mater J. 2005; 24:238–243. PMID: 16022445.

25. Kobayashi K, Komine F, Blatz MB, Saito A, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Influence of priming agents on the short-term bond strength of an indirect composite veneering material to zirconium dioxide ceramic. Quintessence Int. 2009; 40:545–551. PMID: 19626228.

26. Komine F, Kobayashi K, Saito A, Fushiki R, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Shear bond strength between an indirect composite veneering material and zirconia ceramics after thermocycling. J Oral Sci. 2009; 51:629–634. PMID: 20032618.

27. Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014; 26:382–393. PMID: 24754327.

28. Honda MI, Flório FM, Basting RT. Effectiveness of indirect composite resin silanization evaluated by microtensile bond strength test. Am J Dent. 2008; 21:153–158. PMID: 18686765.

29. Blum IR, Hafiana K, Curtis A, Barbour ME, Attin T, Lynch CD, Jagger DC. The effect of surface conditioning on the bond strength of resin composite to amalgam. J Dent. 2012; 40:15–21. PMID: 22100436.

30. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. The impact of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on the performance of a porcelain laminate restorative material. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:461–468. PMID: 16620948.

31. Akyıl MŞ, Yılmaz A, Bayındır F, Duymuş ZY. Microtensile bond strength of resin cement to a feldspathic ceramic. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011; 29:197–203. PMID: 21166587.

32. Heikkinen TT, Lassila LV, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Effect of operating air pressure on tribochemical silica-coating. Acta Odontol Scand. 2007; 65:241–248. PMID: 17762988.

33. Gökçe B, Ozpinar B, Dündar M, Cömlekoglu E, Sen BH, Güngör MA. Bond strengths of all-ceramics: acid vs laser etching. Oper Dent. 2007; 32:173–178. PMID: 17427827.

34. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y, Oki M, Finger WJ, Arksornnukit M. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J. 2014; 33:705–710. PMID: 25273052.

35. Yavuz T, Dilber E, Kara HB, Tuncdemir AR, Ozturk AN. Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems. Lasers Med Sci. 2013; 28:1233–1239. PMID: 22971913.

36. Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71:453–461. PMID: 8006839.

37. Kajdas CK. Importance of the triboemission process for tribochemical reaction. Trib Int. 2005; 38:337–353.

38. Tekçe N, Tuncer S, Demirci M. The effect of sandblasting duration on the bond durability of dual-cure adhesive cement to CAD/CAM resin restoratives. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018; 10:211–217. PMID: 29930791.

39. da Silva Ferreira S, Hanashiro FS, de Souza-Zaroni WC, Turbino ML, Youssef MN. Influence of aluminum oxide sandblasting associated with Nd:YAG or Er:YAG lasers on shear bond strength of a feldspathic ceramic to resin cements. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010; 28:471–475. PMID: 19780632.

40. Kursoglu P, Motro PF, Yurdaguven H. Shear bond strength of resin cement to an acid etched and a laser irradiated ceramic surface. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5:98–103. PMID: 23755333.

41. Kamel M, Ghallab O, Wahsh M. Assessment of ER, CR: YSGG laser surface treatment and self-adhesive resin cements formulae on microtensile bond strength to various CAD/CAM ceramic esthetic materials: an in vitro study. Egyptian Dent J. 2018; 64:1–14.

42. Cengiz-Yanardag E, Yilmaz SK, Karakaya I, Ongun S. Effect of different surface treatment methods on micro-shear bond strength of CAD-CAM restorative materials to resin cement. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2019; 33:1–14.

43. Matsumura H, Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Shear bond strength of resin composite veneering material to gold alloy with varying metal surface preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86:315–319. PMID: 11552170.

44. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Maltezos C, Blatz U, Mercante D, Burgess JO. In vitro durability of the resin bond to feldspathic ceramics. Am J Dent. 2004; 17:169–172. PMID: 15301212.